22 Oct, 01:47AM in sunny Singapore!

Loading level on buses (Part 2)

Subscribe to Loading level on buses (Part 2) 1,315 posts

Please Login or Signup to reply.
  • BusAnalayzer's Avatar
    10,384 posts since May '12
    • Loading on svc 71 @ 7.30am from AMK Ave 3

      ** assuming starting point ** 

      AMK Ave 3 -- 13 (0/13)

      AMK Ave 1 -- 22 (0/9), 32 (0/10), 43 (-1/12), 55 (0/12), 68 (-1/14)

      Bishan Road -- 68 (0/0), 69 (-1/2), 17 (-60/8) Bishan MRT. I alighted here

      ** Pax from AMK Ave 1 prefer 71 to 262 when going southbound to city (CCL/NSL)

      ** DDs make sense as loading is high towards Bishan in AM and high in PM from Bishan to Mayflower estate, especially when bus picks some pax from AMK Ave 4 towards Bishan, loading can go 80+ pax

      ** 262 has arrived 05 mins before, and next 262 is after 03 mins. 

       

       

    • ** Route is simulated, just in case you don't get it ** 

  • array88's Avatar
    1,375 posts since May '14
    • Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:

      Loading on svc 71 @ 7.30am from AMK Ave 3

      ** assuming starting point ** 

      AMK Ave 3 -- 13 (0/13)

      AMK Ave 1 -- 22 (0/9), 32 (0/10), 43 (-1/12), 55 (0/12), 68 (-1/14)

      Bishan Road -- 68 (0/0), 69 (-1/2), 17 (-60/8) Bishan MRT. I alighted here

      ** Pax from AMK Ave 1 prefer 71 to 262 when going southbound to city (CCL/NSL)

      ** DDs make sense as loading is high towards Bishan in AM and high in PM from Bishan to Mayflower estate, especially when bus picks some pax from AMK Ave 4 towards Bishan, loading can go 80+ pax

      ** 262 has arrived 05 mins before, and next 262 is after 03 mins. 

       

       

      It's amazing how your estimated 71 loading is higher than 110... I always expected it to be the other way round. Probably because of 71's heavy duplication along AMK Ave 4.

       

      Are you going to do simulation on 137/298/807/860 extension as well?

      Edited by array88 12 Oct `17, 2:04AM
  • AJQZC's Avatar
    1,011 posts since Sep '08
    • Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:

      ** Route is simulated, just in case you don't get it ** 

      Wow, seems that you're on a simulation team that's managing way more than just CGA T4 stuff. tongue.png

  • carbikebus's Avatar
    20,015 posts since Nov '03
    • Originally posted by AJQZC:

      Wow, seems that you're on a simulation team that's managing way more than just CGA T4 stuff. tongue.png

      Maybe he work for Shenzhen Bus co

  • lemon1974's Avatar
    9,286 posts since Dec '04
    • Originally posted by AJQZC:

      Wow, seems that you're on a simulation team that's managing way more than just CGA T4 stuff. tongue.png

      Err.  You know I know everyone know can already.  now the show is sequel n must make it more realistic. 

  • dupdup77's Avatar
    3,031 posts since Nov '13
    • Originally posted by lemon1974:

      Err.  You know I know everyone know can already.  now the show is sequel n must make it more realistic. 

      Hi mr lemon1974, I think all this simulation has sort of defeated the real objective of this loading thread. It used to be great and it provides people a real life situation of the passengers for certain bus services. But now, it becomes just like works behind computers. Cheers. Thanks.

  • AJQZC's Avatar
    1,011 posts since Sep '08
    • Originally posted by dupdup77:

      Hi mr lemon1974, I think all this simulation has sort of defeated the real objective of this loading thread. It used to be great and it provides people a real life situation of the passengers for certain bus services. But now, it becomes just like works behind computers. Cheers. Thanks.

      Can consider creating a new thread for such simulations.

  • SBS2792K's Avatar
    96 posts since Jun '17
    • Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:

      Loading on svc 71 @ 7.30am from AMK Ave 3

      ** assuming starting point ** 

      AMK Ave 3 -- 13 (0/13)

      AMK Ave 1 -- 22 (0/9), 32 (0/10), 43 (-1/12), 55 (0/12), 68 (-1/14)

      Bishan Road -- 68 (0/0), 69 (-1/2), 17 (-60/8) Bishan MRT. I alighted here

      ** Pax from AMK Ave 1 prefer 71 to 262 when going southbound to city (CCL/NSL)

      ** DDs make sense as loading is high towards Bishan in AM and high in PM from Bishan to Mayflower estate, especially when bus picks some pax from AMK Ave 4 towards Bishan, loading can go 80+ pax

      ** 262 has arrived 05 mins before, and next 262 is after 03 mins. 

       

       

      if this is an actual official set of data used by LTA, i can see why their route planning screws up so often... expectations vs reality is so different

       

      trust me, the loading wont be so high considering how the stops along amk ave 1 are struggling to have passengers throughout the day esp around blk 333 needless to say peak hours

  • SMB1368T's Avatar
    1,078 posts since Mar '16
    • Shall we just rename this thread instead? I also notice how bus svcs like 12 & 28 are underestimated with this method

      Edited by SMB1368T 12 Oct `17, 3:15PM
  • BusAnalayzer's Avatar
    10,384 posts since May '12
    • OK. ILL STOP. LETS BRING IT BACK TO ORIGINAL PURPOSE.

      If anyone is interested in simulation, pm me!! 

  • Loriwade's Avatar
    8 posts since Oct '17
  • BusAnalayzer's Avatar
    10,384 posts since May '12
    • Loading observation in Tuas this week:

      247 -  I observed this service for first time, but AM loading between 7-8am seems very good on 247

      192 / 193 - both are now getting some loading in the opposite direction as a feeder from Tuas MRT stations

      182 - still observed good 70-80 pax loading on DDs

      248 - wasn't able to observe!

       

  • Waynechew1003's Avatar
    114 posts since Apr '17
    • Loading for 76 still weekends is rather poor.

      off peak weekdays and peak weekends are okay

      possible for 76 weekends to be half SD half DD

Please Login or Signup to reply.