24 May, 06:26AM in sunny Singapore!

Miscellaneous Topics on Buses (Part 2)

Subscribe to Miscellaneous Topics on Buses (Part 2) 408 posts

Please Login or Signup to reply.
  • carbikebus's Avatar
    18,740 posts since Nov '03
    • Originally posted by TIB 585L:


      i prefer 903,901,900 can use DD oso since all 3 got some 'long haul residents'

      900,901 no need unless most of them take before Champions Way...

      40 A24s is not much even though they had lost Yishun feeders.

      67,172,176,184,188,190 should be prepared to have DD replace the O405Gs in few months time.

      With current B9TL fleets,60 more new A95 and 15 E500 for them I don't see why they can't do that?800,804,806,811 & 812 already goes to SBST..

  • BusAnalayzer's Avatar
    10,164 posts since May '12
    • Originally posted by TIB 585L:


      i prefer 903,901,900 can use DD oso since all 3 got some 'long haul residents'

      I agree all 3 can do well with DDs especially 901 and 903. Even 911 will be good with DDs. 912/913 may still be better of with A24s.

    • After Yishun feeders go to SBS, A24 allocation should like:

      858 - 05

      912 - 12

      913 - 11

      302 - 12

      * 300 can be full fleet SD with more DDs enthused on 301/983

      * 900, 901, 903, 911 will operate with DDs

      * 302 can have 2 DDs for trial. Could do well for CCK Crescent residents going all the way to CCK Interchange (can go upstairs). With 979 doing well with DDs, 302 also could do well.

       

       

       

  • SG5064X's Avatar
    106 posts since Dec '16
    • Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:

      300 can have A24 but deploy on S Shift while A22 on AP since peak hour a Time at Ave 4,there is Super high demand 

      Edited by SG5064X 21 May `17, 6:32PM
  • SMB315C's Avatar
    1,709 posts since Sep '14
    • Originally posted by SG5064X:

      300 can have A24 but deploy on S Shift while A22 on AP since peak hour a Time at Ave 4,there is Super high demand 

      I believe it'll be alright as long as 300 has a perfect 3-5mins frequency.. And not scheduling both 300 and 983 to depart interchange at the same timing..

  • carbikebus's Avatar
    18,740 posts since Nov '03
    • 300 demands has dropped significantly...After SBST take over Yishun feeders,300 can use 8 A22 and 3 A24 only.

  • TIB 585L's Avatar
    8,892 posts since Apr '11
    • Originally posted by carbikebus:

      900,901 no need unless most of them take before Champions Way...

      40 A24s is not much even though they had lost Yishun feeders.

      67,172,176,184,188,190 should be prepared to have DD replace the O405Gs in few months time.

      With current B9TL fleets,60 more new A95 and 15 E500 for them I don't see why they can't do that?800,804,806,811 & 812 already goes to SBST..


      901 901 is like 225 and 334 of SBST so i believe need. 912 would do well with DDs coz the route itself have only 1 bus that passed there for 80% of the route unlike 913 plus long haul travellers on 912 from checkpoint to Admiralty 913 route is parallel to many routes like: 178 at marsiling/checkpoint area. 904/964 btwn admiralty mrt to woodlands mart area and all the trunks that plies admiralty mrt. thus bendy can still do the job All other feeders in Woodlands doesnt have much parallel to trunk svc except 913.

      Edited by TIB 585L 22 May `17, 1:03AM
  • BusAnalayzer's Avatar
    10,164 posts since May '12
    • Originally posted by carbikebus:

      300 demands has dropped significantly...After SBST take over Yishun feeders,300 can use 8 A22 and 3 A24 only.

      A24s are going to be so precious. I am also okay with 300 be full fleet SD operating at 03-04 mins frequency as there is 301 and 983 to supplement that can operate high number of DDs. 

Please Login or Signup to reply.