26 Mar, 05:41AM in sunny Singapore!

Fares and "Huge deficit" under GCM "clearly not sustainable"

Subscribe to Fares and "Huge deficit" under GCM "clearly not sustainable" 128 posts

Please Login or Signup to reply.
  • SMB145B's Avatar
    2,052 posts since Dec '12
    • Originally posted by iveco:

      Tampines not even due for refurbishment yet.

      Wait till you see another chaos caused by the two tampines stations.

  • gekpohboy's Avatar
    1,228 posts since Mar '16
  • TPS Timothy Mok's Avatar
    975 posts since Aug '07
    • If service 85 was not withdrawn, then passengers can still take service 85 to Potong Pasir, Woodleigh, Serangoon, Kovan, Hougang and Sengkang from Orchard Road; and 123 will refuse their amendment to HarbourFront. 85 can also be extended to Punggol at the same time.

      85 should have kept, 147 is the one who became full fleet DD.

Please Login or Signup to reply.