23 Nov, 10:15PM in sunny Singapore!
Home Chit Chat

Nuclear Plants in sinkie

Subscribe to Nuclear Plants in sinkie 18 posts

Please Login or Signup to reply.
  • Songhengmee's Avatar
    7 posts since Feb '13
    • Where do you think the Pappies will place the nuclar plants to support 7 mil population?

  • Queen of sgForums
    驚世駭俗醜不啦嘰 moderatress
    FireIce's Avatar
    246,661 posts since Dec '99
  • 我很cute的,我不会咬你的
    TehJarVu's Avatar
    107,796 posts since Dec '03
  • Songhengmee's Avatar
    7 posts since Feb '13
    • If you play clash of clans...you would want to put your most protected building right in the middle of your defence protected by all your cannons and motar. Hmm..Istana or Oxley road would be a real good place to put the nuclear plants...protected by all the gurkhas.

  • ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~'s Avatar
    30,172 posts since Oct '02
  • venny's Avatar
    1,443 posts since Aug '07
    • Singapore should go for thorium nuclear power not uranium nuclear power. Its so much safer. Thorium nuclear power plants do not produce harmful radiation, operates at low pressure so it cant explode, does not have runaway reactions, produce only abit of low level waste. The best part is thorium is alot more energy dense and is cheaper and more abundant than uranium. It also cant be made into weapons and the technology is already in use in amercia, china and india.

  • troublemaker2005's Avatar
    8,443 posts since Dec '05
    • Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:

      as if neighbouring country wont complain...


      nabey! build nuclare plants to risk those complaints. why not reclaim land better? i dnt see why moving our east coast park further out to sea will cause scoastal erosion? technology so advance now what spread of erosion cannot be contained?!

    • Originally posted by venny:

      Singapore should go for thorium nuclear power not uranium nuclear power. Its so much safer. Thorium nuclear power plants do not produce harmful radiation, operates at low pressure so it cant explode, does not have runaway reactions, produce only abit of low level waste. The best part is thorium is alot more energy dense and is cheaper and more abundant than uranium. It also cant be made into weapons and the technology is already in use in amercia, china and india.


      can elaborate on the 'a bit of low level waste?'.

  • SJS6638's Avatar
    4,944 posts since Nov '11
    • Originally posted by troublemaker2005:


      nabey! build nuclare plants to risk those complaints. why not reclaim land better? i dnt see why moving our east coast park further out to sea will cause scoastal erosion? technology so advance now what spread of erosion cannot be contained?!

      now they are considering go underground.   

  • troublemaker2005's Avatar
    8,443 posts since Dec '05
    • how many underground area can they go? in fact our west coast ta the jurong island area  and east coast furtehr off shore lots of palce to reclaim. what coastal erosion?!

       

      our flooding problems are not conatined. our traffic mrt breaking down, still wanna add more problme to bury use underground 30 storeys should mishap happen? then dont push for 6.9 mil population of fake singaporena identities lah!

  • Summer hill's Avatar
    6,639 posts since Dec '11
    • Where do we get the uranium? icon_lol.gif

      What if the uranium gets stolen by terrorist? icon_lol.gif

      What if someone decided to plan a bomb on the nulcear plant? All we need is a fallout and we all will be forced to migrate. icon_lol.gif

  • troublemaker2005's Avatar
    8,443 posts since Dec '05
    • we got one storey below underpasses and shopping malls. they wanna go 30 storeys under. now terrorist and criminals got a new easy target alreayd. it will be very easy touse little bomb material to create a disater. one level up bomb can bury the whote 30 storeys under. please lah our civil defence even ready for this type of new disasters or not? until all our civil defence peoplea re trained and ready, from countries that have build structures like tehse and have encounter such disasters before on damge control and efficient rescue - dont come out with finniers ideas to supoprt the white paper lah. see how poor manaemne gahmen is - ne disaters suggesitons leads to another, just so that tehy can earn more bucks from headcounts!

  • Mr Milo's Avatar
    19,069 posts since Oct '09
    • This can be another reason why Atlantis sunk into the ocean:
      They built numerous nuclear reactors underground which failed, causing a gigantic nuclear explosion that made the surface cave in and water flooding in.

  • SBS2601D's Avatar
    8,411 posts since Apr '05
  • SMB145B's Avatar
    1,082 posts since Dec '12
    • Originally posted by SBS2601D:

      Nuclear plant as in those plants that bear radioactive fruits?teeth.png

      ...

      i lol'd

      It is Nuclear Power Station ...

  • Mr Milo's Avatar
    19,069 posts since Oct '09
  • Summer hill's Avatar
    6,639 posts since Dec '11
    • Originally posted by Mr Milo:

      nuclear explosion not likely…...but zombies most likely Laughing

      no living thing is immortal. icon_lol.gif

  • Mr Milo's Avatar
    19,069 posts since Oct '09
Please Login or Signup to reply.