I am wondering if u do know the meaning of the word aydiyahuma as in all of the translations from quran websites, it suggest tat both of the hands of the theives had to be cut off. I had said before tat aydiyahuma is the plural for 2 when it is use in hands. If u insist tat it meant 3, meaning u r the best translator among these quran translators, and the word hand meant anything u like, then I can only say u r forcing the quran to your ideals.You have ignored part of what i said. Even if it so, again, aydiyahuma in that sentence is given its figurative meaning strength of hands, power, property, wealth, blessings. Many Arabic words contain such multiple meanings. So cutting of hands is ruled out. Besides, this saying comes just after that, “But if the thief repent after his crime, and amend his conduct, Allah turns to him in forgiveness; for Allah is Most forgiving, Most Merciful.” How could this be applied if someone has his hands cut off?
In muslim, lewdness in men is never punished. Tat is why they r allowed to marry up till 4 wives.There goes your hasty assumptions again. There are verses concerning that elsewhere in the Qu'ran and Hadith. You are very selective in your reading. Next, how is having four wives lewd? Isnt it better to acknowledge a women as his wife rather than being a mistress, a kept woman whom society looks down upon? If you need to know, you must have the permission of the first wife before you can take another.
Tis just shows tat the quran, as in many other religion, is sexists and come out with rules strictly for a certain sex.Nopez.. its like i've said it above.
. Just because u say it mention only women doesn't means it have to be prostitution ! As said before, it may meant a lot of things such as premarital sex, masturbation etc etc.I've mentioned it concerns habitual fornication, like prostitution, premarital sex included. For watching porn, dressing sexily
Again u do not take in the literal meaning of the verse and u force in your ideals into the translation.Its not me, it was what i was taught.
Is there anything written in it tat ever suggest they be freed as long as she is "counselled" ?I need to repeat once more? Haiz.. After they were counselled and repented, turned back to theri religion, that is when God has saved them in a way, "or Allah ordain for them some (other) way." So yay.
You have ignored part of what i said. Even if it so, again, aydiyahuma in that sentence is given its figurative meaning strength of hands, power, property, wealth, blessings. Many Arabic words contain such multiple meanings. So cutting of hands is ruled out. Besides, this saying comes just after that, “But if the thief repent after his crime, and amend his conduct, Allah turns to him in forgiveness; for Allah is Most forgiving, Most Merciful.” How could this be applied if someone has his hands cut off?The thing is, the wording of the quran states it is the hand, not the wealth etc tat should be cut off. All the translated version points to the fact tat it points to the physical hands, not the things u want it to mean. If the thief repent after the crime, he can still go to heaven. And tat is it. He can also plead for forgiveness before his hands were cut off too. There r a lot of punishment tat u can never amend back as well, such as being caned or being jailed etc. Why should tis be different from them ? Don't u think it is shallow if u allow people to turn in for "forgiveness" just because he want to escape punishment ?
There goes your hasty assumptions again. There are verses concerning that elsewhere in the Qu'ran and Hadith. You are very selective in your reading. Next, how is having four wives lewd? Isnt it better to acknowledge a women as his wife rather than being a mistress, a kept woman whom society looks down upon? If you need to know, you must have the permission of the first wife before you can take another.How is having 4 wives lewd ? It certainly is more lewd than having 1 wife. It certainly is better to have a person have a single wife and no mistress or kept women etc. If the first wife don't give permission, then just divorce her lor... the male has the power to divorce his wife just by saying it out to her isn't it ?
Nopez.. its like i've said it aboveThere is nothing to be shameful about it being sexists. Jewish, Christian, catholic and muslim teachings r sexist to a certain extent. Surely u got to agree tat according to these scriptures, men r treated differently compared with women.
I've mentioned it concerns habitual fornication, like prostitution, premarital sex included. For watching porn, dressing sexily , masturbating, those are are personal, not social wrongs. Therefore, they are not included.According to muslim teachings, these r indeed social wrongs. It had explicitly mention just lewdness and it can means a lot of things. I am pretty sure thousands of years ago in all muslim communities, masturbation, dressing sexily. watching porn etc r prohibited for women. Your social wrong comes after being in being in a modern society for so long.
Its not me, it was what i was taughtMaybe u should be more pro active in your learning than just being taught straight from your religious leaders. They r human after all
I need to repeat once more? Haiz.. After they were counselled and repented, turned back to theri religion, that is when God has saved them in a way, "or Allah ordain for them some (other) way." So yay.I said before, u treat prostitution as a mental diesease or something tat need some psychology counselling. It is not ! in muslim community, if there ever was a prostitute, it is more likely she do it because of the great need of money and not because she enjoy so. As said by the translator, such means from allah can only come with legislation, not on any whim and fancy.
I want to stop this discussion you know.
However according to the quran, it stated tat their hands had to be cut off. U just keep saying your opinion but without references to the verse in the quran. Why don't u ask the english readers wat impression do they get from reading these lines ?
And it also meant tat they have to be under "house arrest" for possibly forever.I've explained how after they've reformed, they'll be allowed to do their daily activities outside of home. Please re read.
Tis fact is compounded with the fact tat in olden times, acts of lewdness such as masturbation, dressing sexily etc is strictly prohibited in all muslim communities.It is still prohibited, but its up to you wether you want to follow or not right? Once more, those are personal wrongs, between the person and God, not social crimes where it affects the community, therefore, you don't get punished with it.
I want to stop this discussion you know.but obviously u r still continuing with it. Obviously your continuous replies to it is a sign tat u want to continue the discussion.
At first thought, okay, people may see it that way but there are "hidden meanings" underneath. Then comes research, refering to the Hadith, a collection of the Prophet's sayings and deeds. Next, comes advice from the scholars to fill in any possible blanks. And that is how i came to my conclusion of what i posted. Okay? We still refer to the verse of "cutting hands" but again in the figurative meaning.Then, the scholars can come out with different conclusions, as can be seen tat tis act is indeed practised till recent times. In fact it may still be practised now. U say tat there r hidden meaning, but r we supose to "find hidden meanings" when it is stated in the quran tat your god stated 4 times "Easy have we made the Quran to understand; is there anyone who will pay heed?" Perhaps God wants to repeat this message because He knows that there will be boneheads "scholars" who will want to insist otherwise. (adapted from a website)
I've explained how after they've reformed, they'll be allowed to do their daily activities outside of home. Please re read.I had explained tat ypur interpretation is wrong. Please re read
It is still prohibited, but its up to you wether you want to follow or not right? Once more, those are personal wrongs, between the person and God, not social crimes where it affects the community, therefore, you don't get punished with it.However your god do states tat they get punished as such, muslim scholars do interprete it as such ,implement the policies as such, and people do get punished as such. In some muslim communities now tis law is still very much active. U say it is somethign between god and the peson, but too bad your god want other muslims to punish these acts of lewdness. If they don't punish these acts of "lewdness" they r classified as "disobedience".
but obviously u r still continuing with it. Obviously your continuous replies to it is a sign tat u want to continue the discussion.When somebody gives misconceptions on my religion, the least i can do is to try defending it right? But i really want to stop.
U say tat there r hidden meaning, but r we supose to "find hidden meaningsForget i said that.
I had explained tat ypur interpretation is wrong. Please re readOkay you are right then but that runs in contrast with the moderate muslims.
However your god do states tat they get punished as such, muslim scholars do interprete it as such ,implement the policies as such, and people do get punished as such. In some muslim communities now tis law is still very much active. U say it is somethign between god and the peson, but too bad your god want other muslims to punish these acts of lewdness. If they don't punish these acts of "lewdness" they r classified as "disobedience";.Haiz...
enough of pork...how about dogs and toilets whereby muslims are not allowed to use toilet paper to clean after business and such......instead they must use water? Not allow to touch dogs?.........Originally posted by dumbdumb!:is this an argument about pork? sheesh. get with the topic la ok?
truthfully, although most muslims will credit the health reasons for them not eating pork. thats not the main reason la.. first thing that comes to their mind is it is unclean spiritually. the health reasons are "by the way" reasons.
which reminds me. i had this friend, retarded, during primary school, he brought alot of bbq pork to sch to share with his friends. kids are so young, so innocent. so his malay friends asked what was that.
my friend said it was something delicious, and invited them to try, being a nice fella. so his malay friends happily helped themselves with the bbq pork, and enjoyed themselves very much. said it was really tasty, but never tasted this flavour before. so they asked what is it.
being so innocent. he was chiding them, "you never eat this before?! its pork!"
they all stared at him and rushed to the toilet to throw up.![]()
Stupidissmart would have been looking at a 30 day vacation if I replaced that imbecile Jason as the admin. You could be next in line if you support him.Originally posted by hoMMe:Oh com'on...this is just a discussion. Ain't some of the topics here are critical too?![]()