Having sex with with girls under the age of 16

• skyline63

  1 May 05, 13:43

  Because Singapore woman don't like their husband to go out and have sex in batam when they cannot even give her husband sex intercourse.
  
  See, I told you not to disturb Singapore woman. Let them go and be alone on the shelf.
• crazy monkey

  1 May 05, 13:48

  Originally posted by skyline63:

  Because Singapore woman don't like their husband to go out and have sex in batam when they cannot even give her husband sex intercourse.
  
  See, I told you not to disturb Singapore woman. Let them go and be alone on the shelf.

  go jump into the sea and kill urself
• Mozart

  2 May 05, 18:03

  No wonder the marriage rate among Singaporean men is getting lower. They prefer to stay single and not have the Women's Charter dangling precariously over their heads.
• surfer188

  3 May 05, 10:17

  Marriage should be seen as
  
  two people happily coming together, if have to leave/divorce do it happily & clear-cut.
  
  Not:
  Two People Happily coming together; SUE you big time with "Women Chapter" when thinks got bad.
  
  Just too bad, Singapore have not update the Women Chapter. In fact I fully agree on the responsiblities on kids, but disagree of other fact inside.
  
  Factors I disagree:
  
  1. It should be base on "WOMEN" is a "recommended" custody parent. It should be base on what support "That" parent can give. Who can provide more for the kid should logically have the custody.
  
  2. If "Wife" is working or having capbilities to work & support herself after a separations/divorce, her "Maintenance" should be cap/top limit. Because both should be responsible for their own future life, not depending on the ex-husband or take reference from what life-style was during marriage. What's gone is gone, One must work or built his/her future.
  
  3. Maintenance for kids should be clearly stated that "Both" parents should pay how much. This is to clear general doubt that "ONLY" the "Payer" side amount is for the kids. Actually the total amount of $ available for kids is double of whatz written in the order, basing on each parent have 50% responsibilities towards the kids. Current practice only order that no cuatody parent to pay a certain amount, never state the custody parent's amount. It's very very easy to over-look or forget to "consider" the custody parent's side.
  
  4. Should asset be equally divided base on $ contributions first. Then provide a sum/percentage for those women who are house-maker. Sum/percentage should also be cap base on number is years of contributions. Bearing in mind that House-Maker do have lesser responsibilities/work when contributing towards the total asset. The higher the total amount of asset the lesser the percentage, the lower amount of asset the higher percentage.