Originally posted by crazy monkey:
where do you get the stats from ? 
The figures were most likely obtained from an Amnesty International (AI) report "Singapore -- The Death Penalty: A Hidden Toll Of Executions":
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA360012004Under Section 5 "Executions: The death toll continues to rise":
"Singapore is believed to have the worldÂ’s highest
per capita execution rate, relative to its population. According to the UN Secretary-GeneralÂ’s quinquennial report on capital punishment, for the period 1994 to 1999 Singapore had a rate of 13.57 executions per one million population, representing by far the highest rate of executions in the world."
As expected, the Singapore government has fired back in rebuttal, claiming "AI has resorted to grave errors of facts and misrepresentations, which seriously calls into question the credibility of its Report":
http://www2.mha.gov.sg/mha/detailed.jsp?artid=990&type=4Excerpt from the above rejoinder article:
Amnesty International's claim that the death penalty is a violation of international human rights standards"6 In pursuing its international political agenda "Amnesty International opposes the death penalty worldwide in all cases without exception." AI makes the sweeping statement that the death penalty is a violation of international human rights standards.
"7 We do not agree with this. There is no international consensus on abolition of the death penalty. Key international instruments that apply to countries with wide divergences in cultures and values do not proscribe the use of the death penalty in their texts. For example, even the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights provides that the death sentence "may be imposed only for the most serious crimes".
"8 On the two occasions, in 1999 and 1994, that the European Union attempted to get the United Nations General Assembly to adopt a resolution that called for a moratorium on the death penalty with the view towards its abolition, these attempts failed. This was because a large majority of UN member states disapproved of the EU's attempt to impose their views and systems on the rest of the world. AI refers to the resolutions adopted in the UN Commission on Human Rights that encourage states to stop executions. However, AI failed to say that on at least seven occasions, a significant number of countries disassociated themselves from those resolutions. In 2003, 63 countries, or one-third of the UN's membership, disassociated themselves.
"9 AI accuses Singapore of "running counter to the worldwide trend towards abolition of the death penalty". But whether a country should retain or abolish capital punishment is a question for each country to decide, taking into account its own circumstances. Every country has the sovereign right to decide on its own judicial system. We do not live in a homogenous world. Within certain universally agreed broad parameters, international norms call for the respect of differences of views and beliefs. Singapore does not seek to impose its views on others. We only ask that others do not impose their views on us.
"10 Singapore weighs the right to life of the convicted against the rights of victims and the right of the community to live in peace and security. Taking into account our national circumstances, we have made a considered decision to retain the death penalty. It has worked for us, making Singapore one of the safest places in the world to live and work in."
Rest in peace, Shanmugam.