Originally posted by LazerLordz:
Singapore's Prime Minister Urges Use Of Hip-Hop
By Nolan Strong
Date: 5/13/2005 9:30 am
Singapore’s Prime Minister has launched a nationwide campaign utilizing Hip-Hop to stop the spread of “Singlish,” a mixture of English and local dialects.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said the mixing of the languages is a major issue, because it could leave Singaporeans unintelligible.
Loong urged teachers to use pop songs and Hip-Hop music to teach proper English.
"Speak in a normal Singapore tone, which is neutral and intelligible," Loong said. "But speak in full sentences, with proper sentence structure."
According to published reports, Loong’s administration started their campaign against the “Singlish” dialect in 2000. The government blamed a popular TV character named Phua Chu Kang for the rise in bad grammar among the population.
Loong has been criticized in the past for various social engineering campaigns aimed at the Singaporean population.
-----------
As if hip-hop is the pinnacle of good diction..
What is the point in trying to emulate the Englishmen we speak proper Queen English but the pockets have no monies.
There is no denying that English can be spoken with correct accents etc as we learn it in school. I am sure many people know the value of speaking and writing well without all the hypes and social engineering.
However, to spend the national time to promote language accents as spoken by the Englishmen or Americans or Chinese is like "much ado about nothing" . This is typical of the nanny state the government has been promoting all these time.
It will only be found that at the end of the day it is not campaign that will help citizens to speak or write better or to build a more vibrant society of the east. The correct approach lies in the willingness of government in promoting greater tolerances of various social and cultural values that belong to the people of various origins and ethnic backgrounds and adoption of proper values from young consistently promoted in schools all the ways up.
By governing the whole nation based on overwhelming pragmatism as is apparently being practised by our money-minded government, we tend to neglect considerations of needs and expectations and value systems setting itself backwards our language, cultural and social developments or the softwares of the people.
It is too obvious that the larger aspects of nation building in the context of social and cultural areas as expressed in the casino debates have been expectedly set aside leaving people largely dissatisfied and disappointed.
It is very clear that as long as government is able to achieve its targeted surpluses and comfortable lives for only the elites and the rich many of the problems concerning social and language aspects are secondary.
Under such conditions, I do not see the value in campaigns to promote any one's languages or social behaviours as government has not committed itself to upholding or promotion of root social and cultural values for all.
At best all kinds of engineering engineering, press control and brainwashing will have to be resorted to for justifications to serve narrow-minded pragmatic ends.
The more government treats everyone like kids and try to promote particular social language and ethical values through campaigns the more it will be running into contradictions with its real behaviours at works. To promote true social and correct personal behaviours and value systems, let it be done naturally through care and consistent practices at all levels of nationhood and not through artificial means.
Many problems including the teaching of values, religious and racial tolerances and respects for elderly and fellow human beings or Singaporeans should be spontaneously inculcated by setting good corporate governance standards and not artificially interceded by government campaigns.
Such aspects of national wellbeing is part of good corporate governance and the latter is only wish-washy what good is there of more artificial campaigns.
