FYI the concept of "blitzkrieg" was not created by hitler, it was thought up by the german war strategists.Originally posted by SMAPLionHeart:Leaders makes decision.
Whether he makes good or bad decisions . He is still famous for "blitzkrieg"
In fact, most inventors before and during the 1st half of the 20th century could be considered to be a subset of the entrepeneur group. If we didn't have the likes of inventors like Thomas Edison for example- or the guy who invented the telephone, we wouldn't have light bulbs today and without the telephone, we wouldn't even have the internet at the 1st place!Originally posted by pearlie27:That is called entrepreneurship.
As long as a leader makes a decision, he is a good leader ?Originally posted by SMAPLionHeart:Leaders makes decision.
Whether he makes good or bad decisions . He is still famous for "blitzkrieg"
Now i can see why SMAPlionheart got a A2 and not and A1 for history...Originally posted by BeEtHoVeN:As long as a leader makes a decision, he is a good leader ?
Btw, are u sure he conjured the Blitzkrieg strategy ?
In WW2, Germany had superior air forces, Hitler's military advisors wanted to field more interceptors, but Hitler insisted on increasing the attack-bombers configuration, if Hitler had listened to his advisors, the air war will be more decisive.
No good leader will insist on his way when clearly the other party has better experience in that field.
Hitler was a good speaker or even a good actor, but being a good leader is far more than being just able to talk.
This kind of leadership skill is known as "Autocratic Leadership". Autocratic leadership works well in situation when you have nothing; no resources, no motivation, no direction etc. However it needs to be adjusted once situation changed. Most autocratic leaders failed because of the failure to adjust when the situation changed.Originally posted by BeEtHoVeN:Hitler was a good leader, u got to be joking, Hilter refused to listen to others, believed in himself only, and when things go wrong, he shot himself in the head. Tell me what leadership qualities he possessed.
The only thing to learn from him is, well, dun be like him
No doubt he was a leader, but definitely not a gd leader by any way
Originally posted by dragg:many countries are better and stronger because of their access to natural resources and their longer history.
if singapore is 100 years she will be very rich. but i cant imagine how poor singaporeans will be.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Originally posted by timothytsgsg:They are leaders of their respective fields and industry that they are in. I'm only offering newer ones just in case people think that only considering political leaders is a narrow mindset.
In some cases overseas, these people who succeed in their fields have also succeeded in politics as they grew older. Ronald Reagan was a B list Hollywood star before and during WWII. Later he became President of the US during the 80s.
And besides a lot of younger people look up to the likes of Bill Gates and Steve Jobs these days.
That's how many Singaporeans can't think outside the box.Originally posted by Agressor:I was rather amused that our Minister of Education was alarmed by a group of students who named their team as Hitler in a recent leadership camp. (Today's ST)
Though I agree that Hitler should not be a person for the students to "idolise", but nevertheless, in terms of leadership, he was a man with great leadership. And considering that it was a leadership camp, I find the students rather creative using the name.
I am rather disappointed. On one hand, we had put in so much effort to instill creativity in our school syllabus, on the other hand, a cold, wet blanket dampened and extinguished the fire of creativity in them.
Considering the fact that the Minister of Education had stated, then I think one of my friend should change his name and his parents start doing research. His name is Abu Bakhar.![]()
Qin Shi Huang succeeded, Hitler failed. haven't you heard of the Chinese saying, "The winner becomes a king, the loser a bandit." Might is right....lOriginally posted by ndsef:Why is it that no one condems "Qin Shi Huang" like they do to Hitler? Millions died for his cause as well. He is instead hailed as a hero of some sort for doing what he did.
hitler failed? the autobahns and volkswagen beetles are still in existence today and doing very wellOriginally posted by oxford mushroom:Qin Shi Huang succeeded, Hitler failed. haven't you heard of the Chinese saying, "The winner becomes a king, the loser a bandit." Might is right....l