I am all for the govt using a portion of their reserves to subsidise good healthcare for the citizens.
One thing that bugs me no end is the fact that we have 'C' class wards in hospitals here. Have you ever visited someone who's staying in that dreaded 'C' class ward before? It's pretty depressing!! There are 7-8 beds to a room, the place is usually warmer, because of the close proximity, various noxious odours waft through the room when procedures and what-not are being done, there's very very little 'privacy', etc etc.
I would love to see the money being used to build better wards for patients and eradicate the 'C' class wards altogether. Imagine what that dreadful environment does to patients' psychological and emotional well-being, and don't forget the nurses and doctors who have to work there.

It's common knowledge that the poor nurses who work in such wards often have to sacrifice their breaks because they have too many patients to take care of. How do you expect quality healthcare when everyone's overstretched but nobody wants to admit it and address the issue??

Developed countries do not have wards that segregate you based on how much you can pay. The 'C' class ward is unheard of altogether.
Surpluses that are left over after a decent amount has been pumped in to activities that will help generate more income and savings, improve living conditions, etc. should also be used to subsidise nursing homes. There's now a crazy situation whereby families of patients who are slated for nursing homes do not cooperate by playing 'delay' tactics, simply because it's 'cheaper' for the patient to remain in a public acute hospital, than move to a nursing home. This creates a situation where public acute hospitals face full or close-to-full occupancy status, and it really is a waste of resources! Imagine, an acute hospital, being used as a nursing home!

Solve the problem once and for all, by generously subsiding nursing homes!

It's scary when a family member falls ill with a chronic condition because medical bills stack up!

Imagine, if mom or dad falls ill and they do not have a Medisave account or if they have already depleted theirs, you, as their child, will have to use yours. If we're talking about chronic illnesses, they usually come with a 'domino effect' where sooner or later, you get a host of other related medical conditions as well, and it's usually never isolated to just ONE medical problem. That means, $$$, and plenty of it!

So, you use your own Medisave to pay for them, then, what's going to happen when *knocks on wood ... you grow old and realise that your Medisave account had been substantially knocked out by then?

It's a 'legacy' we pass on to the next generation and the next, and the next... And with real inflation setting in, the situation will worsen.

If we have no surpluses left after chanelling it to areas of priority, then, there's nothing to say. However, if we DO have surpluses that can result in a better standard of living for all, including our elderly, our sick and our infirm, I wonder, why not??