Poll: Is Took Leng Hao a scapegoat or a thick person?
-
Seriously, if he had blood dripping from his hands, he should have followed the path taken by Mike McCrea to VIC. At least he could still save his life if he did so. Also, Huang Shuying's behaviour and previous criminal records suggest that she isn't what she seems. In fact, one NTU professor found her dodgy, if you recall this discussion.
It is possible that there is more to the case than meets the eye. A number of questions still remain unanswered. Who knows, the real killer could be laughing away at the verdict right now.
What are your views? Is Ah Hao really innocent and been made use of, or is he so thick that he doesn't know that the law has some loophole? -
IMHO, Ah Hao doesn't look and sound that innocent, his statements contradict too much and that is discomforting to the fact that he is trying to cover his guilt.
-
I say not the mother. She only offended the immigration law. She probably did that because she wanted to earn a living here. Dun think she is capable of murdering own daughter (murder other ppl maybe cuz she looks very fierce...hehe).
As for Took, I don't think he will be so willingly be used as a scapegoat. Nobody will. There is no reason for that. -
maybe he paid large sum of $$$ to die...
-
think about it ... if i m a murderer in running in malaysia do you think i will come back to surrender.
-
One should probably be insane to give oneself up but a human mind is very complex. He probably is feeling guilty-conscious at that moment of 'weakness'.Originally posted by antoh:think about it ... if i m a murderer in running in malaysia do you think i will come back to surrender. -
Also, has anyone noticed that he was not allowed to contact his lawyer when he surrendered? I think someone brought this up in earlier threads regarding the possible weakness of Singapore's judiciary.
-
But eventually he still saw the lawyer, right?Originally posted by iveco:Also, has anyone noticed that he was not allowed to contact his lawyer when he surrendered? I think someone brought this up in earlier threads regarding the possible weakness of Singapore's judiciary.
Somemore that was a very good lawyer. -
Not only this case, there are others too. It seemed this part of the judiciary system is flawed.Originally posted by iveco:Also, has anyone noticed that he was not allowed to contact his lawyer when he surrendered? I think someone brought this up in earlier threads regarding the possible weakness of Singapore's judiciary. -
Well, he went into the trial to clear his name (but failed, of course). By right, the prosecutor's job is to build a case against you from scratch. However, it isn't so over in Singapore. Here, they have the upper hand.Originally posted by Honeybunz:But eventually he still saw the lawyer, right?
Somemore that was a very good lawyer. -
Based on his character, i dun think so
-
I dun think he is a scapegoat... Just someone who made the wrong tactic, thinking he can come back, mislead the police, and then get away with his crime scot-free. He probably thought that by coming back, the police would be more inclined to believe that he wasn't the murderer. I find his version of the story totally unbelievable.
-
Well, his IQ is low, no offence but from his behaviour it is...Originally posted by cornyfish2000:I dun think he is a scapegoat... Just someone who made the wrong tactic, thinking he can come back, mislead the police, and then get away with his crime scot-free. He probably thought that by coming back, the police would be more inclined to believe that he wasn't the murderer. I find his version of the story totally unbelievable. -
Well he was dumb enough to think the singapore police can be fooled so easily... He must be kicking himself now.Originally posted by sbst275:Well, his IQ is low, no offence but from his behaviour it is... -
Because of his brain...Originally posted by cornyfish2000:Well he was dumb enough to think the singapore police can be fooled so easily... He must be kicking himself now.
Nah.. Anyway, I find there is more to it... -
How you know his character?Originally posted by sbst275:Based on his character, i dun think so
His friends at the market said he's quite hum sup one. -
Which man not hum sup? Just whether the show or not... heheheOriginally posted by Honeybunz:How you know his character?
His friends at the market said he's quite hum sup one. -
Well, you can see him his nor heng...Originally posted by Honeybunz:How you know his character?
His friends at the market said he's quite hum sup one. -
Aiyo......so long already ppl still can remember my posting........Originally posted by iveco:Seriously, if he had blood dripping from his hands, he should have followed the path taken by Mike McCrea to VIC. At least he could still save his life if he did so. Also, Huang Shuying's behaviour and previous criminal records suggest that she isn't what she seems. In fact, one NTU professor found her dodgy, if you recall this discussion.
It is possible that there is more to the case than meets the eye. A number of questions still remain unanswered. Who knows, the real killer could be laughing away at the verdict right now.
What are your views? Is Ah Hao really innocent and been made use of, or is he so thick that he doesn't know that the law has some loophole? -
Message to would-be killers: If you plan on liquidating anyone, have an Australian (or EU) visa ready. It took ages to bring Mike McCrea back for trial due to legal loopholes. Both Australia and the EU have removed capital punishment and have forbidden extradition to countries that still practice it.
-
And SG needs to rethink the lawsOriginally posted by iveco:Message to would-be killers: If you plan on liquidating anyone, have an Australian (or EU) visa ready. It took ages to bring Mike McCrea back for trial due to legal loopholes. Both Australia and the EU have removed capital punishment and have forbidden extradition to countries that still practice it.
Gulity unless you can prove your innocence, this is hai si lang -
Too bad he showed it lor. His friend also said that Took visit prost.Originally posted by Archie_boy:Which man not hum sup? Just whether the show or not... hehehe
How many man hum sup until must do that one? Many lah, but I dun think is all.
The way he attacked Huang Na which he demonstrated on the dummy actually matched the wounds that were found on the girl eg. head and chin injury (he stomped on her head to ensure she died, but she didn't), If it didn't match, I trust that his defendant lawyer shld be able to spot it and bring it up.
Why I think he's guilty:
1) He's calm when seeing the pic of body. Isn't Huang Na his friend? Conclusion : He feels ok about Huang Na's death
2) His smile disappeared when they sentenced him. Didn't the NUS A/Prof imply that the mother was behind it and Took was just a scapegoat?
Conclusion : If Took was willing to cover up for the real murderer, why did he break down in front of his family after the sentence.
3) The defendant lawyer could only defend him by insisting that Took has mental problem. If Took is innnocent, isn't there a better way to defend him? Why the lawyer didn't bring up "facts" like he is paid to dispose the body cuz he owed Ah Long debt... which has been brought up in another thread (see first msg in the thread for the link). This way of defending is more like... no other choice, last resort.
4) If the mother is suspicious, the defendant lawyer will also bring it up at the court too. Why didn't he? I dun think losing the case is what the lawyer wants.
Conclusion : Even the lawyer won't think the mother is fishy. -
Is there any written record of what the A/Prof say or not?Originally posted by Manager433:Aiyo......so long already ppl still can remember my posting........
I want to write to the press with that to let the reporters interview him. -
Everything seems to be so well-planned....i mean, the processes.....even the dialogues & expressions....
-
Originally posted by dcx:Everything seems to be so well-planned....i mean, the processes.....even the dialogues & expressions....
