Legitimized Corruption Understood

• mellaniehewlitt

  27 Aug 05, 22:35

  http://www.aseannewsnetwork.com/2005/07/singapore-review-legitimized.html
  
  From: Carl Kapeland
  To: Mellanie Hewlitt
  
  Singapore Review - Legitimized Corruption Understood
  
  In the latest developments the entire National Kidney Foundation Board of Singapore and its CEO have taken the easy route out and resigned. That's leadership for you, when things get messy, just get up and leave the mess for someone else to clean up.
  
  But I don't think the new CEO or Board will do much cleaning up. Looks like they are replacing one bunch of rotten apples with another bunch of potentially more rotten apples. It does not address the real problem.
  
  WHAT IS THE REAL PROBLEM?
  There are several recurrent issues here. Singapore is in this current mess because Lee's PAP Government has forgotten that not everything can be reduced to money. You cannot throw money at all your problems and expect it to magically disappear.
  
  The material base that motivates Singapore's "leaders" is only too evident when the NKF's transit CEO (Gerald Ee) hinted that "SGD600,000/- may not be sufficient for the new replacement to take office"!!! Money is the only motivating factor and if they have elected a leader and a board who is motivated only by money, its only
  a natural and unavoidable result that they will end up with an organization which has forgotten its once noble purpose and replaced it with more materialistic pursuits.
  
  Have they (Singapore) appointed a Wolf in sheep's clothing to guard their precious flock? For positions like these in charity organizations, THE CHIEF MOTIVATING FACTOR CANNOT BE MONEY! as they are not running an investment bank.
  
  The same applies senior public service positions and for ministerial positions. NOT EVERYTHING CAN BE REDUCED TO MONEY. But Lee's PAP Ministers have used this holistic approach to address any and all issues under the sun.
  
  Lee and his ministers simply CANNOT RUN A COUNTRY THE SAME WAY THEY RUN A COMPANY. Why? Because a country comprises of flesh and blood and spirit. A company is merely a corporate vehicle that is often set-up for the sole purpose of reaping a monetary profit.
  
  SINGAPORE AS A COUNTRY, IS NOT SINGAPORE INC!!!! And even if it is, its directors (and that means Lee and his million dollar cabinet) have to remain accountable to the shareholders (Singapore citizens). Singapore MINISTERS have to be transparent, and they are not especially as regards their salaries and the management of the country's reserves.
  
  Consider this, the NKF was originally set up as a supposedly charitable organization. In form and function it appeared above board and reputable. But in actual practice it had a hidden agenda to siphon wealth from the public into state coffers. And what happens to all this money (all SGD200 million of it?) No body knows.
  
  These same similarities in the NKF saga are reproduced on a grander scale in overall state administration in Singapore. Whether its the CPF, LTA, GLCs, Temasek etc they all relate to the the same basic issue. It goes back to the same bunch of corrupt leaders paying themselves and their cronies humongous rediculous salaries, approved
  and legitimized under a set of bogus laws that they legislated in the first place.
  
  But even before this NKF scam, transparency issues have dogged Singapore's state administration for decades and repeated requests by the World Bank, IMF, FTA and other NGOs for greater accountability and transparency have basically fallen on deaf ears.
  
  These are basic transparency issues which plaque management of public moneys by all state entities (whether its the CPF Board, GLCs, Temasek, LTA etc). There is massive deception on a grand scale and I suspect the latest NKF debacle only surfaced due to internal friction within Singapore's "inner-circle of elite politicians." Perhaps
  someone amongst Singapore's Ruling Elite wanted a bigger portion of the loot.
  
  Think about it. Durai commenced his latest law suite on the confident assumption that it would be a "no contest" walk-over like his two previous suites. But whilst the Singapore sham courts had no problems finding in his favor in the 2 previous suites (which were taken against private individuals and a volunteer who correctly questioned his lavish spending), the latest suite was against another state bureaucracy.
  
  And it was inevitable that the sham court found in favor of the bigger devil. So even amongst the thieves there is a power struggle over who gets a bigger piece of the loot.
  
  So this then is justice ala Singapore styled. Who you are and who you are connected with ultimately decides the outcome of the law suite.
  
  The material facts of the case (and legal premise) have little relevance in the kangaroo's court final assessment.
  
  But by far the most troubling problem is that of Legitimized Corruption. You (Mellanie) have used the term "Legitimized Corruption" very accurately, but failed to elaborate on its true meaning and implications.
  
  Legitimized Corruption means essentially that the corrupt act itself is made perfectly legal. That is why there is a possibility that the external audit on NKF may turn out nothing because Durai and his actions may have been all perfectly legitimate and authorized according to the internal constitution of the Board.
  
  In a normal organization with bona fide controls in place, the Board would not have approved and allowed such unreasonable and lavish expenditures. However, in Singapore's setting where "anything goes" it is possible that the board were within their discretionary powers to authorize such lavish expenditures. Mind you these are
  expenditures which (by any ordinary definition) would have amounted to an immoral mis-management of public moneys for unauthorized applications. But if the internal rules of conduct of NKF allowed the Board to act in this manner, it would then be an authorized and legitimate act.
  
  So even after the process of audit has concluded it is perfectly possible for the auditors to conclude that the use of donor funds for;
  
  a) Durai's pay of SGD600,000 and his salary of SGD1.8 million;
  
  b) All expenses and application of donor funds used for purchase of SGD990/- god taps;
  
  c) All expenses for first class air travel;
  
  d) The levying of a 30% Admin Fee;
  
  e) The hiring of personal drivers and limos.
  
  All of the above are authorized and legitimate.
  
  Anyway we all know that the so called "audit" of the NKF accounts is merely a publicity stunt to show case to the world that the current government and the new board is taking steps to remain accountable.
  
  But does this make the above acts any more acceptable and morally correct. NO! Of cause not. An atrocity is still an atrocity even though it is legitimized.
  
  One clear example is prostitution in Singapore. It is legal and the fact that it is legal does not detract one iota from the fact that it is still immoral, depraved and inhuman.
  
  Of cause there are critics who will argue that moral values are to subjective concepts and we cannot always use these imprecise measures to define what is right or wrong. And I concede that there is some truth in this as we live in a world coloured in grey.
  
  However, there will always remain some acts which are so blatantly wrong that they remain morally objectionable and immoral by any standard and yardstick. And the NKF scam (as well as Singapore ministerial salaries) fall within this category. It is morally wrong by any measure and this is not a grey area at all.
  
  This same logic applies on a larger scale as regards ministerial salaries and the process that is orchestrated to "approve" such unreasonable and lavish salaries (amounting to millions of dollars per minister).
  
  Legitimized Corruption works much like Money Laundering, but is worse. In essence Legitimized Corruption is corruption which is made legal. These perpetrators attempt to do what drug cartels and money launderers do;- basically "launder" the money (or the dishonest act) and make the final product appear nice and clean.
  
  But senior politicians differ from your average drug lord or mafia boss in one important respect;- these ministers are much more sophisticated. They know the system (and probably designed it) and know how to manipulate and tweak the system so that they can have access to the ill-gotten gains without getting their hands dirty.
  
  Next to them, Gordon Gecko and the God-Father look like novices and vestal virgins.
  
  However make no mistake the underlying act itself remains wrong, dishonest and morally objectionable but is hidden under a cloak of legitimacy. Drug money (and money from dishonest trades) is still ill-gotten loot. Behind this elaborate sham are a host of corporate and state entities (GLCs, state owned entities and yes, charitable organisations) which are set-up to place a corporate veil between the
  real perpetrators and the morally objectionable and dishonest transaction.
  
  The fact that it is perfectly legitimate does not itself make it MORALLY CORRECT.
  
  This is especially the case when you have a legislature that is totally removed (and remains out of touch) with the moral values and aspirations of the people it is supposed to serve and protect.
  
  In fact, this kind of legitimized corruption is the worst possible kind as it means the corruption has infiltrated the most senior ranks of management (and the political leaders).
  
  Compared to this elaborate deceit, the more obvious corruption in Indonesia are crude by comparison and far easier to identify and correct as it is acknowledged that such objectionable acts itself are WRONG and are not endorsed by the country's laws.
  
  How do you ask a cop to catch a thief when the cop himself is a thief?
  
  Legitimized Corruption by its very nature is more sinister and difficult to identify. For instance, a government official who accepts bribes worth $1.6 million a year is guilty of corruption. But what happens if this same official or minister receives this money as part of his "LEGITIMATE" salary.
  
  In both cases the act itself is the same unconscionable and immoral act. But in the later case, there is no need for the official to hide his ill-gotten gains as it is
  formally endorsed by an equally corrupt legislature/parliament who has a hand in the ill gotten gains.
  
  The definition of a Parasitic Leech is as follows: "leech: a follower who hangs around a host (without benefit to the host) in hope of gain or advantage"
  
  The kind of legitimized corruption already endorsed and prevalent in Singapore's state machinery is far worse. It is a cancerous malice which is more surreptitious and insidious.
  
  The festering rot is not immediately apparent to an external casual observer but is eating away the core of the its host. Left unchecked, such parasites will consume a once healthy body before discarding the empty shell and relocating to another unwary host.
  
  Legitimized Corruption is also like cancer. It is a chronic ailment which rooted itself very deeply within the host (and the state machinery). Such a chronic ailment did not occur over night but took place over decades of accumulated unchecked accesses.
  
  Durai himself was in the NKF for over 30 years and it is no mere coincidence that
  Singapore has been under the same government (and people and family) for over 30 years.
  
  This is precisely the reason why in the US and other bona fide democracies there is a mandatory change in administration every 4-8 years. A new administration brings forth a completely new government which will was away unchecked accesses and commence things tabula rasa.
  
  But somehow in Singapore it appears that only families starting with the Lee sirname or who are closely affiliated with this first family are the only candidates who qualify for election.
  
  What a quaint and family friendly arrangement! Its just too bad that the average
  Singaporean is excluded from this elitist inner-circle.
  
  However, Singapore's Ruling Elite also have to be wary of the accompanying dangers of in-breeding which can occur from a small and exclusive gene pool. Cancerous deformaities can result after generations of in-breeding.
  
  And the Cancer has many signs and symptoms. There have already been many evident tell tale signs of the internal rot and its accompanying putrid stench. However, Singaporeans in their numbed state of awareness may be mistaking the over-powering stench of decay for sweet perfume.
  
  The entire state machinery is orchestrated to maintain this state of illusion and deception.
  
  In the normal mechanics of an open and transparent state legislature and government, the moral values of the mans on the street is reflected (although not perfectly) in the policy formulation process.
  
  This is not the case in Singapore and your "leaders" know it. Just challenge them to run a referendum regarding their salaries and it will be evident that 90% of the population are totally disgusted by such blatant acts of greed.
  
  Of cause the local state owned media will somehow always paint the picture of an adoring and obedient public as part of an elaborate charade. So the truth never ever gets out.
  
  Corruption of this scale starts form the top and slowly works its way down the ranks to pollute every senior arm of the state machinery from the Judiciary to Legislature to the Executive and especially to a docile and compliant state managed local press.
  
  It cannot be stopped easily without external intervention.
  
  Slowly but surely what started off as a morally unacceptable issue becomes part and parcel of "accepted norm" which is disguised behind a pile of state endorsed laws and bills.
  
  Even the once sacred document, the Constitution, is not spared and is re-written to the whims and fancies of those they serve. How many Singaporeans are aware of the fact that the country's Constituion has been amended to allow state owned entities and GLCs easier access directly to the country's reserves?
  
  And it also does not take a genius to work out that it is the close affiliates of the Ruling Elite who sit on the management boards of these state owned entities and GLCs.
  
  The following is a fascinating observation. The exact size of Singapore's foreign exchange reserves and the management of those funds is designated as a STATE SECURITY FOR INTERNAL SECURITY REASONS.
  
  Is it mere co-incidence that the conservative ball park estimate of the net worth of the Lee family is roughly equivalent to your country's reserves? (USD130-140 billion?)
  
  What you have in Singapore are a bunch of hired mercenaries who are ripping off the very people they are supposed to look after.
  
  Singaporeans. This is your country and your life. If you continue in this state of drugged apathy, you will cease to have any control over your own faith and destiny.
  
  Do you really want to hand over your life to the devil?
  
  Do you want to have a Singapore with No Singaporeans?
  
  Its time to wake up from your state of denial and confront the harsh reality before your very eyes.
  
  Yours faithfully
  Carl Kapeland
  Ohio State
  
  #Article posted by Wolfgang Holzem / Erwan Shah @ 10:47 AM
  
  
• Cindyfeh

  28 Aug 05, 22:07

  The article was discussed in the forum some weeks back.
  
  But nevertheless, worth rereading.
• pearlie27

  31 Aug 05, 17:45

  >>Consider this, the NKF was originally set up as a supposedly charitable organization. In form and function it appeared above board and reputable. But in actual practice it had a hidden agenda to siphon wealth from the public into state coffers. And what happens to all this money (all SGD200 million of it?) No body knows. <<
  
  Though the operation of NKF is questionable, I think it is too premature and unwise to say it had a hidden agenda.
• Elfred

  31 Aug 05, 18:15

  Originally posted by pearlie27:

  >>Consider this, the NKF was originally set up as a supposedly charitable organization. In form and function it appeared above board and reputable. But in actual practice it had a hidden agenda to siphon wealth from the public into state coffers. And what happens to all this money (all SGD200 million of it?) No body knows. <<
  
  Though the operation of NKF is questionable, I think it is too premature and unwise to say it had a hidden agenda.

  I agree.
  
  The exact operation is indeed absurd:
  1. Donors who intend their monies to help needy patients unknowingly donate to the pocket of some CEO and fund his luxurious first class trips, various cars for his comfortable travel and the little golden tap;
  2. NKF could be blind to invite a peanut-chewing Durai to operate a Durai-ian operation on a Charity for three years, aka 1200 over days...
  3. Durai can operate NKF just by painting the facts and figures calling for my ignorant fools to pump up his wonderful resume while the strigent requirement deprive many patients treatment;
  4. And don't forget, with such huge reserves, NKF patients receive not free treatment from such impair which is obviously not what they pray for.
  
  Now is that how charities should be run???
  
  But before the investigation is over, it is too premature to say of hidden agenda. Even if investment usually is made on GLC related stocks and shares, we have to consider even citizens can buy (eg) comfort groups from open market.
  
  The issue is, you cannot blame entities from making investment on good performing investments though you can vote your disapproval during election.
  
  So here, we have to be clear cut about things. If there is such reserve, it must have been placed in some sort of investment portfolio. Can people just claim that since there are investments in Temesek related companies, then that's hidden agenda to siphon monies...?
  
  Then many people holding onto Singtel, Comfort and NOL shares will be guilty as well.