Is it going to be a complete ban? I thought the govt was leaving it to the pub/bar owners to decide if they want a smoking corner.Originally posted by aleo:Smokers will be more and more disappointed with the unjust action by G**t...It is true that G**t doing this for the help and sake of a good health for everybody...And maybe their first action to help pple save money and in return reduced their cigarettes income...However, there should be human rights like in other countries...Banning smoking in Pubs and bars is really outrageous...No reason for that at all...Those pple going pubs, discos etc will jolly well know that such places bound to be smoky as people smoke inside...But now when you just want to enjoy , drink and smoke in such places over the weekends or after a hard day work also cannot...Aiyoh...Pity the smokers..
you should watch this week's crossfire.Originally posted by miss_soojung:Is it going to be a complete ban? I thought the govt was leaving it to the pub/bar owners to decide if they want a smoking corner.
It is only fair that the rights of the non-smoking public be taken into consideration as well.
how would the smokers feel if the pub only allowed non-smokers(i mean non-smokers and not no smoking)Originally posted by dragg:you should watch this week's crossfire.
how do you feel if a pub decides to admit only smokers?
Who cares? Its like as though there are more smokers than non smokers.Originally posted by dragg:you should watch this week's crossfire.
how do you feel if a pub decides to admit only smokers?
if it is all about health then a lot of things need to be banned.Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Ban totally. I support it. Health is wealth. No health, no wealth. Who cares whether this is a big source of income for government? Got casino. I wish they ban casinos too.
why is a smoker-only concept dumb? it has no impact on the smokers and business is not affected too.Originally posted by hisoka:how would the smokers feel if the pub only allowed non-smokers(i mean non-smokers and not no smoking)
a smoker-only concept is dumb but maybe a can smoke concept for some as in clearly stated along with other no smoking pubs maybe
COE is a bigger source of income.Originally posted by stellazio:Government cannot ban la..Its a big source of income..![]()
want to ban prostitution or not ?Originally posted by BlUe G@rF|eLd:Time for the tupid g**t to ban cigarette, liquor, and all those deem unhealthy staffs, including coffee... so and so. Oly ting left nt banned is ice water and roti kaya... all rot to death in S'pore.![]()
![]()
You are correct that we can't possibly tell the smoking tourists not to come here. But I don't support total ban. I will prefer banning in public places like bus stops and bus interchanges, but not pubs and discos. If those people who doesn't like the smoking in pubs and discos, then don't go. Don't call for a ban. You want them to smoke at home and harm their own family members?Originally posted by dragg:if it is all about health then a lot of things need to be banned.
i dont believe singapore will ban cigarettes. when they do the tax from cigarettes will have to come from somewhere else. and thats a big one!!!
tourism will be affected too. i wonder if the govt will tell the smoking tourist not to come.
Ltr ltr!! Tat wan special wan, muz do research and filing then kan officially make it extinct from human world!Originally posted by crazy monkey:want to ban prostitution or not ?![]()
Haha! Didnt u koe hw Adolf Hitler dominates his country!Originally posted by dragg:maybe they should give pubs and discos the option of deciding what they want.
Just to add a bit. Bank health - badOriginally posted by dragg:isnt it funny to ban cigarettes but open 2 casinoes?
oh, gambling is not bad for health. only bad for your bank account!!!
not lah both will still be around because $$ go to govt.Originally posted by dragg:isnt it funny to ban cigarettes but open 2 casinoes?
oh, gambling is not bad for health. only bad for your bank account!!!