Greengolblin is a unfair moderator
-
Greengoblin said he would close my topic if he FEEL LIKE it.So this is the way he does his job.He is a unfair guy.
-
So what are you gonna do about it?
-
What can i do except to speak out?
-
go to CC then FireIce very fair
-
Have you tried meeting him in real life and poking him using a pair of chopsticks?Originally posted by PRP:What can i do except to speak out? -
After i pointed out a major error of homo's favourite argument,Thinger (who maybe someone's nickname) insulted me with vulgar words & rebutted me my argument.Earthlings called for the topic be closed & mod repled he would close it when he felt like it.Then the next day,mod closed the topic claiming i made personal attack.
Below is my personal opinions.
Earthlings wanted the topic close because Thinger used vulgar words to insult me (i think he is a peace loving person).He is possibly an influencial person,so mod was obliged to close the topic not withstanding he claimed he wouldn't do it just because Earthling called for it.He said he would close the topic depend on his FEEELING.The reason he gave to close the topic is just an excuse & lie.
Of course,the mod closed that topic before i had an opportunity to rebut Thinger's argument.He gave homo supporter the last say.He is biased on this issue & not suitable to be the mod for it. -
then who suitable?
u?
hahahahahahha
can u hear my leg hair laffing? -
Greengoblin closed my topic after i quoted a msg which supports me & criticises him.So this is way he closed my topic -- depned on his FEELING.
-
Are u a homo supporter?Originally posted by FireIce:then who suitable?
u?
hahahahahahha
can u hear my leg hair laffing? -
Sapporting homos isnt the issue, but sarporting whiners...well...
-
We all know that the majority of our society, conservative or not, do not accept homosexuality as natural and normal behaviour. They can call us "homo bashing" or " bigot" or whatever.
The reality is that you can't change them, and enough is said to tell them that they are wrong! Your posts here serve no purpose except for them to continuing putting free adverts for homo activities.
They have moved to their corner. As in society, I don't care as long as they stay in their little corner and not coming out and ask for equal marital status......Go there if you want to fight them.
As normal ppl, we also need to grow up!
-
The right to marry one's true love is a basic human right, regardless of the gender of those involved. Your may talk about the Sedition Act being harsh on racist bloggers or feel that it should encompass religious vilification as well, but I swear the biggest threat to society is homophobia.Originally posted by sgdiehard:They have moved to their corner. As in society, I don't care as long as they stay in their little corner and not coming out and ask for equal marital status......Go there if you want to fight them. -
Sedition Act is a law but used at the discretion of the government. Pls do not put the wishes of the majority of the public on the same side as the government!!Originally posted by iveco:The right to marry one's true love is a basic human right, regardless of the gender of those involved. Your may talk about the Sedition Act being harsh on racist bloggers or feel that it should encompass religious vilification as well, but I swear the biggest threat to society is homophobia.
The majority of the people form the society in general. We know what the majority of the society think on this issue. Who is feeling the threat?
As for the right of the gay, NO DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE.
do you think Greengolblin is unfair? -
He is a villian, what do u expect
-
dun like den dun post here la..
-
Haiz can't even spell my name properly
-
Ehhh u anus hollow damn u understand so unfair one...only call one moderator unfair... there are two of us okay....Originally posted by PRP:Greengoblin said he would close my topic if he FEEL LIKE it.So this is the way he does his job.He is a unfair guy.
If left to me I close your nonsense long time ago liaoz... -
Hey wait.. You are the one who brought it up again.. And now you claim that no discussion here please? sound hypocritical isn't it?Originally posted by sgdiehard:As for the right of the gay, NO DISCUSSION HERE PLEASE.
do you think Greengolblin is unfair?
Anyway, since this thread is opened again..
Washington State Gays Wait For Marriage Ruling
by 365Gay.com Newscenter Staff
Posted: September 26, 2005 12:00 am ET
(Olympia, Washington) A decision could come at any time in a case seeking marriage rights for gay and lesbian couples in the state of Washington. Arguments challenging the state's ban on same-sex marriage were made before the Washington Supreme Court last March. The case involves eight same-sex couples who were denied marriage licenses in King County.
In August, King County Superior Court Judge William Downing said that the Washington State Constitution guarantees basic rights to lesbian and gay people - and that those rights are violated by a state law prohibiting same-sex couples from marrying.
Downing's ruling went on to say that the couples must be given marriage licenses. One month later, a court in Thurston County ruled similarly.
The Supreme Court typically issues its rulings on Thursdays and same-sex couples have been anxiously checking the court's web site weekly for months.
Equal Rights Washington, the state's largest LGBT rights group, says it expects if the suit is successful gay and lesbian couples could immediately apply for licenses. The first weddings would take place following a three-day waiting period, which would make it a Sunday.
Equal Rights is optimistically looking forward to winning the case. It's prepared a check-list for couples who are prepared to Marry "Anything that can be taken care of ahead of time, so it's not just a scramble," Fran Dunaway, executive director of Equal Rights Washington told the Seattle Times. "There'll be dresses to buy; suits to iron, flowers to be picked up. It would be a powerful experience for a lot of people."
Legal experts say the court could rule in any of three ways: It could declare DOMA unconstitutional and grant same-sex couples the same rights as heterosexuals, uphold DOMA, or ask the Legislature to resolve the issue.
A conservative group opposed to same-sex marriage is already calling for an amendment the state constitution. The Supreme Court of New Jersey will hear a similar bid for gay marriage in the Garden State in this session and New York's highest court is likely to get a third case later this year.
Seven same-sex couples in New Jersey are suing to marry. (story) Represented by Lambda Legal, they argue that the New Jersey Constitution guarantees them the right to wed. In New York, arguments were made this month in a mid level appeal of a ruling that the state's ban on gay marriage was unconstitutional. The case, and two others in the Empire State, is likely to end up in New York's highest court - the Court of Appeal. -
Archbishop supports new book that challenges church line on gays
Gays and the Future of Anglicanism published this week
The Archbishop of Wales has welcomed a ‘cogent’ new book by 22 leading
theologians that argues for gay peopleÂ’s inclusion within the Anglican
ministry. Written by ‘some of the finest theological minds’, it
challenges the moratorium on gay consecrations and same-sex blessings
of the Anglican Communion. ‘This book throws down a formidable
challenge to the Anglican Communion. It cannot afford to ignore itÂ’ he
commented.
The Archbishop, Dr Barry Morgan, who was himself one of the people
responsible for the Windsor Report, which recommended the moratorium,
made it clear that the issue is far from settled: ‘The arguments
advanced for including gay people [in the church] deserve to be read
and pondered by all who are involved in the debate about human sexuality.Â’
The book, says the Archbishop, ‘shows up the superficiality of
previous Anglican discussion of this subject’ and should ‘give the
Anglican Church in many places cause for penitence for the way it has
treated and thought about gay people.Â’
The book Gays and the Future of Anglicanism, edited by Oxford
theologian Andrew Linzey and Richard Kirker, Director of the Lesbian
and Gay Christian Movement will be published by O books at the end of
September. Among the 22 contributors are Archbishop Rowan WilliamsÂ’
successor at Oxford, Dr George Pattison, the Lady Margaret Professor
of Divinity.
Responding to the ArchbishopÂ’s statement (full text below), Professor
Linzey said, ‘This is a welcome sign of a rethink. We were always told
that Windsor was a process not a judgment – it is excellent to have
confirmation of thatÂ’. Some fear that the Windsor Report will lead to
the exclusion of all gays from the Church. ‘Preposterous as it sounds,
some people want to make attitude to gays the criterion of being an
Anglican’, added Professor Linzey. ‘The book is really a devastating
critique of current church policyÂ’.
The book contains 22 chapters by major theologians from the UK and the
US. Eight of the contributors are theologians from Oxford: Marilyn
McCord Adams, Philip Kennedy, Christopher Lewis, George Pattison,
Martyn Percy, Vincent Strudwick, Keith Ward and Andrew Linzey. Regius
Professor of Divinity at Oxford, Marilyn McCord Adams calls upon the
Anglican Communion to apologize for its ‘rude reception of gay
clergyÂ’, and Dr Philip Kennedy, Senior Tutor of Mansfield College,
Oxford, maintains that ‘Neither God nor Jesus can be convicted of gay
bashing. The same could hardly be said for many of their devoteesÂ’.
The book marks the first major engagement by Anglican theologians with
the gay issue since the publication of Windsor last year.
Statement of the Archbishop of Wales, Dr Barry Morgan, on the publication of
Gays and the Future of Anglicanism:
There are three things which characterise this book. It is quite
hostile to the Windsor Report (I write as one of the people
responsible for that report); it argues cogently for gay peopleÂ’s
inclusion within the Anglican Communion and its ministry; and the
essays are by some of the finest theological minds in the Communion.
The Windsor Report, whatever its shortcomings – is at least remarkable
in that its seventeen members from across the whole Communion, and
from widely different backgrounds and theological viewpoints, did at
least manage to achieve unanimity. Its aim was to find a way of
enabling different theological perspectives within the Communion to
co-exist with tolerance and patience that is usually characteristic of
Anglicanism whilst respecting the autonomy of churches on the one hand
with the need for mutual inter-dependence and accountability on the
other, but without the setting up of a central curia. But perhaps I
protest too much.
The arguments advanced for including gay people within the church and
its ministry deserve to be read and pondered by all who are involved
in the debate on human sexuality. They deal in depth with the issue
from the perspective of scripture, tradition and experience, by
scholars who know what they are talking about. The arguments advanced
here show up the superficiality and even the shallowness of the 1998
Lambeth plenary on the same topic and should also give the Anglican
Church in many places cause for penitence for the way it has treated
and thought about gay people. We desperately need a listening and
study process on this topic in the Communion as has long been
recommended to no avail and it is good that the ACC at its meeting
this year has now agreed to gather material from across the Communion.
It might find, as the WCC found when it gathered material from all
its member churches and as this book demonstrates that sexual sins are
not the only sins and are not even the main sins according to
scripture; that theology has to be open to the possibility of
encountering God’s revelation of truth in new and novel ways – that’s
what the doctrine of the Spirit means and that what is often lost in
the so called debate about human sexuality is the fact that we are
talking about real persons with real feelings. This book throws down
a formidable challenge to the Anglican Communion. It cannot afford to
ignore it. -
An extremely meaningful article.. Written in a neutral way, neither pro- nor anti-.. Just exploring the issues amongst the "new" gay generations.. How they learn to accept or reject their own identity..
http://www.time.com/time -
Hi,
You could stop posting
There are other forums around.
In my view, as long as one did not set up the forum, one is a tenant. And a tenant's lease can expire any time.
Furthermore, no one needs to pay rent here.
I have posted for 10 years in different forums (albeit with breaks in between) and never had a single posting deleted.
Regards -
Precisely why you should be in admin alongside Jason and FI.Originally posted by CenturionMBT:Ehhh u anus hollow damn u understand so unfair one...only call one moderator unfair... there are two of us okay....
If left to me I close your nonsense long time ago liaoz... -
Glad to know your viewpoint.U are wrong to say debating the issue here would give them free ad.In fact,some of them want my topic closed.So they don't want to hear comments on homo.Even the mod who must be homo supporters want my topic closed!Originally posted by sgdiehard:We all know that the majority of our society, conservative or not, do not accept homosexuality as natural and normal behaviour. They can call us "homo bashing" or " bigot" or whatever.
The reality is that you can't change them, and enough is said to tell them that they are wrong! Your posts here serve no purpose except for them to continuing putting free adverts for homo activities.
They have moved to their corner. As in society, I don't care as long as they stay in their little corner and not coming out and ask for equal marital status......Go there if you want to fight them.
As normal ppl, we also need to grow up! -
Dirty words u used.Like that can be a moderator?How about every member follow your example?Originally posted by CenturionMBT:Ehhh u anus hollow damn u understand so unfair one...only call one moderator unfair... there are two of us okay....
If left to me I close your nonsense long time ago liaoz... -
Mod make a survey to determine whether this topic shoud stay.Greengolblin has improved a bit?He would no longer close my topic as he feel like?
Is ther a need for such a survey for this topic?Why can't Green speak up to defend himself against my accusation?If members are not interested in this topic,it would die of 'natural death'.If members are interested,why want to close it just because a group of ppl want it close?