Commentary on Ministers "pay cut"
Singapore Review, 2 May 2003
By Mellanie Hewlitt
The headlines blared loudly in the 2 May 2003 issues of the Straits
Times and Business Times "Pay cut? Ministers ready to lead by example:
DPM", announcing to the entire world this selfless act of leadership by
Singapore's Ruling Elite.
In what appeared to be an initial move to reduce severely inflated
salaries, to more reasonable industry standards, Singapore's Ruling
Elite have bowed to public pressure and hinted at accepting a pay cut.
Or have they?
What exactly does "Leading By Example" mean? Lets try to put some
substance behind those brave words. As of last count, average take home
pay of a Singapore minister was well in excess of SGD100,000/- a month.
The below table puts things back in proper perspective: (these are
basic figures as of July 2000 and did not include last year's pay hikes
or other benefits. Otherwise the updated numbers may well be much
larger)
1. Singapore Prime Minister's Basic Salary US$1,100,000 (SGD1,958,000)
a year Minister's Basic: US$655,530 to US$819,124 (SGD1,166,844 to
SGD1,458,040) a year
2. United States of America President: US$200,000 Vice President:
US$181,400 Cabinet Secretaries: US$157,000
3. United Kingdom Prime Minister: US$170,556 Ministers: US$146,299
Senior Civil Servants: US$262,438
4. Australia Prime Minister: US$137,060 Deputy Prime Minister:
US$111,439 Treasurer: US$102,682
5. Hong Kong Chief Executive : US$416,615 Top Civil Servant: US$278,538
Financial Sec: US$315,077
Source: Asian Wall Street Journal July 10 2000
In relative terms, less then 20% of Singaporeans here have take home
salaries exceeding SGD100,000/- A YEAR.
In stark contrast, BASIC SALARY FOR A MINISTER STARTS AT SGD1,166,844 A
YEAR,OR JUST UNDER SGD100,000 A MONTH.
What these ministers earns in just ONE MONTH exceeds the ANNUAL TAKE
HOME salary of 80% of Singapore's income earning population. Lets not even
begin to compare annual packages which will exceed SGD1 million easily.
With the above numbers and figures now in perspective, it is easier to
give substance to the words "leading by example". Several facts are
noteworthy here;
a) That the ministerial salaries are grossly out of proportion, even
when compared with their counterparts in much larger countries (US and
UK) who have far heavier responsibilities.
b) That these salary reductions were long overdue. In the past, such
handsome remuneration were "justified" on the back of resounding
performance. However, Singapore's economy has been in the doldrums of
a recession for several years now (with beginnings reaching as far
back as the 1997 Asian economic crisis). This economic barometer is a
rough measure of performance and implies that ministerial salaries
were due for review at least 3-4 years ago.
c) That adjustments should be made to bring them back within the
industry benchmarks. Taking the salary of US vice president as a rule
of thumb, the percentage for reductions should start at 50% of current
pay. Even if a Singapore minister takes a 50% pay-cut, he would still
be earning much more then the US vice president.
d) The percentage reductions should greater then 50% if the intent is
to bring the salaries within the perspective of Singapore's domestic
scene.
With such inflated figures, it is understandable why the local
government controlled media (Singapore Press Holdings) have taken pains
to exclude mention of actual numbers for the world to see. The numbers
would be too glaring and no amount of window dressing or creative
writing could have reconciled these numbers with a sane figure and
restored credibility.
It is unlikely that Singapore's Ruling Elite will accept such huge
salary cuts. Exactly How much and when the ministerial pay-cuts takes
effect is not revealed. Ask any man on the street and 9 out of 10
responses indicate many agree the current ministerial salaries are
grossly inflated, especially in these lean and difficult times.
Said a long time forumer from an internet political chat group:
"First of all the Ministers are NOT leading on pay cut. Workers'
salaries have been drastically reduced since the beginning of the
recession while thousands have been unemployed. so the Ministers are
NOT LEADING. they are only CATCHING UP. And they have several decades
to catch up on."
"Secondly, how much of a pay cut will Ministers take? 10%? 20%? unless
its a cut that will affect their lifestyles, it is merely symbolic and
they would still not know what it feels like to be a normal worker. as
such, this is not Leading by Example. Its just another bogus political
propaganda stunt"
A 29 yr old executive who requested to remain anonymous admitted
sheepishly ; "The numbers (ministerial salaries) are a national
embarrassment really, because it reflects the underlying materialistic
value systems of Singapore Ministers. No matter how you look at it, the
fact remains that our ministers are money faced, and these are supposed
to be Singapore's leaders, with value systems that Singaporeans should
follow." "It (the ministerial salaries) puts Singapore in a bad light
in the eyes of the world. The rest of Singaporeans really put in an
honest days work for every penny they earn. And the process for review
and approval of the ministerial salaries is also a joke. Imagine
sitting on the board and approving (on White Paper)your own salary
increments! Its all a wayang show".
This also raises the question as to the authenticity of the actual
process for review and approval of cabinet minister's salaries. Who
decides on these numbers? Is there independence and transparency?
Veteran opposition figure J.B. Jeyaretnam on Wednesday, Nov 20, 2002
challenged Singapore government ministers to take a pay cut to show
they understand the economic hardships faced by the public. And the
over-riding concern is that Singapore's Ruling Elite are unable to
appreciate the economic hardship that the masses face in these tough
times.
The growing public resentment comes afew months after PM Goh's careless
comments that "lay-offs were not all bad", drew a backlash from the
public with a flood of e-mails being sent to the foreign press to
register public indignation.
Source Sg_Review group
Singapore Review welcomes honest feedback on this hotly debated topic.
You can Send your comments to the editor:
[email protected]To subscribe, simply send an e-mail to:
[email protected]