If it translates into a huge loss of votes, the irony will not be lost on those who have migrated to get away from this place and skipped NSOriginally posted by RaTtY81:jus a side note, will tis mervyn case cost more uproar than AntKF case?![]()
I think we still will, we all made our choices, and you're not fighting to save some people in white , but your own family, friends and your possessions.Originally posted by RaTtY81:haiz when the war come, will we still have the heart to defend tis land with tis melvyn case...
why not...Originally posted by RaTtY81:haiz when the war come, will we still have the heart to defend tis land with tis melvyn case...
Stop talking to your clone.Originally posted by LazerLordz:![]()
![]()
We'll never really know.
Wow, a common, shared clone.Originally posted by charlize:Stop talking to your clone.
It's doesn't look nice if people find out.
Colonel Benedict's benediction was pronounced upon Quitter Melvyn; he was painfully requested to furnish an “ang pow” of $5000 to alleviate public sentiments. Jail or fine? Which is fine? What kind of “firm action” should MINDEF take against “those who do not fulfil their duty”? Although Melvyn chose not to procreate in Singapore, “firm action” can still be taken.Originally posted by dragg:extracted from ST forum.
NS: Mindef studying adequacy of penalties
I REFER to Mr Henry Ong Ling Tiong's letter, 'Firm stand needed: Fine or jail' (ST, Nov 26), where he suggested that punishments for national-service defaulters in the Enlistment Act be reviewed. Members of Parliament have also filed a number of questions.
It is heartening to note the very strong support for national service shown by the public in its reaction to the case of pianist Melvyn Tan.
Mindef has been reviewing the Enlistment Act to bring it up to date. This review includes a careful study of the adequacy of the current penalties to allow for firm action to be taken against those who do not fulfil their duty.
Mindef will give a full response on the matter when the review is completed.
Col Benedict Lim
Director, Public Affairs
Ministry of Defence
Extracted from Sammyboy. Funny!!!!Originally posted by dragg:extracted from ST forum.
NS: Mindef studying adequacy of penalties
I REFER to Mr Henry Ong Ling Tiong's letter, 'Firm stand needed: Fine or jail' (ST, Nov 26), where he suggested that punishments for national-service defaulters in the Enlistment Act be reviewed. Members of Parliament have also filed a number of questions.
It is heartening to note the very strong support for national service shown by the public in its reaction to the case of pianist Melvyn Tan.
Mindef has been reviewing the Enlistment Act to bring it up to date. This review includes a careful study of the adequacy of the current penalties to allow for firm action to be taken against those who do not fulfil their duty.
Mindef will give a full response on the matter when the review is completed.
Col Benedict Lim
Director, Public Affairs
Ministry of Defence
bwahahahahahahaOriginally posted by M©+square:Extracted from Sammyboy. Funny!!!!
Poster: -
I think Mindeaf did did a short survey like this.
Col Tan to Captain Lee. Go do a short survey to check if we have strong unwavering support for our NS programme.
Capt Lee called the whole platoon of NS Clerks out.
Capt Lee: Do you support NS?
Clerks: Yes Sir.
Capt Lee: Say again?
Clerks: Yes Sir!
Capt Lee to Col Tan: Sire, we got 100% support.
A terrace house in Thomson, Sembawang or Serangoon Gardens.Originally posted by lionnoisy:STimes 01.12.2005 reported his bond of $30,000 was forfeited 30 years ago.
Is it a 3 rm flat costed 10,000 to 15,000 30 years ago?
If so,his parents lost 300,000 in today value.
What u can bought 30 yrs ago for $30,000?
Pl check for me.
but some died...Originally posted by Salman:Most people don't bleed and some don't sweat doing NS.
the f u c k is wrong with this paper-pusher? fu cking shame on wearing the uniform...i hope you dont lose sleep at night from writing this f u c k ing piece of c r a p...how do you even be able to look into the eye of another soldierOriginally posted by dragg:extracted from ST forums.
I REFER to Mr Liew Kai Khiun's letter, 'Are NSmen's sweat and tears worth only $5,000?', and Mr Samuel Oh Chee Ooi's letter, 'What is Mindef's stand on draft dodgers?' (ST, Nov 22).
All able-bodied male Singapore citizens are required to serve national service to contribute to the peace, security and stability of the country. Singaporeans enjoy the socio-economic benefits that this stability brings and are expected to shoulder the responsibility of national defence.
Mindef takes a serious stand on all defaulters who evade their national-service duty. Defaulters will have to bear the consequences of their action and will be dealt with by the courts under the Enlistment Act.
They are, on conviction, liable for an imprisonment term not exceeding three years or a fine not exceeding $5,000, or both. The exact sentence will be determined by the courts.
Besides having to answer to the courts for their national-service offences, defaulters will also have to serve their national service if they are still liable for national service.
In the case of Mr Melvyn Tan, although he had renounced his Singapore citizenship in 1978, he remained liable for the national-service offence and has been dealt with by the courts in accordance with the Enlistment Act.
Colonel Benedict Lim
Director, Public Affairs
Ministry of Defence
Say only lah.Originally posted by dragg:front page tday says those who escaped NS will be jailed.
good idea.Originally posted by av98m:Ooohh...I hope the heckling takes place. Maybe an entire reservist unit should buy tickets and show up in their No.4. Nah....they'll probably be charged, fined and jailed for disturbing the peace.
How much do you want to bet that the police will be called and anyone in uniform will not be allowed into the concert?Originally posted by dragg:good idea.
imagine the hall is full of people in no 4. he will be extremely embarassed.