Originally posted by depressed:
Two months' early disruption saves full-time NSmen a year
I REFER to Mr Evan Ong Chin Wei's letter regarding national-service disruption (ST, Nov 29). It is not only ITE graduates who have to wait 10 months and delay their entry to polytechnics by a year because they are not allowed to disrupt two months earlier.
My son was enlisted in early January and needs to serve 22 months so he will ORD early next November. He has been given a place in an overseas university whose academic year commences in early September.
I wrote to Mindef to appeal for early disruption so that he could enter the university next September. I was given a similar answer as Mr Ong. This means my son will have to wait 10 months and can enrol only in 2007. There are many others in his batch who are in the same predicament. With the reduction of NS from 2 1/2 to two years, it would make sense for them to continue their studies sooner.
YO! wheres the SAF 7th Core Value Care For Soldiers? Another example of how NS men are treated like slaves of the country.
see the part i highlighted in red.
SAF cant possibly allow the many others in the batch to disrupt right? it will set precedence and the next thing you know everybody will be asking for early discharge.
i think it is difficult, if not impossible for SAF to response positively. there are so many people serving at any one time. such occurences are inevitable.