I believe they will push to give judicial authority back to the judges.The death penalty will stay, but I believe the Court of Appeal will have the final say.Originally posted by alwaysdisturbed:dis is bad...
even if they dun throw it back they wun b able to make the decision too rite?Originally posted by LazerLordz:I believe they will push to give judicial authority back to the judges.The death penalty will stay, but I believe the Court of Appeal will have the final say.
This is needed for our judiciary to mature, and ensure judicial authority in a Westminster system is not already weakened further by parliamentary legislation created by a executive which also makes up the majority of the legislature.
Can you elaborate?Originally posted by alwaysdisturbed:even if they dun throw it back they wun b able to make the decision too rite?
Both.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Can you elaborate?
Are you referring to the fact that the judges can't have the final say in the death penalty or that the Law Society can't do much?![]()
As I was saying, one of the best things they could do is to recommend a legislative amendment to remove mandatory sentencing and let the Supreme Court have the final say in all capital crimes.Originally posted by charlize:Both.
I'm sad to admit that I agree with you on this....Originally posted by charlize:The Law Society can recommend all it wants.
But at the end of the day, any new law or law amendments have to be passed through Parliament.
So who do you think has the final say?
Clout my friend, clout.The Law Society is made up of influential lawyers and MPs.Originally posted by charlize:The Law Society can recommend all it wants.
But at the end of the day, any new law or law amendments have to be passed through Parliament.
So who do you think has the final say?
The USA is the most influential nation in the world...and they have more executions than Singapore.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Clout my friend, clout.The Law Society is made up of influential lawyers and MPs.
There is an air of change, if you can feel it.Parliament needs to look ahead and understand what is in the long-term interest of Singapore, especially in the international arena.The trend today is for nations to fall in line towards international standards as far as possible without compromising national interests.
In fact, it is known that Singapore advocates the strengthening of international law.So that makes one plausible factor that speaks for this evolution.Keeping the death penalty will sooth the conservatives, while empowering the judiciary will strengthen our democratic institutions and also improve our image as a whole.
dat was wat i was tryin to ask...Originally posted by charlize:The Law Society can recommend all it wants.
But at the end of the day, any new law or law amendments have to be passed through Parliament.
So who do you think has the final say?
because they have more people lah bodok.Of course rite everything s more in US than here.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:The USA is the most influential nation in the world...and they have more executions than Singapore.
Originally posted by The Count of Monte-Cristo:yes of course ... but if that court was effective ... there wouldn't be a need for any courts of justice then, would it ? .....
There is a higher court than courts of justice and that is the court of conscience. It supercedes all other courts.
- [b] Mahatma Gandhi[/b]
Sadly, the USA is also the world's biggest hypocrite.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:The USA is the most influential nation in the world...and they have more executions than Singapore.