Originally posted by huaqing:
i agree to a certain extent.
my history teacher whose husband is in navy says that even if other countries attack singapore they also cannot do anything as singapore has the most advanced weapons in the world.
so i think there is no need for singapore to form alliance system with other nations...
You believe your teacher when she says that we have 'the most advanced weapons in the world'? Do you think we have nuclear ICBMs, stealth bombers and aircraft carriers? Do you think we have the ultimate capability to thrash any invading army with absolutely zero casualties just because we have 'the most advanced weapons in the world' (which we don't)?
Hogwash, I say. It'll be hell for any enemy to conquer us, but they can really give us a bloody nose if they want to. I agree that we can't depend on alliances, but it'll still be good to have them anyway. Better have 10% chance of someone else helping us than 0%, I say.
It's extremely narrow-minded to judge that alliances are useless based merely on the experiences of WWI. Just over twenty years later in WWII the Allied armies of France, UK, US and the others rose to defeat Hitler. In 1999 the NATO alliance bombed Yugoslavia in the Kosovo War.