Originally posted by alien2:i believe a better design will improve the overall image of both countries. whether its redundant or otherwise we all know it. you need not emphasize the number of earning workers from across the causeway to prove your intellect because there are equally huge numbers of the other side of the people who cross the bridge just to eat, drink and be merry....that is to spend in msia.
Quoted from[b]the bridge is redundant......
______________________________
under common sense or nonsense or what's your own selfish reasons? Money or friendship ? There are over 1000 buses daily moving into Spore to carry workers from across the way. and the old causeway is too narrow and needed a new bridge after more than so many year of waiting.. what you think all Malaysians who come here to work want? Be considerate and think of our neighbors first![/b]
The east Msians have been exploited by buggers in KL.Originally posted by BadzMaro:I say Malaysian government should give more budget to Sarawak and Sabah since they contribute the most in anual revenue but is given the least during the Malaysian Plans. Half of petronas towers $$$ is from these 2 states.. now more being taken to build the bridge! the Millinieum bird, all these white elephants and not doing things by meritocracy. MY needs more capable leaders to lead and manage the countries affairs and budgets! It is already beggining the 90% bumi policy on all high level positions. n Mahatir shouldn't be talking so much since he is already out of the spotlight and allow Badawi to lead the administration to ease the strain in relationships with its neighbours.
Well, they also think that it'll be more difficult for us to cross over.... But seriously, who needs the causeway to launch an attack? Johor Straits to not a difficult obstacle for any modern army to cross.Originally posted by tiggersgd:its more than just a new bridge to faciliate commerce activities for the msians (sea ports) or that the 'river' may flow 'better?!!' blar blar blar...
have we also forgotten that during the WWII when the japanese cross the causeway with relative ease towards singapore? yes, i mean from another approach, its about msian national defence towards singapore in the event of the unlikely.
having an S approach towards the end of the johor causeway should prove somewhat difficult for any army to maneuver across the curve.
having the height not only so that it will become another physical obstacle (besides the S curve), it is so that the other side (msian) may have an advantage to whatever it is going to launch. remember singapore is a small country and any heighten structure can be a potent source of forward observation.
Brits blew up the causeway to stop invading Japanese. Fast forward 70 years later, will the same tactic make ANY difference with air-lift mechanised armour, artillery and modern bridging technique ?Originally posted by lotus999:littlespeck has thisinfo to offer:
So even a crooked half-bridge would have a defence value for Malaysia. A raised drawbridge could stop the Singaporean tanks from crossing into Johor in the unlikely event of war.
Mahathir is damn stupid.Originally posted by BlurBlur1:
Do u think Dr.Mahathir is Very very Smart and he is telling the truth.
He inspire his country people to do the smart direction to build the cynic bridge and singapore people now are afraid.![]()
Originally posted by Salman:The east Malaysian state of Sarawak and Sabah had actually tried to secede from Malaysia and joined up with Singapore during the tumultous period of the 1960 politics.
The east Msians have been exploited by buggers in KL.
They shld have joined Singapore.
Originally posted by Salman:IF - "Mahathir is damn stupid" - at least he was a PM of Malaysia, while your "stupidity" - as reflected in your regular "no brainer. one-liners" - only qualify you to an insignificant mid-level administrative post in some unknown "small company for small minded people" (
Mahathir is damn stupid.
Thats why even the msians don't listen to him now.
Originally posted by Atobe:corrections!
IF - "Mahathir is oxymoronic" - at least he was a PM of Malaysia, while your "stupidity" - as reflected in your regular "no brainer. one-liners" - only qualify you to an insignificant mid-level administrative post in some unknown "small company for small minded people" (
)
Should anyone in this sgForum take you seriously, and listen to you ? .
Can you be comparable to Mahathir in his [b]stupendous reputation and greatness ? .
[/b]

Originally posted by Atobe:I don't think mahathir is great by any measure.
IF - "Mahathir is damn stupid" - at least he was a PM of Malaysia, while your "stupidity" - as reflected in your regular "no brainer. one-liners" - only qualify you to an insignificant mid-level administrative post in some unknown "small company for small minded people" ()
Should anyone in this sgForum take you seriously, and listen to you ? .
Can you be comparable to Mahathir in his [b]stupendous reputation and greatness ? .
[/b]
Originally posted by Salman:By your 'no brainer' standard - can anyone be great ? .
I don't think mahathir is great by any measure.
He made Msia corrupt and the police perpetuators of human rights.

Would it not be surprising if the "10%" title is worth something more than that of a "no brainer, one-liner" ?Originally posted by Salman:How can a corrupt guy be handsome? I think he looks like shits. Mahathir is known worldwide as mr.10%. He didn't get that name for nothin buddy.
Frankly the causeway to Singapore army is nothing. We don't need it in military sense, because only an idiot would try to send an army using it when the other side will sure to mine it , and put every damn artillery and gun at it.Originally posted by tiggersgd:its more than just a new bridge to faciliate commerce activities for the msians (sea ports) or that the 'river' may flow 'better?!!' blar blar blar...
have we also forgotten that during the WWII when the japanese cross the causeway with relative ease towards singapore? yes, i mean from another approach, its about msian national defence towards singapore in the event of the unlikely.
having an S approach towards the end of the johor causeway should prove somewhat difficult for any army to maneuver across the curve.
having the height not only so that it will become another physical obstacle (besides the S curve), it is so that the other side (msian) may have an advantage to whatever it is going to launch. remember singapore is a small country and any heighten structure can be a potent source of forward observation.
Originally posted by alien2:will the new bridge be broader than the causeway, can handle the train service and allow water pipe to run across??
Quoted from[b]the bridge is redundant......
______________________________
under common sense or nonsense or what's your own selfish reasons? Money or friendship ? There are over 1000 buses daily moving into Spore to carry workers from across the way. and the old causeway is too narrow and needed a new bridge after more than so many year of waiting.. what you think all Malaysians who come here to work want? Be considerate and think of our neighbors first![/b]
Originally posted by alien2:the bridge is redundant!!
Quoted from[b]the bridge is redundant......
______________________________
under common sense or nonsense or what's your own selfish reasons? Money or friendship ? There are over 1000 buses daily moving into Spore to carry workers from across the way. and the old causeway is too narrow and needed a new bridge after more than so many year of waiting.. what you think all Malaysians who come here to work want? Be considerate and think of our neighbors first![/b]