Originally posted by Atobe:wah lau if you are businessman will you choose to go for a gem company that already have a pretty big slice of the market with infrastructures and everything in place or will you go for a small ikan bili company that still need to pump in alot of money and fight with the big boys for a bigger market share?
Is Temasek "hated" for its business raids overseas - buying up the 'gem' companies in Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Hong Kong, China, Korea, USA, UK, India, and Timbuctoo ?
"Hated" maybe too heavy and too strong a word that do not accurately reflect the emotions of the nationals of the countries that Temasek has targetted.
"Resentment" is more likely to accurately understand the emotional feelings against Temasek's aggressive forays in buying established companies.
Businessweek Report : [b]Stalled in Singapore may offer an accurate assessment of the people whose country Temasek had raided.
[/b]
Would you be afraid if suddenly government related companies from around the region started buying up SingTel, SIA and DBS?Originally posted by dragg:i think wary is the right word to use instead of hated.
Are the majority of our GLCs that attractive?Originally posted by ShutterBug:Hmm.. how come we don't read about government link companies from other countries wanting a share of our own GLCs?
Are you saying our GLCs CMI?Originally posted by LazerLordz:Are the majority of our GLCs that attractive?![]()
that is exactly what temasek is doing.Originally posted by charlize:Would you be afraid if suddenly government related companies from around the region started buying up SingTel, SIA and DBS?
So you understand how people from other countries feel when people from our side start throwing money at them and start buying up their national assets.Originally posted by dragg:that is exactly what temasek is doing.
of course i do.Originally posted by charlize:So you understand how people from other countries feel when people from our side start throwing money at them and start buying up their national assets.
it take two hand to clap man. it not our fault to buy their national assets, they have the right to reject, but if they going to sell due to the temptation then it their fault isn't it?Originally posted by charlize:So you understand how people from other countries feel when people from our side start throwing money at them and start buying up their national assets.
of course the seller only cares about profit. but the citizens of a country see it differently. selling to another private company is unlike selling to temasek, which is actually the singapore govt.Originally posted by strikefreedom:it take two hand to clap man. it not our fault to buy their national assets, they have the right to reject, but if they going to sell due to the temptation then it their fault isn't it?
what we want to gain from doing business? it profit it money, as long as there are opportunity out there that can earn more money who will say no?![]()
if you bring in citizen view and feeling it mean you are mixing business with emotion and in business world sadly to say they don't come hand in hand.Originally posted by dragg:of course the seller only cares about profit. but the citizens of a country see it differently. selling to another private company is unlike selling to temasek, which is actually the singapore govt.
The problem here is not the business part, but the fact that in very real sense we are controlling their strategic assts. They are just concern about having another country's gov in the controlling seat I guess.Originally posted by strikefreedom:if you bring in citizen view and feeling it mean you are mixing business with emotion and in business world sadly to say they don't come hand in hand.
well selling to who no one can control cos who can pay more of course sell to them lah. will you say no to higher profit? just becos the company is own by goverment and feel dissent abt it, i think that is pretty childish from a business point of view.
we got to realise that if it not Temasek that bought it, some other company will so why let ppl have such a good opportunity if we can have this opportunity to ourself right?
same thing with optus, when singtel bought over it, aussies start to protest, grumble etc, but two week into it no one even bother man. this is just a common passing phase.
at the end of the day, if they can provide a very competitive services to the ppl you see they will say no and go for other company?
by concerning about their thinking is already mixing emotion and business together isn't it? and in business world you don't do that though it may look like hard hearted but it a something that is needed if we want to profit in that business.Originally posted by lighthand:The problem here is not the business part, but the fact that in very real sense we are controlling their strategic assts. They are just concern about having another country's gov in the controlling seat I guess.
Though I wish Temasek would be more open. I agree with LHL that if other country don't want Temasek, temasek won't go there.
I think you are not really understanding what I mean. Look at it from the view point of their people, if lets say today Temasek took over the controlling interest of a big company that has up to 3000 people under its pay-roll. What will happen if (big if here hor) Temasek should break up the company, strip it of it's most valuable assets and sells it off. What do you think will happen to those 3000 people? Normal business will be a large-scale lay-off rite?Originally posted by strikefreedom:by concerning about their thinking is already mixing emotion and business together isn't it? and in business world you don't do that though it may look like hard hearted but it a something that is needed if we want to profit in that business.
Do the governments of other countries form GLC?Originally posted by ShutterBug:Hmm.. how come we don't read about government link companies from other countries wanting a share of our own GLCs?