Originally posted by countdracula:
how can it not be propaganda, the excerpts you drew reference are not new. this were speculated in the arab world...the isreali plot an so forth....look, as much as i think bush and the american foriegn policy sucks big time, i am reasoned enough to distinguish between fact and fiction. out of some novelist plot you are trying to convince the world that this is not the work of middle eastern arab muslim terrorists? they openely admitted so, so don't try to read into what is not there. they are many things for some reason things are witheld and at best the information pieced together by you are conjectures, and a very bad one at that.
No, they were initially not. Those except were duly reported by American's media days following the 9/11 incident. They were sidelined by fox and CNN. ABC news carried that initial reporting from police transcript, but the news was pulled out from all sources about 1 1/2 yrs later.
I'm not saying that 9/11 were not the work of arabs, But those the arabs identified by the US authorities were named just 1 day from the 9/11 incident. The thing is, if it would a surprise, how were they named in lightning speed. Now, almost two third of them are infact alive.. leaves a questionable point... doesn't it ?
How about WTC7 ? It was not hit by the planes and is not the nearest building to the twin towers. Well, it collapsed moments after tower 1. Only visial damage were sustained on the 8 level, after the first tower collapse. Why did it collapse at all ? No plane hit and minor damage.....