I felt sad especially for those US soldiers as well as the other allied nation.Originally posted by LazerLordz:They were lied to. It happens everywhere, and factions in power are threatened by those who are able to undermine their reality.
It was the Vietnam draft that forced the voting age in USA to be lowered from 21 to 18 back in the swinging '60s. However, few young Americans bother to vote these days.Originally posted by will4:I felt sad especially for those US soldiers as well as the other allied nation.
Majority of those survivor required psychological healthcare.
PTSD is a major problem for US soldiers. If they can know this will happen like
no purpose conflict, majority will run away. In fact, during the Vietnam conflict
US still practice conscription, some of the preenlistees awol to Canada or Australia.
haha not qualified to have lah...Originally posted by iveco:Wilco, out.
So when can I see you having power to ban like FI does?![]()
But you score higher than FI and Nick34 on the impartiality scale.Originally posted by CenturionMBT:haha not qualified to have lah...
yesOriginally posted by will4:U mean the dunking incident involving the red beret?
i tremble for singapore's future because while they r rid of 'bad rubbish' like me, they still have worse rubbish like u, leeches who suck the blood of others to fatten yrself.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:So insults is all that you can offer? Thank God Singapore is rid of bad rubbish like you
![]()
YOUR impartiality scale?Originally posted by iveco:But you score higher than FI and Nick34 on the impartiality scale.![]()
now this is one argument that is persuasive.Originally posted by HENG@:YOUR impartiality scale?
i see u're a very good measure of impartiality hor
the fact that FI hasn't kicked yr sorry ass off here yet, shows shes the most impartial person here.
Can't agree more with you. The FTs are here for the "peanuts" as stated by an FT (sg****) in another thread even though he has done NS (so he claimed).Originally posted by Marco_Simone:Those foreign talent would be the first to run at the first sign of any trouble...![]()
How come everybody thinking Spore will have conflict with other country? I think they should concentrate on terrorism, the most concerning matter.Originally posted by Calvin86:If ask most Singaporeans, i dont think anyone thinks that a war will break out.
The real test should be when most Singaporeans think there will be a war and how many actually stay.
Somehow i think you chose your name for some significance, please dont be Siaokao and chase me hor
I assumed Calvin86 had already served his NS n this is his contribution. Let say he need to go back for ICT, he can go back to unit n can report sick.Originally posted by sgdiehard:I dont think I am the JFK type and I am certrainly influenced by the American.
I am just an ordinary singaporean, not born here but have spent almost my entire life here, my family and friends are here and all my physical assets are here. Defending singapore is the same as defending everything I have. how the present government, the future government would run Singapore would affect the values of what I have but it does not eliminate what I have totally, singapore occupied by foreigners does!!
to me a country is like a home, I will defend my home no matter how I dislike the way things are done at home. I was born into my family, din't bring anything when I came.
watch the movies "saving private ryan", "black hawk down", "tears of the sun" just to name a few? I wonder what question would Calvin86 ask if he has to risk his life to save another, to fight somebody else war?? I guess there is only one answer that will satisfy him, "fight any war you like, as long as he does not have to fight."
there is never an answer to such question, "would you fight for Singapore if....ministers continue to draw high salary.....costs of living continues to be high....pap continue to run the country.....there continues to be a lack of transparency in the way our reserves are managed......?"
I thought the only sensible response to such question is what this Calvin86 has to contribute to our country, like he were a key player in the defence of singapore (without him the SAF would collapes at the sight of an enemy).
Now he has to ask another 50 other guys, ....hmm....in the meantime, I believe when he receives the order to report back to camp, he would lan lan.... report for duty sir!
come on man, you are so selfish.Originally posted by Calvin86:Would you fight for Singapore if the Singapore Govt decides to increase to the population to 6-7 million?
I wouldnt stake my life for a place where there is little difference between foreigners and locals. Singapore is one of the few uniques places where it has a large foreign workforce and yet relies on a reservist army from citizens to defend it.
If the population increases to 6-7 million in future, i am not ashamed to say i would flee Singapore in times of war. Why should i defend the assets of foreigners?
http://www.singapore-window.org/sw06/060226st.htm
Invaders do not care if it is raining or not. If their hearts are set on conquering us, they will do it no matter what the weather is like.Originally posted by king108:Refer to the rally spoken by WP..on the raining day..I think they are wrong about defencing singapore. Actually PM Lee and his group of Ministers cared for their supporter. This is why they choosed to have their rallies in door in case of rain and light strike.
Only thing, I can say is that supporters for WP and other parties are really..."Bu Kia Shii"![]()
We can alway tell the invader or terrorists no to attack us on raining days..why no..
Couldn't agree more.Originally posted by expiringpoet:what is this???
NO ONE should fight. Its not right. Its not the way to settle differences, no matter what any government tells you or does.
If the people resolve not to fight (on both sides) then the government will have no choice but to setlle differences - let the powers that be that decide to go to war personally go and battle it out themselves. Why should innocent life be wasted becos of politics and one person's ambitions?
stupid, stupid, stupid....