Singapore ruled by one party or democracy?
-
so? ruled by wad? i bet $100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 pap this election surely walk over de. promise so much things, but then hor got fulfil lar...dun know leh.. cant think of any other party which can do a better job than pap.. so wad? ruled by party or democracy?
-
What's your point.. name one other party that you will be certain that they can confidently run Singapore just as well. Noting that Singapore is small.
Japan is also a basically a One party rule.. and has for 50 years+
US so-called "leader of democracy" has basically a two party rule for decades. It's either a conservative or Republican, and all the back benches have only served that two parties only. -
When the Ruling Political Party has persecuted all abled politicians and driven them away from Singapore, can any political party have the opportunity to prove that they are more able to " do a better job that pap " ?Originally posted by mylifemyrules:so? ruled by wad? i bet $100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 pap this election surely walk over de. promise so much things, but then hor got fulfil lar...dun know leh.. cant think of any other party which can do a better job than pap.. so wad? ruled by party or democracy?
If the Ruling Political Party has dismantled all forms of DEMOCRACY in Singapore, except for the skeleton framework, can anyone practise even the most basic and simplest form of Democracy - that is to have a Choice ? -
Do u have the logic that democracy must have alternative
parties to rule?
Is so ,here in Sg is not an democratic country lah.
Take a good look fr USA,UK and other so called
developed countries,to India democracy for 50 years,
to our neighbours how their lifes are ruled by
different parties?
DUNT rule SG by western political books.
We will end up earn a living in rubbish mountains.
2.Single party like Sg rule can give us reasonable living.
But not alternative parties!!
Why?Only the people in power resist corruption.
What is a big deal to give them fat salary when our
neighbours close families of powerful people
earn much more money in other biz?? -
so what?. It was the people choice since 1965. However after a long period of time, the rule of the game changed to the benefit of the ruling party. Thus, the walkover. However, these people can still be voted out if the people make the choice in the future election.
-
Originally posted by lionnoisy:
Please look at Iceland, Sweden and the Nordic nations before you shoot your mouth off again.
Do u have the logic that democracy must have alternative
parties to rule?
Is so ,here in Sg is not an democratic country lah.
Take a good look fr USA,UK and other so called
developed countries,to India democracy for 50 years,
to our neighbours how their lifes are ruled by
different parties?
DUNT rule SG by western political books.
We will end up earn[b] a living in rubbish mountains.
2.Single party like Sg rule can give us reasonable living.
But not alternative parties!!
Why?Only the people in power resist corruption.
What is a big deal to give them fat salary when our
neighbours close families of powerful people
earn much more money in other biz??
[/b]
Your love for the nation is clouding your eyes to the truth and the alternatives. -
Look at Singapore from 1965 to now....
The government claims that it is a democratic country.... But in reality it is really difficult to believe that; especially politically. In fact, the government is dominated by the PAP.
Does this look like a "one-party" state?
