How about non-conformist ex-President Ong Teng Cheong?

Monday • May 16, 2005
EX-PRESIDENTS ALL DESERVE STATE FUNERALS
Lack of a clear policy is puzzling
Like many other Singaporeans, I am both puzzled and saddened over the non-accordance of a state funeral for former president Ong Teng Cheong who passed away in February 2002.
To me, the reply from Mr Chen Hwai Liang, the press secretary to the Prime Minister ("Honour rites still evolving" May 14 — 15) has only added to the confusion as to who qualifies for the state funeral and who does not.
Mr Chen said a person's "rank or the appointment that he or she had held" need not necessarily determine if a state funeral would be accorded, as it "depends on the person's services to the nation, as well as other special circumstances".
In the hearts and minds, knowledge and understanding, of many Singaporeans, Mr Ong had served us well since 1972 – whether as a Member of Parliament (MP), minister, labour chief or as our first elected president.
Even before entering politics, he contributed as a grassroots volunteer in Seletar Hills.
What about his firm beliefs and convictions over the positive impact of the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system, during the transportation debate in the early 1980s?
Have we forgotten the significance of the three committees headed by Mr Ong: the Moral Education Committee (1979), Advisory Council on Art and Culture (1989) and the Chinese Language Review Committee (1992) which led to significant changes in our society today?
I agree that "when Singaporeans who have made major contributions to the country pass away, it is right and fitting that they be honoured and mourned by the nation", regardless of whether they may or may not be former presidents.
However, isn't it clear that Mr Ong's contributions merited such appreciation?
In any case, the actions of former presidents Ong and Wee Kim Wee have taught us valuable lessons in life: Be it about humility, sincerity, graciousness, courage, concern for others, and so son. We should remember and appreciate them in the years to come.
It is pointless to have bridges or airports named after them if, years down the road, our children do not even know their significance to Singapore. Yet again, the naming of key buildings or structures in memory of them would help future generations understand.
For a start, I suggest renaming Changi Airport and the new Low Cost Carriers (LCCs) terminal as the Ong Teng Cheong Airport and Wee Kim Wee Terminal. With the emergence of LCCs, more families and ordinary Singaporeans are able to enjoy the luxury of travelling.
And given the humble backgrounds of both former presidents, it is apt that the airport and terminal are named in their memory.
Mr Chen's point that our practices and customs for public ceremonies and observations are "still evolving", seems contrary to Singapore's reputation for careful organisation and planning.
It is most unusual that there is no definite policy or rules regarding a state funeral.
It is ironic that a president is given the honour of the nation's salute on National Day, and yet when it comes to his funeral ceremony, the Prime Minister and his Cabinet have the final say.
Any president, whether outstanding or mediocre, should be given respect and recognition.
Letters from Jason Lee Boon Hong and Ho Chan Sian