India's Sonia Gandhi resigns from parliament
-
This is what happen when you have too many political speakers in the country.
-
WRONG - this is what happens in a DEMOCRACY - where NO ONE will be sued into bankruptcy when the TRUTH is spoken.Originally posted by Gazelle:This is what happen when you have too many political speakers in the country.
If the 'TRUTH' spoken is found to be in error, and the person who had said it was proven to have done so IN GOOD FAITH, and WITHOUT PERSONAL MALICE towards the person wronged, A PUBLIC APOLOGY would have been sufficient for redress to be made to everyone's PUBLIC HONOR.
It is only in the Singapore form of DESTRUCTIVE MONOPOLISTIC DEMOCRACY according to the interpretation and views from the POWER OF ONE - that we have a sham Democracy that is touted by the Ruling Elite to be non-Liberal.
Either there is DEMOCRACY or there is NONE - can a Parliament be a half-way house ? -
hear hear! u've hit the nail square on the head.Originally posted by Atobe:WRONG - this is what happens in a DEMOCRACY - where NO ONE will sued when the TRUTH is spoken.
If the 'TRUTH' spoken is found to be in error, and the person who had said it was proven to have done so IN GOOD FAITH, and WITHOUT PERSONAL MALICE towards the person wronged, A PUBLIC APOLOGY would have been sufficient for redress to everyone's PUBLIC HONOR.
It is only in the Singapore form of DESTRUCTIVE MONOPOLISTIC DEMOCRACY according to the interpretation and views from the POWER OF ONE - that we have a sham Democracy that is touted by the Ruling Elite to be non-Liberal.
Either there is DEMOCRACY or there is NONE - can a Parliament be a half-way house ? -
The question is is democracy good for a big country like India?Originally posted by Atobe:WRONG - this is what happens in a DEMOCRACY - where NO ONE will be sued into bankruptcy when the TRUTH is spoken.
If the 'TRUTH' spoken is found to be in error, and the person who had said it was proven to have done so IN GOOD FAITH, and WITHOUT PERSONAL MALICE towards the person wronged, A PUBLIC APOLOGY would have been sufficient for redress to be made to everyone's PUBLIC HONOR.
It is only in the Singapore form of DESTRUCTIVE MONOPOLISTIC DEMOCRACY according to the interpretation and views from the POWER OF ONE - that we have a sham Democracy that is touted by the Ruling Elite to be non-Liberal.
Either there is DEMOCRACY or there is NONE - can a Parliament be a half-way house ? -
The question is not so much if a "Democracy is good for a big country like India, or even a small country like Singapore" - when the question should be "how the country and - or its people - is familiar with the functions and concepts of Democracy" ?Originally posted by Gazelle:The question is is democracy good for a big country like India?
Comparing India with China - both are vast countries with a huge population, the educated that form the ELITE in the respective countries have existed in two different systems - one in a Democratic System, and the other in a Communist System.
Unfortunately both countries faced corruption despite both taking different paths in their political development for their respective countries, and having different economic priorities with their economic plans.
In a Democracy such as India, corruption can easily be exposed, while in China some whistle-blowers have been jailed while the perpetrators remain scot-free.
Is Democracy good for any country ?
It depends on how you and I have been molded into which kind of PROPAGANDA, how each of us have been brought up in which environment, and how we see the past, the present, and what we expect of the FUTURE with the past and present system of Government.