Ok totally agree on these points. But still, the choice of youths could have been betterOriginally posted by the Bear:i do not mean each person.. i mean he owes his country..
and the youth represent the future of his country.. the country.. OUR country..
if he is dismissive and looks at them with contempt, treats them with derision and puts them down without listening to their worries, he's lost his right to lead, he's forgotten what it means to be a normal citizen..
by the way, as a "democracy", the youths were doing the right thing.. and that is to take their politicians, their leaders, the people in power, to task... that is the duty and responsibility of the citizenry of a mature people...
besides, everyone knows... if the leaders are not taken to task, TT Durai and NKF happens
Hahahah.....Originally posted by the Bear:one more thing to add..
at my workplace, when my officers are right, and the member of the public is wrong but still very buey kam guan.... they will make a complaint...
guess what?
"your officer very rude"
when they fail in trying to be right with the facts, they will resort to personal attacks like that..
"were the young rude to MM?" or... "you young whippersnappers very rude"
Originally posted by kAdEn:Hahahah.....
But i think MM was trying to soft sell his idea. And when it didn't work, he tried to hard sell them...don't think there was any menace meant like the above.
hmm.. thats old fashioned thinking lah. they still think he is god and believes he should be revered; even if hes not up to the job also give him face. i believe if hes not up to the job we should just throw him away....Originally posted by 798:yesterday my supervisor n colleagues were discussing bout it. they find the young quite rude n disrespect to gahman. i told them dat gahman also nvr gave them freedom to speak. but they gave me tis, "MM is a leader afterall n he has the right to make his speech clear. i believe no workers will try to talk rudely to their boss."
i was speechless... quite true...
That is not rudeness.Rudeness comes when you attack the person and his style, not his message.Originally posted by 798:yesterday my supervisor n colleagues were discussing bout it. they find the young quite rude n disrespect to gahman. i told them dat gahman also nvr gave them freedom to speak. but they gave me tis, "MM is a leader afterall n he has the right to make his speech clear. i believe no workers will try to talk rudely to their boss."
i was speechless... quite true...
Too bad, the idea of Father knows best is something I never recognized.Originally posted by CoolMyth:If one's talking about MM being the boss and we the workers, again, same point as said earlier.
Being the boss doesn't imply you get to rule over workers' heads and overrule everything else they say/simply brush it off.
But then again, that's my opinion with regards to the casino issue.
Maybe we just have to acknowledge the "idea" that "I'm higher rank than you and therefore I 0wn u!"![]()
Fear of man in authority = candidates for a chicken state.Originally posted by Medicated Oil:The Dialogue only show the various reporters trying to push their questions with a limited time given.
They should have sort out their agenda before they talk with MM.
They are just going round in circles with the demand of fair political playing field for Singapore.
They were too anxious in putting their questions through and did not really mean to be rude to MM Lee.
Sad to say, some of the Singaporeans are too brain-washed or chicken through dealing with man of authority that they are trying to label the youth as rude individual.
they're dam rude.Originally posted by zocoss:I saw a clip on CNA that said the young people at the interview were rude & disrespectful to the MM and it will be shown on this thur. Were they, do you think so? Or they were just doing their job?
Its never equal to begin with...Originally posted by babymac13:It's more like debate. Should look at them with equal status.
Then they should pick ppl from sgForums to head the discussion panel?Originally posted by Medicated Oil:The Dialogue only show the various reporters trying to push their questions with a limited time given.
They should have sort out their agenda before they talk with MM.
They are just going round in circles with the demand of fair political playing field for Singapore.
They were too anxious in putting their questions through and did not really mean to be rude to MM Lee.
Sad to say, some of the Singaporeans are too brain-washed or chicken through dealing with man of authority that they are trying to label the youth as rude individual.
ask robertteh and who could forget Salman.Originally posted by deathscythe99:Then they should pick ppl from sgForums to head the discussion panel?
Yes all of us like Lazerlord, Atobe, ...(many more) will make a good panel to de-salmanise MM Lee on a panel on TV with no hold barred.Originally posted by LazerLordz:ask robertteh and who could forget Salman.![]()
*cough* sarcasm *cough*Originally posted by boy in blues:they're dam rude.
loyal subjects shouldn't question the supreme authority of our beloved regime.
the fact that it's a Q&A session is no excuse.
they shouldn't ask him challenging questions on national TV,
the least they could do was 'ask' easy questions so he can claim credit for our nation's achievements![]()