the govt will probably say;Originally posted by ShutterBug:To some extent, some foreign investments & foreign talents are welcomed and good for our economy. But if it is allowed to SATURATE our population and industry (especially the employment market), we have a problem.
I think, our government (if they want to remain in power and always elected in future to come), they should put a LIMIT or CAP ceiling on the number of foreign talents and "foreign talents", into our market in general.
For once, I hope they start listening to us public voices.
Otherwise, winds of change, will slowly but surely, blow them away.
I think the government is trying to balance the needs, ie what type of foreign talents and the numbers to be allowed into Singapore. Other than the illegal immigrants, the number of foreign talents into Singapore is controlled (sort of). If you see more foreign talents into Singapore, it is because the government allows (approve) them.Originally posted by ShutterBug:To some extent, some foreign investments & foreign talents are welcomed and good for our economy. But if it is allowed to SATURATE our population and industry (especially the employment market), we have a problem.
I think, our government (if they want to remain in power and always elected in future to come), they should put a LIMIT or CAP ceiling on the number of foreign talents and "foreign talents", into our market in general.
For once, I hope they start listening to us public voices.
Otherwise, winds of change, will slowly but surely, blow them away.
One must also ask; "Why aren't locals taking these jobs that foreigners are so willing to take?" Well, for one, I cite the sheer number of highly or well educated people produced by the system. Do you think they'd settle for minial jobs? Does it tally with all the years of tertiary studies? Ok, so if a local excepts a lower salary and not be choosy. Do you think, a salary of $1500-$2000 (before CPF) can feed a family or take care of aging and sick parents??Originally posted by PatrickLTH:Remember, it is “these foreigners” who had build our houses, apartments, condominiums, roads, highways, ports, MRT, our “country”. It is the same “foreigners” who become Singaporean when Singapore was established.
I think it is not right to say PAP had allowed foreigners to rape our country. On the balance, the benefits of having “foreigners” out weight the negative aspects.
needless to say....why dont they pay us the equivalent of their peanuts salary for us to do those jobs. im sure we dont mind.Originally posted by Kariage:These are the facts that you must see before condemning PAP:
1. there are huge needs for construction worker. Does singaporean willing to take this job with only $700 - $1000 per month? The bangladeshi and Pakistani are okay with this job.
2. There are huge needs for nurses in our healthcare system. Does singaporean willing to do this job? No, most Singaporean thinks this job is no good and low paid... But the Filipino are okay with this job.
3. There are huge demand for maids. Does Singaporean willing to take this job with $250 to $400 per month? The indonesian and filipino are okay with this...
4. There are huge needs for factory workers. Does Singaporean willing to take this job with only $800 - $1200 per month? The chinese are okay with it...
5. There are openings in IT business. Singaporean are okay with this kind of job, but they expect high salary and bonusses... However indonesian, malaysian, filipino, chinese, and the indians are okay with a slightly lower salary and longer worktime.
6. There is a huge demand in the shipyard industry and container ports. Singaporean does not want the jobs since it is dangerous and low paid. However, the bangladeshi and indians are okay with it.
IF the government kick out all foreigner from Singapore:
1. Construction company will be gone... meeting higher salary demand to hire a Singaporean will increase the overhead of the company. HDB flats will be more expensive since the cost of building it will be higher.
2. Hospital bill will be higher, since singaporean health worker expect higher salary.
3. No maids for you... except if you are willing to pay $15 per hour for a singaporean maid.
4. Manufacturing cost will be higher. Soon all manufacturer will move to Vietnam/China/Indonesia
5. Big IT companies will move out from Singapore. Small IT companies will be closed down since the overhead cost will be too high.
6. The shipyards and container ports will move to a cheaper place.
The correct thing to do:
1. Let the foreigner do the dirty jobs, they are willing to do it with low salary. Singaporean should aim themself to do a higher status jobs. Someone who are not capable of doing higher status job can either stay jobless or downgrade their expectation. It is THEIR choice.
2. Don't worry about the numbers of PRs here. For example, in Bahrain, one of the developed country in the middle east, the amount of PRs are 3 times of their citizen. A problem? NO. Bahrain is one of the most prosperous country in the middle east.
What do you suggest then? What type of “circumstances” is best for Singapore (in your opinion)?Originally posted by ShutterBug:One must also ask; "Why aren't locals taking these jobs that foreigners are so willing to take?" Well, for one, I cite the sheer number of highly or well educated people produced by the system. Do you think they'd settle for minial jobs? Does it tally with all the years of tertiary studies? Ok, so if a local excepts a lower salary and not be choosy. Do you think, a salary of $1500-$2000 (before CPF) can feed a family or take care of aging and sick parents??
(i haven't even mentioned the stupid policies in place governing the use of Medisafe and CPF!!)
With higher educational levels, almost everyone wants to be the boss. Then who's left to be the average employee? Also note that there are those who can't study for a variety of reasons, and hence have no choice but to compete foreigners for minial manual labour jobs.
Then after all this hardship of trying to make a living, we face even bleaker prospects as old citizens - no employers wants old workers due to high medical costs, or for whatever fasionable reasons.
Who the hell, do you think created such circumstances????
thats why i have to go monashOriginally posted by vito_corleone:good universities will not accept people with crap results, whether its nus or melbourne or cambridge.![]()
![]()
Yes, being able to adapt is good. But WHAT is left to adapt to, is quite another issue.Originally posted by PatrickLTH:What do you suggest then? What type of “circumstances” is best for Singapore (in your opinion)?
Classify Singaporean into different classes? Like : Well educated will get good job like Office Manager. Less well educated will have to do manual works like Street Sweeper. Both classes will get the same pay as the Ministers. All get peanuts?
You think this well work? I do not think so.
What is the alternative then?
If I cannot come out with an alternative, I will try to make the best of what is available and work within the existing system. I will make sure I am well educated, earn more than the average people and live above the average. This is call adaptation.
Stop your grouses and upgrade your skills in gorwing industries. We have well-paying jobs for fund managers and researchers in the biomedical industries but we cannot find enough people to fill them. That's why we have to import PhDs from overseas..Originally posted by ShutterBug:Yes, being able to adapt is good. But WHAT is left to adapt to, is quite another issue.
Also, even if one has achieved high level of education, then what? Once you pass 40 and 50 onwards, what's left for you in terms of jobs? Will you be happy being an intellectual and well educated but are only offered low end jobs?
I've got friends who were once GMs and Directors, now driving cabs and mini-buses to make ends meet!!! They were once the workforce that contributed to Singapore's economic growth! Now forgotten...
WTF!
This bring to the point that one must learn to adapt, knowing that when one is pass 40 and 50 is considered over the hill, then one must learn and strive to save enough to retire at 40 and 50.Originally posted by ShutterBug:Yes, being able to adapt is good. But WHAT is left to adapt to, is quite another issue.
Also, even if one has achieved high level of education, then what? Once you pass 40 and 50 onwards, what's left for you in terms of jobs? Will you be happy being an intellectual and well educated but are only offered low end jobs?
I've got friends who were once GMs and Directors, now driving cabs and mini-buses to make ends meet!!! They were once the workforce that contributed to Singapore's economic growth! Now forgotten...
WTF!