Whose are whose men?
-
I read some of you talking about LHL's men and GCT's men and the latter's men replaced by the former's men.
So who are under GCT and who are under LHL?
-
GCT can see dun like LBH...now new PM LBH lick his boots and toes..so many in the house used to comfy work with GCT now need to reform get new ppl can lick new leaders' toes...like that lor....who retired u know lor they are whose men lor...that's how the gossip rumors and story goes lor
and NLL (pappy) and GHSM (wayang pan ty) both my gfs lor
-
No need to think so much.Originally posted by Icemoon:I read some of you talking about LHL's men and GCT's men and the latter's men replaced by the former's men.
So who are under GCT and who are under LHL?
When LHL become PM, GCT's men already sidelined.
Now, must change master or pack bag liao bcos GCT will be FIXED very soon.
Actually, GCT already kena FIXED liao.
All along in the elections, his speeches like out of step with the party one.
GE 2006 to be is PAP's worst organised campaign.
Too many cooks spoil the broth.
We have LHL trying to project friendly image, LKY inducing people to sue and counter-sue and SM trying to offer "Swiss Standard of Living".
You just watch on, GCT days are numbered.
Maybe Khaw can help to send him overseas to a retirement village! -
Too many cooks indeed. The PM doesn't have free rein to run his own campaign but instead is weighed down with baggage from SM and MM. I always thought keeping too many ex-PMs around was a bad idea. Here we see that we actually have 3 PMs trying to run the show.Originally posted by ObviousMan:Too many cooks spoil the broth.
We have LHL trying to project friendly image, LKY inducing people to sue and counter-sue and SM trying to offer "Swiss Standard of Living".
You just watch on, GCT days are numbered.
Maybe Khaw can help to send him overseas to a retirement village!
Of course, GCT will be made the scapegoat. LHL must not be seen to be unfilial. Although the problems of this election was partly LKY's fault (and mainly WKS's blunder). GCT was retrospective enough to see the JG issue as a tatical misstep, and was right to call for the party to ignore it.
As to who is GCT's men and who is LHL's men, it is very simple. Just look at those MPs who retire (commit harakiri) for the post-65ers.