Look is even popular than her sister brand - Mama detergent, cos no freebieOriginally posted by king108:Is there a lot of people buying it?![]()
What is the cheapest price?
Or because this cannot be shown to friends and relative, hence it can be cheap then?
My apology to u and Aveme for the misunderstanding. What I concerned with isOriginally posted by sbst275:Usually those things I believe are mainly from PRC
If talking abt collecting used canned drink cans, I believe those are PRCs that walked out of their work and have their permits cancelledOriginally posted by will4:My apology to u and Aveme for the misunderstanding. What I concerned with is
some old men picking up drink can. Could be they be local or from other
countries?
I mean at such an age, they come all far from China to here to work?Originally posted by sbst275:If talking abt collecting used canned drink cans, I believe those are PRCs that walked out of their work and have their permits cancelled
Originally posted by sbst275:If talking abt collecting used canned drink cans, I believe those are PRCs that walked out of their work and have their permits cancelled
Hence, can we say that we can buy cheap thing when this is no for showing people.Originally posted by sbst275:Look is even popular than her sister brand - Mama detergent, cos no freebie... $9.50 minus the dishwasing liq, 1kg cost $1.16
Cheapest is UIC @ $7.95 but 5kg, no freebie, 1kg cost $1.59
But cheap lor, last time back in 1994, Look and UIC cost $11 for a 5kg bag
If they can afford to come here to look after their granchildren, should they be rich enough?Originally posted by king108:No necessary..they may have came here to take care of their grandchildren here.
Originally posted by casino_king:They tried that with the Ministry of Health and then when SARS struck, the Ministry could not provide any guidance or leadership, because they were reduced to skeletal staffing.
Who here is for [b]small government That is to say, gahman boh chap; you all organise and solve your own problem.[/b]
The problem we are discussing is to lower the cost of living for the really needy.This lowest 20% income bracket earn only $800 per month and no way this segment of the population can get a credit card,but this segment of the population are sure to need to buy a HDB flat (given that it is a need to get a roof over your head)Low income earners should not get a credit card in the first place. And you need not buy a HDB flat to get a roof over your head, you can rent a room like me and many Malaysians who are working in Singapore. You have a family? You can rent a small HDB flat.
How many times does something like SARS happen? Get in the reservists... what are the reservists for? Train them in disaster management and get them ready for when disaster strikes.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:They tried that with the Ministry of Health and then when SARS struck, the Ministry could not provide any guidance or leadership, because they were reduced to skeletal staffing.
That what you want?
When did i ever mentioned that Low income earners should get a credit card? That was mentioned by SBST275,not me,i am just refuting what he said.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:Low income earners should not get a credit card in the first place. And you need not buy a HDB flat to get a roof over your head, you can rent a room like me and many Malaysians who are working in Singapore. You have a family? You can rent a small HDB flat.
Disaster management should be handled by the police or the civil defence force not the army reservists,we should not disrupt reservists from their normal everyday life if there are other channels to solve the problems as the reservists had already make a heavy commitment to come back each year for a certain period to undergo their ICT.Originally posted by casino_king:How many times does something like SARS happen? Get in the reservists... what are the reservists for? Train them in disaster management and get them ready for when disaster strikes.
.I also know that you are a doctor so what you earn is definately not comparable,why use yourself to compare?I as a doctor can afford more, but yet I am willing to rent a room in a flat and live with two other strangers. Why can't low income earners do the same?
note that you are one person alone,what i am referring to is lowest 20% income bracket household,average of 4 person.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:I as a doctor can afford more, but yet I am willing to rent a room in a flat and live with two other strangers. Why can't low income earners do the same?
And you think we have spare capacity in the police force?Originally posted by Aveme:Disaster management should be handled by the police or the civil defence force not the army reservists,we should not disrupt reservists from their normal everyday life if there are other channels to solve the problems as the reservists had already make a heavy commitment to come back each year for a certain period to undergo their ICT.
And that lowest 20% is trying to purchase a flat instead of renting a room? I don't get the logic..Originally posted by Aveme:note that you are one person alone,what i am referring to is lowest 20% income bracket household,average of 4 person.
civil defence force? or at most Full time National Service men serving their compusory 2 years?Originally posted by oxford mushroom:And you think we have spare capacity in the police force?
They brought the flat b4 the financial crisis happened and were better off then but still had not finished their 20-30 year loans.Do not look at things as it is now,there are actions taken in the past which affected them,so you certainly cannot compare yourself and malaysians who come here as they were not burden with past actionsOriginally posted by oxford mushroom:And that lowest 20% is trying to purchase a flat instead of renting a room? I don't get the logic..
Not a viable option. You need trained staff to handle an emergency like SARS. Plucking inexperienced NS men will not work.Originally posted by Aveme:civil defence force? or at most Full time National Service men serving their compusory 2 years?
Those are resources that could be tapped into and it is already a pretty sizabl e amount,so with that we should not add further burden on our reservist NSmen who are already heavily burden
then what make you think reservist are trained?Originally posted by oxford mushroom:Not a viable option. You need trained staff to handle an emergency like SARS. Plucking inexperienced NS men will not work.
Life is not a bed of roses. People make wrong investment choices...they must make do with what they have now instead of expecting the government to cover their financial losses.Originally posted by Aveme:They brought the flat b4 the financial crisis happened and were better off then but still had not finished their 20-30 year loans.Do not look at things as it is now,there are actions taken in the past which affected them,so you certainly cannot compare yourself and malaysians who come here as they were not burden with past actions
Beside you rent a room under market rate from flat owners not from the HDB and you are not subjected to strict criteria in renting one from the HDB
Reservists have completed their training in NS, whilst full-time servicemen are undergoing training. Don't you see the difference?Originally posted by Aveme:then what make you think reservist are trained?
if you want to call upon reservist,they will too have to come back to some camp for intensive training?
Civil defense people are more trained towards a country's internal problem management.
NS full time service man would already still need to be confirmed in their army camp,so there is no lost in training them at the same time.
Why do we need to recall reservist who have jobs in the real world to go back?
Who is expecting the goverment to cover their financial lost?Originally posted by oxford mushroom:Life is not a bed of roses. People make wrong investment choices...they must make do with what they have now instead of expecting the government to cover their financial losses.
Renting a room in an HDB flat at market rate is still cheaper than buying a flat. If they are so poor, why should they buy a flat when it is more economical to rent? On top of that, if they should lose their jobs, it will be added hardship if they have a mortage to servuce.
I think u embody a large group of singaporeans who cant grasp the problems of the low wage earners and the disenfranchised.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:And that lowest 20% is trying to purchase a flat instead of renting a room? I don't get the logic..