Fact is that, the older one gets, the more resistant to change you are. Poorly worded it may be, what I wanted to suggest is that as Singaporeans as a whole are a stubborn and apathetic community and factoring in the resistance to change older people would put up, it would almost be a forgone conclusion that nothing will come out of trying to change them, but that is just my point of view.Originally posted by pearlie27:young man,
older folks are more suspicious of kind gestures simply because they are more experienced and not because of what you claimed - firmly rooted tradition or hard life. they probably had been conned or heard enough of con stories. aren't most scams started with some sweetener or nice act?
i really don't understand what you meant by "No helping the majority of them. Just have to wait till they die.
courtesy and well-mannered behavior speaks of a person's substance and family background.Originally posted by Daniel-Lim:Tests such as these have to be viewed in the context of how they were conducted.
As a Singaporean, i would say that generally we are courteous compared to many countries in Asia. But we are far from being courteous enough.
Courtesy is a form of generosity of spirit. Many people do not understand this. Like many things else, we have only a very shallow understanding of true courtesy.
For many Singaporeans, courtesy is just a facade, a thin veneer. We still get rude very quickly as a people. On the roads drivers are still aggressive, people still get impatient easily etc.
A very simple illustration.
I was in Vancouver recently, and I was surprised at how quiet the roads are. Not just that they have less traffic - which is the case, surely. But even in some of the congested popular areas, you find that the drivers there rarely use their car horns. This is patience, this is also true courtesy, good manners. Which is unfortunately not that common in Singapore.
i tend to agree that we are not a very courteous lot. this is probably due to our fast-pace lifestyle. we become impatient and intolerant and have no time for social grace.Originally posted by Daniel-Lim:Tests such as these have to be viewed in the context of how they were conducted.
As a Singaporean, i would say that generally we are courteous compared to many countries in Asia. But we are far from being courteous enough.
Courtesy is a form of generosity of spirit. Many people do not understand this. Like many things else, we have only a very shallow understanding of true courtesy.
For many Singaporeans, courtesy is just a facade, a thin veneer. We still get rude very quickly as a people. On the roads drivers are still aggressive, people still get impatient easily etc.
A very simple illustration.
I was in Vancouver recently, and I was surprised at how quiet the roads are. Not just that they have less traffic - which is the case, surely. But even in some of the congested popular areas, you find that the drivers there rarely use their car horns. This is patience, this is also true courtesy, good manners. Which is unfortunately not that common in Singapore.
i feel that most sporean forums that appeal to the general singaporean crowd have members that tend to lash out whenever they feel they are targeted.Originally posted by altolize:Fact is that, the older one gets, the more resistant to change you are. Poorly worded it may be, what I wanted to suggest is that as Singaporeans as a whole are a stubborn and apathetic community and factoring in the resistance to change older people would put up, it would almost be a forgone conclusion that nothing will come out of trying to change them, but that is just my point of view.
And yes, there are many well moderated forums with mature members around, why dont you just google (or yahoo) for 'forum code of conduct' and look for rules pertaining to flame or derogatory terms. Also, amongst other things, double, triple, quadruple, pentuple etc posting is also generally frowned upon - the edit button is there for a reason.
No point in bringing up war storiesOriginally posted by oxford mushroom:The Japanese are a very courteous people....no question about that. Wonder if they bowed to their victims before raping the women, murdering the babies and beheading civilians.
you are really damn jialat.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:The Japanese are a very courteous people....no question about that. Wonder if they bowed to their victims before raping the women, murdering the babies and beheading civilians.
vancouver, hmmmmm ...................Originally posted by Daniel-Lim:Tests such as these have to be viewed in the context of how they were conducted.
As a Singaporean, i would say that generally we are courteous compared to many countries in Asia. But we are far from being courteous enough.
Courtesy is a form of generosity of spirit. Many people do not understand this. Like many things else, we have only a very shallow understanding of true courtesy.
For many Singaporeans, courtesy is just a facade, a thin veneer. We still get rude very quickly as a people. On the roads drivers are still aggressive, people still get impatient easily etc.
A very simple illustration.
I was in Vancouver recently, and I was surprised at how quiet the roads are. Not just that they have less traffic - which is the case, surely. But even in some of the congested popular areas, you find that the drivers there rarely use their car horns. This is patience, this is also true courtesy, good manners. Which is unfortunately not that common in Singapore.
exactly ....Originally posted by LazerLordz:Graciousness and wealth are not related. Old Lee was wrong.![]()
Illustrates the point: people are courteous to only certain people..it's not really courtesy, just discriminationOriginally posted by dragg:you are really damn jialat.
we are talking about courtesy. not about war atrocities 60 yrs ago.
Not totally wrong...if there are three of you fighting over a bowl of porridge, the one who lets another go first will die of starvation. By natural selection, the selfish one will survive. Evolutionists also talk about the 'selfish gene' that allow our species to overtake other animals.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Graciousness and wealth are not related. Old Lee was wrong.![]()
I don't see how in hell, our society can be wealthy enough for social graces to materialize, when costs are escalating every year and the rich poor gap ever widening.Originally posted by Fatum:vancouver, hmmmmm ...................
*rubs chin ...... well ... perhaps you were lucky enough not to run into those asian punk gangs there ......
but yeah, you're right .... Old Lee once remarked that social graces will come after Singapore reaches a certain stage of economic development; that is to say, a wealthy society will naturally evolve into a gracious society .......
well ... I don't see that happening at all ......
you're right, .... I agree that life is inherently a darwainian process, when it comes to the crunch, I suppose everyone would switch on their most elemental instincts, however, in societies, wealth != graciousness and courtesies ....Originally posted by oxford mushroom:Not totally wrong...if there are three of you fighting over a bowl of porridge, the one who lets another go first will die of starvation. By natural selection, the selfish one will survive. Evolutionists also talk about the 'selfish gene' that allow our species to overtake other animals.
Courtesy is easy if you do not have to worry about your next meal. It's a tough message but it's true.
wealth doesn't always translate into graciousness and respect for other people, infact, if you ask me, wealth tend to push people to the opposite direction ....Originally posted by ShutterBug:I don't see how in hell, our society can be wealthy enough for social graces to materialize, when costs are escalating every year and the rich poor gap ever widening.