[b]Pay To Watch World Cup[/b]

• Lowclassman

  6 Jul 06, 11:51

  Is it true that sinkapore the only country where its people have to pay to watch worldcup?
• dragg

  6 Jul 06, 12:07

  pay-per-view is acceptable but starhub shouldnt have charged members with sports channel subscription. this is the negative aspect of MONOPOLY.
  
  
• Agenda

  7 Jul 06, 10:47

  Mis-leading adverts, you in fact have to pay $70 to watch all 64 matches instead of $25
• Lowclassman

  7 Jul 06, 11:16

  This is outrages!!!
  
  They are taking the advantage of being a GLC in playing monopoly. Our govt are tooooooo......profit orientated with no root in the human heart passion.
• shade343

  7 Jul 06, 12:07

  Originally posted by Lowclassman:

  This is outrages!!!
  
  They are taking the advantage of being a GLC in playing monopoly. Our govt are tooooooo......profit orientated with no rooted in the human heart passion.

  Starhub is a private company. Not a charity organisation. They have to protect the interest of their shareholders.
• Lowclassman

  7 Jul 06, 13:43

  Originally posted by shade343:

  Starhub is a private company. Not a charity organisation. They have to protect the interest of their shareholders.

  Likewise, Mediacock is also a pte co.
  
  Are you implying that it's also applies to all the public tranportation companies?
  
  So...who are the major share holders....some big a s s in singapore..... I hate to hear people or the sluts keep saying the companies have to answer to its share holders. These share holders are taking the advantage of being it is a GLC and protected by freaking sg govt. So...hypocrisy!!!!!!
  
  Don't talk like typical papies!!!!!
• RETARDED_MORON

  7 Jul 06, 13:47

  Originally posted by Lowclassman:
  [b]Is it true that sinkapore the only country where its people have to pay to watch worldcup? [/b]

  Sounds like it.