If the ruling party accept the challenge,of course TV would broadcast the debate.Originally posted by Purplehaze623:even if they challenge, the media and news group wouldn't dare to take this challenge to boardcast it.![]()
![]()
![]()
Staying together,PAP wards moving ahead first.The opp. wards move last.Right?Originally posted by NUS_Superst@r:Staying together. Moving aheah. Ya, right!![]()
![]()
![]()
Challenge PAP for a televised debate?Nah,i dont think those PAP leaders can take it.That time Lee Kuan Yew was questioned by a group of teens on the television around the election period about his political policy n i see him nearly got questioned until going to cry,how are Lee Kuan Yew,Goh Chok Tong n Lee Hsien Loong going to take it if they were going to be questioned by a group of matured Singaporeans?Originally posted by PRP:I think the oppostion should challenge PAP for a televised debate on whether the govt can use public fund unfairly (or favouring the ruling party). If the PAP dares not to take up the challenge,that would means it knows the estate upgrading policy is wrong but it still do it for some selfish reasons.
Hey, what happen to the opp. parties?Never take up my 'challenge'!Originally posted by PRP:I think the oppostion should challenge PAP for a televised debate on whether the govt can use public fund unfairly (or favouring the ruling party). If the PAP dares not to take up the challenge,that would means it knows the estate upgrading policy is wrong but it still do it for some selfish reasons.
would u be willing to take up the challenge on national tv if the opposition party supports u?Originally posted by PRP:If the govt honestly believe the policy is fair,then it should take up my suggestion.
hardly the hallmark of evolved politics and inclusive posturing.Originally posted by TooFree:Residents of PP and HG are not completely void of a chance for estate upgrading. The incumbent party mainly prioritised the timing of upgrading for citizens who voted for the them into office as a little gesture in return for their support and loyalty.
Honestly. All is fair.![]()
I have done my part but the opp. parties haven't done their part.Originally posted by xxthunder:this will be an eye opener for everyone.another first for history of singapore.
BUT WHEN?!. ...... STILL WAITING.
That is the real world we live in though, every other democracy also is practised like so, in that the ruling part will apportion more of the "goodies" to their supporters first.Originally posted by PRP:SM said he respected the choices of the opp. wards.What is his meaning of "respect"?The opp. wards are discriminated against on estate upgrading.
Why don't he & his colleagues say the opp. wards chose wrong candidates?Then the ppl can be 'politically educated'.
Because they are not PAP supporters mah.Originally posted by GHoST_18:opposition ward residents aint any different to any other pap supporters...
they contribute to the nation in many ways too...
but why are they not getting the same benefits...?![]()
![]()
![]()
The above argument shows that the election tactics & the MND's policy is certainly wrong.PAP,what have you to say?Originally posted by PRP:According to PAP's estate upgrading policy,the voters have to vote for a PAP candidate even if he is not the best candidate,insincere guy, dishonest or corrupt.Otherwise,their estates would be served last.
According to PAP, PAP supporters voted for PAP. Without their support, there wouldn't be a PAP govt.So they must be rewarded. Priority in estate upgrading is just a small gesture for their support!Originally posted by GHoST_18:opposition ward residents aint any different to any other pap supporters...
they contribute to the nation in many ways too...
but why are they not getting the same benefits...?![]()
![]()
![]()