hmmm.... nice declaration!Originally posted by caramon.:I find that it is important to reflect on our lives and be thankful for the blessings that we have. I am thankful that unlike me, who has foolishly wasted my vote on the opposition, 66 % Singaporeans has made the right choice in deciding to vote for the PAP.
No government in this world cares for its citizen like singapore by upgrading with lift on each floor and cover walk-way in case of thunderstorm unlike other countries who are wasting their time tackling unimportant issues like recession and rising unemployment.
Even in the event of economy down turn, I am thankful to the government for giving me the opportunity to do my duty as a citizen in bearing the brunt of the recession by cutting our wages to stay competitive while maintaining top CEO salary so as to attract top talents. No other country will do that and therefore I take pride in that.
There is no corruption, cronynism and nepotism in our government and for that I feel we have a real bargain here with a measly MP allowance of only $20,000 per month whereby forgoing their generous private sector pay to serve the nation.
I am thankful that even though I am paid like a third world second class worker, I can still have a first world lifestyle. I am thankful that even though we are a first world society in many aspects, our wages are still competitive with third world countries.
The media is also spontaneous with our government ideas and policy. It is difficult to find the same thoughts between the government and media in other part of the world and from that, I know we are in good hand and in the same direction.
I am just thankful that I have the opportunity to show my appreciation to the government in this forum. Therefore I sincerely hope the remaining 33% of the citizen will appreciate the beauty of our beloved government thinking, who is truly concerned for the people of Singapore.
World Class Election ResultOriginally posted by vito_corleone:and i'm proud that my countrymen love complaining but do nothing to change the situation they so readily grumble and rant about![]()
![]()
Originally posted by caramon.:I find that it is important to reflect on our lives and be thankful for the blessings that we have. I am thankful that unlike me, who has foolishly wasted my vote on the opposition, 66 % Singaporeans has made the right choice in deciding to vote for the PAP.
No government in this world cares for its citizen like singapore by upgrading with lift on each floor and cover walk-way in case of thunderstorm unlike other countries who are wasting their time tackling unimportant issues like recession and rising unemployment.
Even in the event of economy down turn, I am thankful to the government for giving me the opportunity to do my duty as a citizen in bearing the brunt of the recession by cutting our wages to stay competitive while maintaining top CEO salary so as to attract top talents. No other country will do that and therefore I take pride in that.
There is no corruption, cronynism and nepotism in our government and for that I feel we have a real bargain here with a measly MP allowance of only $20,000 per month whereby forgoing their generous private sector pay to serve the nation.
I am thankful that even though I am paid like a third world second class worker, I can still have a first world lifestyle. I am thankful that even though we are a first world society in many aspects, our wages are still competitive with third world countries.
The media is also spontaneous with our government ideas and policy. It is difficult to find the same thoughts between the government and media in other part of the world and from that, I know we are in good hand and in the same direction.
I am just thankful that I have the opportunity to show my appreciation to the government in this forum. Therefore I sincerely hope the remaining 33% of the citizen will appreciate the beauty of our beloved government thinking, who is truly concerned for the people of Singapore.
Originally posted by Atobe:singapore is not regarded by the rest of the world as "first world", anyway the classification of 1st,2nd and 3rd world no longer exists fyi its a cold war era grading system. countries are now known only as developed and developing countries. the only country in asia to be recognised as a "developed" country is japan. the rest are all considered "developing"
[b]World Class Election Result
Singapore Election 2006 saw only 52% voted out of the 2,158,439 eligble voters - from which 66% voters (or 740,776 ) out of the 1,122,388 (or 52%) eligible voters had given their vote to the Incumbent Party for an election victory.
The STRONG MANDATE of "66%" turned out to be 740,776 from a population of 4.42 Million (2005 census).
This is The Singapore Standard as a member of the First World.
With a Singapore Standard like this being accepted unquestioningly, do Singaporeans deserve a better future ?
![]()
![]()
[/b]
ACCORDING TO OUR GOV WE ARE THE FIRST WORLD COUNTRY!!!Originally posted by vito_corleone:singapore is not regarded by the rest of the world as "first world", anyway the classification of 1st,2nd and 3rd world no longer exists fyi its a cold war era grading system. countries are now known only as developed and developing countries. the only country in asia to be recognised as a "developed" country is japan. the rest are all considered "developing"![]()
![]()
agree... i wanna be "sgquitter" but dunno how and where to...Originally posted by Coquitlam:There's one solution for all this....MIGRATE!
tot we are considered "developed"?...Originally posted by vito_corleone:singapore is not regarded by the rest of the world as "first world", anyway the classification of 1st,2nd and 3rd world no longer exists fyi its a cold war era grading system. countries are now known only as developed and developing countries. the only country in asia to be recognised as a "developed" country is japan. the rest are all considered "developing"![]()
![]()
Originally posted by vito_corleone:Which source did you depend on for your opinion made so boldly ?
singapore is not regarded by the rest of the world as "first world", anyway the classification of 1st,2nd and 3rd world no longer exists fyi its a cold war era grading system. countries are now known only as developed and developing countries. the only country in asia to be recognised as a "developed" country is japan. the rest are all considered "developing"![]()
![]()
The subjective terms First World, Second World, and Third World were used to divide the nations of Earth into three broad categories. The three terms did not arise simultaneously.
After World War II, people began to speak of the NATO and Warsaw Pact countries as two major blocs, often using such terms as the "Western bloc" and the "Eastern bloc." The two "worlds" were not numbered. It was eventually pointed out that there were a great many countries that fit into neither category, and in the 1950s this latter group came to be called the Third World.
Eventually, nations within the Western European and United States' sphere of influence (e.g., the NATO countries) came to be called (unofficially) the First World. Besides North America (USA and Canada) and Western Europe, the First World also included other industrialized capitalist countries such as Japan and some of the former British colonies, particularly Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa.
There were a number of countries that did not fit comfortably into this neat definition of partition, including Switzerland, Sweden, and the Republic of Ireland, who chose to be neutral. Finland was under the Soviet Union's sphere of influence but was not communist, nor was it a member of the Warsaw Pact. Austria was under the United States' sphere of influence, but in 1955, when the country became a fully independent republic, it did so under the influence that it remain neutral. Turkey, which joined NATO in 1952, was not predominantly in Western Europe and was not industrialized. Spain did not join NATO until 1982, towards the end of the Cold War and after the death of the authoritarian dictator Francisco Franco.
In modern usage, after the end of the Cold War, the term First World has come to denote the 'developed' Industrialized-Capitalistic nations that in 2000 had a higher GDP per capita than $15,000, as stated by the World Bank. This would include the United States, Canada, Japan, the countries of the European Union (in 2000), Norway, Iceland, Switzerland, Singapore, Israel, Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan (The Republic of China), and South Korea. The World Bank also denotes these as "High Income Economies."[1]
In recent years, as many "developing" countries have industrialized, the term Fourth World has been coined to refer to countries that have "lagged behind" and still lack industrial infrastructure. However, these are completely subjective terms usually used by people from economically dominant nations.
Some nations have developed their own classification scheme consisting of the "Third World," and the "Two-Thirds World." This system is similar to the former in that it also reflects economic status or behaviour. In terms of material resources, the "Third World" takes just one third of the pie, while the "Two-Thirds World" unjustifiably takes two-thirds of the pie.
Third World is a term first coined in 1952 by French demographer Alfred Sauvy to distinguish nations that aligned themselves with neither the West nor with the Soviet Bloc during the Cold War.
Today, however, the term is frequently used to denote nations with a low UN Human Development Index (HDI), independent of their political status (meaning that the PRC, Russia and Brazil, all of which were very strongly aligned during the Cold War, are often termed third world). However, there is no objective definition of Third World or "Third World country" and the use of the term remains common. Some in academia see it as being out of date, colonialist, othering and inaccurate; its use has continued, however.
In general, Third World countries are not as industrialized or technologically advanced as OECD countries, and therefore in academia, the more politically correct term to use is "developing nation".
Terms such as Global South, less wealthy nations, developing countries, least developed countries and the Majority World have become more popular in circles where the term "third world" is regarded to have derogatory or out-of-date connotations. Development workers also call them the two-thirds world (because two-thirds of the world is underdeveloped) and The South. The term Third World is also disliked as it may imply the false notion that those countries are not a part of the global economic system. Some claim that the underdevelopment of Africa, Asia and South America during the Cold War was influenced, or even caused by the Cold War economic, political, and military maneuverings of the most powerful nations of the time. (See Emerging markets)
The term Fourth World (as least developed countries) is used by some writers to describe the poorest Third World countries, those which lack industrial infrastructure and the means to build it. More commonly, however, the term is used to describe indigenous peoples or other oppressed minority groups within First World countries.
Great!!!!!Originally posted by sgheartland:Since National Day is round the corner, it is time for everyone to express their gratitude to the govt.
I am really thankful that we have a govt that can hand its citizens Progress Packages, Singapore shares and upgrading plans before elections and only tell us about the increases after the elections so that we will not be worried.
I am also thankful that we have a govt that is so creative and resourceful in thinking up ways to balance the budget or even to have budget surpluses.
Finally, i am thankful that while other countries dont give a fcuk care about the budget but our govt is determined to balance it and we as citizens can do our part to help our govt.
uh huh, and one-street minded people like you living in your own little world refer only to wikipedia readily for your "credible info" eh. you sure are "smarter" than me.Originally posted by Atobe:[/color]
Is the Singapore economy developed to a level which allow us to compete with the likes of other industrialized countries classified as First World or Developed World ?
Or is the present Singapore economy an illusion that is dependent on the inputs from Foreign Talents in niche high tech sectors of the economy, and which local Singaporeans can hardly contribute due to non-existent knowledge and exposure.
only the commies canOriginally posted by dragg:if there is anything that can be considered a record it is definitely the number of walkovers in the elections.
nobody can beat us!!!