Yeah...these are laws of singapore...it can be interpreted in many ways....if you offended some big a s s ..the laws will interpret in his favor to save himself or to put someone into deeper s h i t !!!Originally posted by BillyBong:Unlawful assembly can be interpreted in many ways.
As an enforcer of the law, the police are expected to be able to apply both lenient and stringent connotations where applicable.
In packed areas, it makes absolutely no sense for police to question every group > 5. Not only does it make them look silly, it makes the law itself look stupid outright.
When a gang of 6 beat up a defenceless individual, obviously the public will expect the police to act, and act swiftly to deter other would-be aggressors. Failing to do so would mean our police are weak and lack the will to enforce the letter of the law in such circumstances.
After all, our police force are always preaching prevention rather than reaction.
This case highlights their hopelessness and failure to act as required.
yeah.. seems like we're just workhorses to the govt...Originally posted by Devil1976:Yeah right... That's why people are complaining Singaporeans are already losing their rights as citizens... We always hear Singaporeans should do now... Singaporeans should do that... But have the gahment really genuinely care and bother about what the people need and the people want...? Or just because they holds the 'mandate' in their hands then they can walk around half-blind to the things happening around them...?
Just because they don't have to squeeze themselves in the packed bus and MRT... Don't have to worry about tax (which would ultimately rounds back into their renumeration).... Don't have to worry about themselves being beaten up and assaulted in the public..
'Police' is now just another form of 'internal military force' controlled by the gahment.. PAID by US.... But is ALMOST of no service or value to us nowadays...
If you're not happy, what you gonna do...? Complain and sue them...?Come on... We know that often only RICH people can afford to pay for those documents to throw you in your face...
If you're just a beggar by the streets... People come and just beat you up, what you wanna do about it...?? SUE THEM...?? WELCOME to the STREETS and CITY of CHAOS & CORRUPTIONS man....
SOON your 'MANDATE' is gonna be building you a country that you can barely breathe and even the foreigners would CONSIDER TWICE before giving birth...
Enjoy the 'SUN' while it's still around okie...?
Investigating the assualt, might be.Originally posted by www:still investigating?
SAD but TRUE.... Just TWISTING of WORDS for the FAMED, RICH and POWERFUL... CORRUPTION DESIGNED and MANIFESTED in one of its murky EVILS.....Originally posted by Lowclassman:Yeah...these are laws of singapore...it can be interpreted in many ways....if you offended some big a s s ..the laws will interpret in his favor to save himself or to put someone into deeper s h i t !!!
Originally posted by Sagara:UNDERSTOOD. But sometimes it's just HARD to put on a FIGHT alone...?
yeah.. seems like we're just workhorses to the govt...
But do understand that [b]not all P.Os, be it regulars or conscripts, are sleeping on the job and getting paid for nothing. There are many officers who go the extra mile just to make your neighbourhood a better place to live in, in aspects you do not see...[/b]
That is highly possible.Originally posted by ShutterBug:Ok, lets say he gets killed on the spot.
Do they need their own special doctor to PROOF and VARIFY that he is REALLY dead before classify as Murder?
WT - F!!
Originally posted by BillyBong:'SPECIAL CASE' siah....
[b]Police explain actions taken in assault case
Aug 16, 2006
The Straits Times
POLICE empathise with the plight of Ms Liew Sok Kuan's brother ('Assault 'a civil case', so no police action'; ST, Augand would like to apologise for the unpleasant experience that he had with our officers who first attended to the case.
We would like to clarify that we have been in contact with Ms Liew and her brother since the case was first reported, and have been updating him on our investigations.
Police received a call from Dr Liew at 12.05am on April 15 reporting the assault and that the assailants had already left on motorcycles. Though he mentioned that an ambulance was not required, the nearest available officers were despatched immediately, followed by paramedics.
At the same time, all officers on the ground were alerted to look out for motorcycles bearing the two registration numbers that Dr Liew provided to our operator.
On arrival at about 12.25am, the police officers were informed by Dr Liew that two men from a group of six to eight had punched him - once in the face, and once in the stomach. He was observed to be bleeding from the nose.
Based on the initial information given, the case was classified as voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 of the Penal Code. However, such a case requires a magistrate's authorisation before the police can exercise full powers of investigation. Dr Liew was given a police medical-report form and a referral letter to lodge a complaint with the magistrate.
He was, however, advised to contact the investigation officer should his medical examination reveal any fracture or other serious injury as the case may then fall under a different classification.
Our officers also proceeded to conduct enquiries at the scene.
Later that same morning, Dr Liew visited a neighbourhood police centre and provided his medical report, which indicated a fracture. This development was communicated to the investigation officer, who then reclassified the case that very same day to voluntarily causing grievous hurt (under Section 325) which did not require the lodging of a magistrate's complaint.
Dr Liew was informed that the case had been reclassified. Ms Liew also called the investigation officer at about 9pm the same evening and the officer informed her that police were investigating.
The Head of Investigation also spoke and wrote to Ms Liew and her brother to assure them of police action a few days later, following written appeals she had sent.
We acknowledge that our responding officers at the scene should have treated the incident more seriously, based on the circumstances that led to the assault. Had this been done, it would have been unnecessary for Dr Liew to be advised that he needed to make an application to a magistrate.
Nevertheless, this lapse has not compromised the investigation. The leads provided by Dr Liew were followed up on. One of the motorcycle numbers was invalid and the nearest match was established to be unrelated to the case, while the owner of the other motorcycle was identified and assisted in the investigation.
An identification parade had also been arranged for Dr Liew. We will continue to keep him updated on the investigations.
Audrey Ang (Ms)
Assistant Director
(Media Relations)
Singapore Police Force
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASE GRAVER THAN WAY IT WAS TREATED
We acknowledge that our responding officers at the scene should have treated the incident more seriously, based on the circumstances that led to the assault on Dr Liew.
So the police are writing it off as misjudgement on the part of their officers, but insist action was taken at the scene; the only exception was that it was woefully inadequate.
Considering how govt agencies close ranks and protect themselves, i doubt that any disciplinary action will be taken against the pair of officers in question. [/b]
Better still... Make sure that you're somewhere between being fractured but not dead ok?Originally posted by fudgester:What did say earlier... I'm going to laugh my head off at whatever dumb excuse the spokesperson gives. And truly, I'm going to die of laughter soon.
Welcome to Singapore. If you do get confronted and assaulted by superior numbers, hope that your bones get broken. Otherwise, you must handle the criminals on your own.
Have a pleasant stay.![]()