Originally posted by oxford mushroom:
The levy is to meant to discourage all and sundry from hiring even more FTs. Without the levy, will Singaporeans pay their maids more? I doubt it. How many Singaporeans are willing to give their maids a day off?
How many of those tree-hugging environmentalists own hybrid cars then? Isn't it pure hypocrisy? Fact is, most Singaporeans are not interested enough in environmental issues to consider switching to hybrid cars, even with the tax incentive.
Bottomline is: majority of Singaporeans are more motivated by financial considerations than any human rights or environmental issues. If you want them to give their maids a day off, you've got to legislate. If you want them to drive hybrid cars, you have to drastically increase taxes on ordinary cars.
there are reasons why employers here are not willing to give their maids a day off, or rather they prefer their maids to get paid in lieu of, or take the off days at the end of the contract and leave early. They get paid instead of money taken away. maids are no FTs!!
we have agreement on your last two paragraphs, singaporean, like sgPAP, looks only at bottomline, money!! who are developing those hybrid cars? who ensure that emission limits are implemented? history tells us that we can't just leave it to the cars manufacturers or the oil companies, there must be legislations, by international bodies, by the governments, WTO/IMF meeting is one of the opportunities where many such and similar issues and concerns are brought up. These CSO activists do not travel all over the world demonstrate and vandalising as a norm, and accommodating them as a host is only an identification with their cause. There is really no need to put up fences barbed wire, deploy Gurkas, tanks .......