Originally posted by onceinabluemoon:Email the links to the pics to as many people as possible you know...
[b]BETTER?[/b][/b]
u know what? the new paper reporter Faith Teo was formerly a Catholic High teacher when i was in sec 1 or 2 before she moved to TNPOriginally posted by ShutterBug:False information of rally and march
Empower Singaporeans @ Speakers' Corner
17 Sep 06
The PAP controlled media is engaged in a campaign of false information on the ongoing Empower Singaporeans March & Rally.
The government-owned Straits Times falsely claimed in its report today that the standoff between the police and Dr Chee Soon Juan & the activists ended 'last night’. This is a blatant lie to mislead the readers while the standoff is still continued on at the Speakers’ Corner at Hong Lim park.
Similarly, the afternoon tabloid, The New Paper, for its part said, Dr Chee was flanked by fewer than 10 supporters. What the newspaper didn’t report was that despite police harassment, more than one hundred people showed up to support the event.
The police had turned people away at the entrance to the Speakers Corner, warned supporters to leave the Speakers Corner, took down their NRIC numbers, and even confiscated the fliers that the organiser was distributing.
The standoff was deliberately created when the police refused to allow Dr Chee and the activists to march towards the Parliament House, then to Suntec City, and ending up at the Istana, as previously planned.
Dr Chee and activists are still held up at Speakers' Corner and the standoff with the police will only come to an end on Tuesday, 19 Sept 2006, when PM Lee Hsien Loong makes his opening address to the WB-IMF meetings.
For further information on the standoff, please continue to visit this website.
you think they can't handle? they'll send in the riot police!Originally posted by ShutterBug:What will happen, if all of us - around say about 3,000 show up and just stand there?
They can handle those few CSJ supporters - can they handles 3,000 people?
lol...did they record CSJ's big balls (courage) to confront the PAPOriginally posted by onceinabluemoon:want to hear a good joke?
1. after the disgraceful Reuters pics the swat team with stun guns decided to stand about 30 meters around them... no this is not the joke...
At aroung 3 pm, I saw people looking towards a small building at speakers corner and some police standing near it.
I just got there and asked an ah soh "what?"
I mean, the rest of the protesters were at the street corner, not at the small building.
"CSJ went to toilet" she said.
Police following him was nothing much to shout about...
They brought their video cam to record Chee going to toilet...![]()
but whats the point in confronting them with such courageous but fruitless act? yes he might had drawn the attention of the foreign media and that certainly has great implications but most importantly had he won the hearts of singaporeans?Originally posted by ctstalin:lol...did they record CSJ's big balls (courage) to confront the PAP
or are they embarrased by their own small c0ck![]()
I feel that ultimately, it may not be him who will succeed in getting things to change, but rather world observers who may intervene one fine day...like IMF manages to make them bow down to allowing in those activists.Originally posted by foxtrout8:but whats the point in confronting them with such courageous but fruitless act? yes he might had drawn the attention of the foreign media and that certainly has great implications but most importantly had he won the hearts of singaporeans?
i think csj should learn from the other opposition parties. by not going for a demostration doesnt mean that they dun care, nor does it mean that they have smaller balls. at least, the calmer but nevertheless firm approach adopted by the other opposition parties are more convincing to singaporeans. how many seats had csj won compared to the other opposition parties?
i had learned in life that the loudest speaker of all may not be best, neither the loudest approach, the best solution.
my two cents.
This is one issue I can't say I agree. Much as international pressure may be effective, I'm not comfortable with too much foreign hands, in the end, it's still about ourselves.Originally posted by ShutterBug:I feel that ultimately, it may not be him who will succeed in getting things to change, but rather world observers who may intervene one fine day...like IMF manages to make them bow down to allowing in those activists.
One step at a time we shall go...
Thanks, please keep us informed...Originally posted by Kouyou:for the latest updates dr. Chee n his supporters are still at the junction of the speaker's corner. although its drizzling now they are taking shelter in the public phone booths there.
posted by using pda. so pls dun ask me how i watch them n post on forums.![]()
i agree.Originally posted by ShutterBug:like IMF manages to make them bow down to allowing in those activists.
One step at a time we shall go...
Originally posted by onceinabluemoon:perhaps u must know that imf and wb are not clean organisation themselves. neither are the activist.
World Bank and IMF did not bow down to anybody... they were honorable people that is all. When they agreed to let the activists participate; [b]the did not agree with deceit in mind.
Not like the PAP; so used to deceitful tactics... fake freedom of speech; fake freedom of press; fake freedom of expression; fake trade union; fake democracy...
[/b]