Mahathir To SG :~ You Are A Tiny Country!!
-
not all singaporeans should be held accountable for an uncalled remark from our so called expired 'leaders/mentor'...who should have been long gone and done away with. don't we just hate those parasites who shamelessly cling on to power and try to make themseleves felt unless sometime like a coup or war in some countries put them away for good...Originally posted by mhcampboy:But i personally like this...
-
yeah, as a singaporean, i agree singapore is a small little cute smiling country.
we singapore is clean and green, we can stroll outside in the middle of the night without having to worry for robbers, without having to worry for my hand to get cut off. We have investors investing here, if singapore sux, why u r investing here, why big countries is investing here. I rather have one nice delicious peanut than to have a big packet of rotten peanuts.
No, we cannot win them in fighting the maylaysia forces, we can defend
but not long perhaps 1 month, but by the time the USA start farting at them and they can fly long long away, in malaysian eyes, we sux like peanut oil, in USA eye , malaysian is like a pitiful fly starving for food and is getting ready to get killed.
Mahathir too peaceful? Nothing to do? O cmon learn some manners, malaysian must be regretting to vote for u as political member before, they didnt noe that u have such a poor bring up of ur family, no manners, and in chinese we call u mei feng du, how can a shiit like u do good to country, o man do a plastic surgery before coming to singapore and USA, good luck mahathir! -
u are very stupid as well!Originally posted by chillz88:so malaysians very smart????
-
Perhaps the chinese race in Southeast Asia should all unite together and claim their right to self-determination. This will definitely put all the non-chinese people in Southeast Asia in jeopardy. After-all, the Southeast Asian economy is mainly in chinese hands.
-
well we're geologically tiny
-
old oredi mar... maybe he forgot wat he said in the past..just as wat he's saying now.. he probably will forget he said it in a week or so..Originally posted by pearlie27:what he said sounded rather racist to me. doesn't he every now and then warn us not to play with such sensitive issues? why does he not walk his talk?
-
I believe theres an Asian military feasibility study in 1999 or 1998, in which concludes that SAF can overcome a MAF's invasion, and completely annihilate the MAF within 1 month if they used up all resources to invade Singapore. With the MAF in ruins, SAF can then take Malaysia.Originally posted by axle-ken:nah u r wrong. we can just finish off malaysia within 48 hrs.
up to u to believe a not. but we'll sure win.
However, if SAF leads the invasion to Malaysia and MAF used all resources to resist the invasion, Singapore will take nearly 1.5 month to take the entire Peninsular, and if MAF gets reinforced in West Malaysia, they may counter-attack into Singapore.
In entirely, the study states that unless SAF have support from armed military assistance, its highly unprobable that SAF can win both Peninsular and West when SAF leads the invasion. In fact, if SAF ever wanted to attack, it would probably stop when she reaches Johor, recruit, reinforce, then defend.
MAF takes the stand of defence. Definitely if she attacks Singapore, US will step in. The amount of western investment here is enough to justify an attack.
-------------
Take the scenario when MAF invades. SAF completely defended SG and paramount losses for MAF. SAF reinforce with aid from US, launches a campaign against Malaysia. SAF takes MY.
Next will be the reparation work. Which will most definitely bankrupt the economy of both state. I don't think the rulling government will even agree in theory to invade MY. Sort of an economic disaster, and will most definitely set SG back to the 1970s or even earlier, in terms of economic power and investor's confidence. -
On the contrary, if you review the diplomatic stanch of Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia, it is obvious that SG and ID have built on an antagonistic approach against MY during the Reformasi years, when SG and ID have more economic and bilateral collaborations than SG-MY or ID-MY.Originally posted by qpicanto:yeah! for sure Indonesia would come to their aid.
ID have a majority Javanese population (in fact, the past 5 presidents have been Javanese, 1 Bugis) - Javanese are different from Malays. Racial difference have also created trife between the ethnic groups, and Malays are just a minority in Indonesia.
In fact, most of the Malays in Singapore are called Malays because of generalisation. I have almost 10 friends who were titled "Malay" by words of mouth, but states "Javanese" in NRIC. -
So, we should provoke our neighbour into attacking us first if we ever dreamt of imperialism?Originally posted by Slivester:I believe theres an Asian military feasibility study in 1999 or 1998, in which concludes that SAF can overcome a MAF's invasion, and completely annihilate the MAF within 1 month if they used up all resources to invade Singapore. With the MAF in ruins, SAF can then take Malaysia....... -
no money, use debt to wage war isit? asian financial crisis.. and you see them crash to the floor begging for assistance...Originally posted by qpicanto:
reality check. Indonesia transparent one izzit??
come war.. you think their bullet grow on banana trees har? -
the best way to provoke them.... wave the singapore dollar at them enough liow...Originally posted by abao:So, we should provoke our neighbour into attacking us first if we ever dreamt of imperialism? -
Originally posted by Slivester:
east and west malaysia is hundreds of kilometers apart..... do you expect their soldiers to swim across open sea?
I believe theres an Asian military feasibility study in 1999 or 1998, in which concludes that SAF can overcome a MAF's invasion, and completely annihilate the MAF within 1 month [b]if they used up all resources to invade Singapore. With the MAF in ruins, SAF can then take Malaysia.
However, if SAF leads the invasion to Malaysia and MAF used all resources to resist the invasion, Singapore will take nearly 1.5 month to take the entire Peninsular, and if MAF gets reinforced in West Malaysia, they may counter-attack into Singapore.
In entirely, the study states that unless SAF have support from armed military assistance, its highly unprobable that SAF can win both Peninsular and West when SAF leads the invasion. In fact, if SAF ever wanted to attack, it would probably stop when she reaches Johor, recruit, reinforce, then defend.
MAF takes the stand of defence. Definitely if she attacks Singapore, US will step in. The amount of western investment here is enough to justify an attack.
-------------
Take the scenario when MAF invades. SAF completely defended SG and paramount losses for MAF. SAF reinforce with aid from US, launches a campaign against Malaysia. SAF takes MY.
Next will be the reparation work. Which will most definitely bankrupt the economy of both state. I don't think the rulling government will even agree in theory to invade MY. Sort of an economic disaster, and will most definitely set SG back to the 1970s or even earlier, in terms of economic power and investor's confidence.[/b]
and even if they leave east malaysia completely undefended (practically inviting indonesia occupation) and move every MAF soldier to johor(talk cock).. we still outnumber them 3 to 1. -
What are u guys talking abt
Sabah and sarawak is part of m'sia and before they dreamt of transporting their troops to eastern m'sia,they would be cracking their brains on bypass the stationed troops in sabah and sarawak -
i lagi dont understand what you talking.... why the need to bypass stationed troops in sabah and sarawak?Originally posted by 0lala:What are u guys talking abt
Sabah and sarawak is part of m'sia and before they dreamt of transporting their troops to eastern m'sia,they would be cracking their brains on bypass the stationed troops in sabah and sarawak
kalimantan is indonesian territory you know? -
How come you never say you pro what party?Originally posted by qpicanto:pls lah ! give me a break lah ! -
hmm..think we better shut our mouth..let them runt at each other.. anyway its MM Lee who started to act caring remember..so its not Mahathir's fault to ask him to mind his own business.. we should not care about wat happens to Malaysia. Its their bloody problem..like the coup in thailand..their problem too.. we as singaporeans should learn to not be a big kaypo.. I still love it here in Singapore..
-
At least they contribute to peace efforts in Lenanon.Originally posted by tripwire:no money, use debt to wage war isit? asian financial crisis.. and you see them crash to the floor begging for assistance...
come war.. you think their bullet grow on banana trees har? -
Originally posted by kecang_puteh:How come you never say you pro what party? Pro lower cost of living. Party??? opposition voice need to be bolstered though. 41 ys everyday eat chicken rice not sian meh??
-
Few weeks ago Khariry (Adbullah's son-in-law) said that Singapore Malays are marginalised and there is no reaction from our government.
Now LKY said that Malaysia's Chinese are marginalised and the reactions out there are very strong and they are demanding LKY's apologies.
Not saying that LKY was right on making such comments (but what he said is true lah) but don't you think that Khariry should apologise to Singapore over his remarks towards Singapore's Malays also?
Our government sometimes is too soft against their M'sian counterparts. -
that is irrelevant to the discussion at hand...Originally posted by qpicanto:At least they contribute to peace efforts in Lenanon.
and... for a start.. the isrealis dont even want them, since they dont even recognize the state of isreal.
it begs one to question.. why defend the peace of a nation you do not recognize? or are you simply there to show islamic solidarity, what kind of peace are you keeping when you take sides?
and for your information... UN peace keeping ops are paid by the UN, true the UN is broke.. but technically.. they are paid for by the UN and all the nations who contributed to the UN operations fund... including USA, Singapore, PRC and Isreal as well as EU plus every tiny nation on earth.
they just contribute manpower and equipment, which in their case.. because of their islamic background.. would be a walk in a park compare to other peacekeepers from non-islamic nations, especially those that might have been percieved as pro isreal or pro US factions.
now.. lets get back to topic. -
no... our govt is wise, not to be drag into khairy statement... that joker was merely trying to use singapore to deflect the heat he is getting from malaysian chinese...Originally posted by toll123:Few weeks ago Khariry (Adbullah's son-in-law) said that Singapore Malays are marginalised and there is no reaction from our government.
Now LKY said that Malaysia's Chinese are marginalised and the reactions out there are very strong and they are demanding LKY's apologies.
Not saying that LKY was right on making such comments (but what he said is true lah) but don't you think that Khariry should apologise to Singapore over his remarks towards Singapore's Malays also?
Our government sometimes is too soft against their M'sian counterparts.
to respond to this baiting.. would be playing right into his hand... we should just keep quiet and let the malaysian chinese barbecue him alive.
but with LKY's statement.. i am sure the entire malaysian official machinery is gonna grab the opportunity to slam us...
its nothing new... and it aint gonna be the last... let them shout all they want... we just go on with our lives..
they cant invade us anyway... not happy, ask them go and fly kite, or bang their head into the wall lah.... -
if mahatir thinks LKY is lying... SUE LKY lah... or they dont dare to face the facts?Originally posted by fiqo:hmm..think we better shut our mouth..let them runt at each other.. anyway its MM Lee who started to act caring remember..so its not Mahathir's fault to ask him to mind his own business.. we should not care about wat happens to Malaysia. Its their bloody problem..like the coup in thailand..their problem too.. we as singaporeans should learn to not be a big kaypo.. I still love it here in Singapore..
we dont live in a bubble... wat happens in our neighbourhood affects us... what is wrong with LKY making his opinion heard?
didnt malaysia complain about other countries? why the double standard?
mahatir can go and shoot himself if he dont like it.. ... as if anybody gives a damn about how he feels.
since when did mahatir or UMNO even cared about how malaysian chinese or even less endowed malays felt about the opulence and extravaganze of his and present govt? -
Originally posted by Slivester:
are u a kid? hhaha
I believe theres an Asian military feasibility study in 1999 or 1998, in which concludes that SAF can overcome a MAF's invasion, and completely annihilate the MAF within 1 month [b]if they used up all resources to invade Singapore. With the MAF in ruins, SAF can then take Malaysia.
However, if SAF leads the invasion to Malaysia and MAF used all resources to resist the invasion, Singapore will take nearly 1.5 month to take the entire Peninsular, and if MAF gets reinforced in West Malaysia, they may counter-attack into Singapore.
In entirely, the study states that unless SAF have support from armed military assistance, its highly unprobable that SAF can win both Peninsular and West when SAF leads the invasion. In fact, if SAF ever wanted to attack, it would probably stop when she reaches Johor, recruit, reinforce, then defend.
MAF takes the stand of defence. Definitely if she attacks Singapore, US will step in. The amount of western investment here is enough to justify an attack.
-------------
Take the scenario when MAF invades. SAF completely defended SG and paramount losses for MAF. SAF reinforce with aid from US, launches a campaign against Malaysia. SAF takes MY.
Next will be the reparation work. Which will most definitely bankrupt the economy of both state. I don't think the rulling government will even agree in theory to invade MY. Sort of an economic disaster, and will most definitely set SG back to the 1970s or even earlier, in terms of economic power and investor's confidence.[/b]
soooo naive!
if dunno, dun talk lar..embarass urself only -
geesh.. since when did this thread end up with saf or maf 'invading' one another..??
-
this is a TOPIC about mahathir.......SG and our tiny country.........not SOME stupid wetmarket comparisons of BIG tiger prawns and small peanut fishes.........get that straight in your headOriginally posted by qpicanto:In KL many can afford 2-3 cars and stay in big houses. Even our actress go there to buy apartments. Cost of living is lower.