Magazine says Singapore ban curbs free expression
-
Singapore's ban on the Far Eastern Economic Review further restricts "the already narrow scope" of free expression in the city-state, the magazine says.
The ban "shows that the government has refused to reconsider its repressive approach toward the media," the Hong Kong Kong-based monthly, known by its initials FEER, said on its website.
Singapore on Thursday revoked its approval for sale or distribution of the magazine because the publication had failed to abide by an earlier deadline to comply with certain requirements of the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act.
It can still be accessed over the Internet despite the ban.
"We regret that this action infringes on the fundamental rights of our Singaporean subscribers and further restricts the already narrow scope of free expression in Singapore," the magazine said, promising a more complete response in its October 6 edition.
A government spokeswoman said Friday that the ban will remain in place until FEER re-applies to circulate and complies with the city-state's regulations on foreign publications.
"Once it's revoked, it's revoked," Bhavani Krishnasamy, press secretary to the minister of information, communications and the arts, told AFP.
"I guess they will have to decide if they want to come back," she said.
The government said it was now also an offense to import or possess copies of the magazine for sale or distribution in the city-state, which free speech advocates and press freedom groups have criticized for curbs on the media.
On August 3 the ministry announced that, effective September 11, the Review would have to appoint a person "within Singapore authorized to accept service of any notice or legal process on behalf of the publisher."
It was also required to submit a security deposit of 200,000 Singapore dollars (125,000 US).
The ministry said "an anomaly" meant that the magazine had not been subjected to the provisions earlier, adding that it was a privilege and not a right for foreign newspapers to circulate.
"They do so as foreign observers of the local scene and should not interfere in the domestic politics of Singapore," the ministry said.
For that reason they must comply with the Newspaper Act, it said.
A changing media landscape meant other "offshore newspapers" -- Newsweek, Time, the Financial Times, and the International Herald Tribune -- would also no longer be exempted from the two requirements, the ministry said.
London-based Financial Times has already complied, Krishnasamy said.
FEER, a Dow Jones publication, was made subject to the two provisions after it ran an interview with local pro-democracy activist Chee Soon Juan, who is secretary-general of the opposition Singapore Democratic Party.
The article described Chee's battle against the ruling People's Action Party and its leaders. It also touched on Singapore officials' success in libel suits against critics.
Two weeks ago, Singapore court officials and the magazine's editor revealed that Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his father, Singapore's first prime minister Lee Kuan Yew, had filed defamation suits against FEER editor Hugo Restall and Hong Kong-based Review Publishing over the Chee article.
Singaporean leaders have won hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages as a result of defamation suits against critics and foreign publications, which they say are necessary to protect their reputations from unfounded attacks.
International rights groups argue the use of lawsuits is intended to suppress freedom of expression and silence opposition parties.
Earlier this month, World Bank president Paul Wolfowitz said Singapore caused "enormous damage" to its own reputation by its reluctance to admit 27 activists whom the Bank and International Monetary Fund had accredited to participate at their meetings in Singapore.
Krishnasamy said she did not think the banning of FEER would have implications for Singapore's image abroad.
"These are just conditions, administrative procedures that were required under the act here," she said
-
Its ok, we can still go online and read their articles.
-
so....will they be sued?
-
Since our gov so rich, they should buy the whole planet Earth, so that the world of people, can be stopped from talking about them.
-
They destroying their own reputation at their own perils.
-
that's why I said, they don't need anyone to defame them... they doing it themselves....Originally posted by NUS_Superst@r:They destroying their own reputation at their own perils. -
How nice, curbing freedom of experession by censoring articles that say they are curbing freedom of expression
-
If anybody dare to criticise or talk about the PAP government, be prepared to get whack terribly hard man.
Examples:
To kill an ant, the PAP government will use a pile driver.
Instead of using a knife to cut the meat into small pieces, the PAP government will use HMX (High melting point explosive, one the more powerful high explosives used by militaries around the world today), to blow up into pieces.
Or vice versa.
The next time when you want to criticise/talk about 'THEM', be very prepared as 'THEY' have 'SOMETHING EXTREMELY BIG' in stall for you. -
indeed.. demonstrating our fave hobby to the whole worldOriginally posted by laurence82:How nice, curbing freedom of experession by censoring articles that say they are curbing freedom of expression -
Bhavani Krishnasamy is an idiot living somewhere detached from reality. (e.g. had no clue that mr brown's real name is known to most people in Singapore)