source?Originally posted by anonymouscoward:Just received the annual cost of living report for 2006.
Singapore is ranked number 17th out of 100. Up from 34th in 2005. I did a comparison and Singapore register the highest COL (cost of living) index increase; 14 points from 88 to 92.
It is not high compared to Seoul, Tokyo or Beijing but none of them increase by more than 10.
http://www.mercerhr.com/summary.jhtml?idContent=1124760Originally posted by anonymouscoward:http://www.mercerhr.com/summary.jhtml?idContent=1124760
Goes to show something, eh?Originally posted by anonymouscoward:Just received the annual cost of living report for 2006.
Singapore is ranked number 17th out of 100. Up from 34th in 2005. I did a comparison and Singapore register the highest COL (cost of living) index increase; 14 points from 88 to 92.
It is not high compared to Seoul, Tokyo or Beijing but none of them increase by more than 10.
But you mus understand the reason for that rapid increase:Originally posted by anonymouscoward:Just received the annual cost of living report for 2006.
Singapore is ranked number 17th out of 100. Up from 34th in 2005. I did a comparison and Singapore register the highest COL (cost of living) index increase; 14 points from 88 to 92.
It is not high compared to Seoul, Tokyo or Beijing but none of them increase by more than 10.
Originally posted by anonymouscoward:2005 GDP rank 31, so 2006 also should jump to top 20 postion, which mean our salary should increase rite?
[b]Singapore is ranked number 17th out of 100. Up from 34th in 2005. I did a comparison and Singapore register the highest COL (cost of living) index increase; 14 points from 88 to 92.
b]
Oh no! Please do not say that or they will use it to justify another round of salary increment for the ministers and MPsOriginally posted by T.Ryousuke:2005 GDP rank 31, so 2006 also should jump to top 20 postion, which mean our salary should increase rite?
I agree with your views. It is debatable whether the spending habits of expats can be used as a gauge; but the fact remains that they are doing an apple-to-apple comparison (i.e. how much a lipstick cost in 2005 and then in 2006 in Singapore). There should not be too much variation in the lifestyle but it does register a big jump in cost.Originally posted by ObiterDicta:So, my point is this: If you are trying to show that things have gotten worse for Singaporeans, please look deeper into the data. I may not disagree with you about cost-of-living issues, but the data you have cited does not necessarily support your claims.
88+14=92??Originally posted by anonymouscoward:Just received the annual cost of living report for 2006.
Singapore is ranked number 17th out of 100. Up from 34th in 2005. I did a comparison and Singapore register the highest COL (cost of living) index increase; 14 points from 88 to 92.
It is not high compared to Seoul, Tokyo or Beijing but none of them increase by more than 10.
Sorry, typo error. It is 4 points. Not 14.Originally posted by wisefool83:88+14=92??