Are you quoting James Gomez? LOLOriginally posted by JackOT:I think it's time to move on. This kind of news will just go on and on.
Let's face it, our gahmen sux.
Haha...noo...i didn't realise that.Originally posted by Hellraiza:Are you quoting James Gomez? LOL




ErrrrOriginally posted by RvnRooRon84:RJ Elitist so what?
In the end get enlisted still go botak-head and become lowest life-form on earth for awhile...hahaha![]()
Ho ei! Ho liao sia!Originally posted by Texcoco II:

Originally posted by Texcoco II:
yeah I found this rather bitter tooOriginally posted by Ito_^:![]()
![]()
C'mon, let's face it. Raffles is a robber that (I use the word "that" delibrately) comes to Singapore, robs all the island's wealth then runs away. (I know the following statement very cei up) Serve him right to die penniless.Originally posted by Gackt247:Phew.. lucky i have no history n affiliation to Raffles in anyway. Have not even visited any Raffles Medical Group clinics.![]()
(d) to raise discontent or disaffection amongst the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore;and this part pisses me off.
(e) to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Singapore.
Originally posted by Texcoco II:So after we counsel a lawyer and he say can press charge, the citizens of Singapore can press charge to Sr Wee and Wee Shu min lah?
Did Ms Wee just violated the Sedition Act?
Sedition Act (Singapore)
The Sedition Act is in Chapter 290 of the Statues of Singapore. It was last revised in 1985.
In September 2005, the Sedition Act was first used on individuals when three men, including a teenager, were charged for making seditious and inflammatory racist comments on the Internet.
Seditious tendency.
3. —(1) A seditious tendency is a tendency —
(a) to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the Government;
(b) to excite the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore to attempt to procure in Singapore, the alteration, otherwise than by lawful means, of any matter as by law established;
(c) to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the administration of justice in Singapore;
(d) to raise discontent or disaffection amongst the citizens of Singapore or the residents in Singapore;
(e) to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Singapore.
No lawyer would dare to take up this case.Originally posted by Hogzilla:So after we counsel a lawyer and he say can press charge, the citizens of Singapore can press charge to Sr Wee and Wee Shu min lah?
Originally posted by kaister:No lawyer would dare to take up this case.
I think in the movie Farquhar was suggesting they build a lot of things to be named after Raffles.....including a mental institutionOriginally posted by the Bear:it was a short skit in the beginning about Sir Stamford Raffles trying to institutionalise some people.. the place would be named after him for founding it.. Raffles Institution!
Well, there is one recently kenna thrown in the Hougang chalet.Originally posted by kaister:No lawyer would dare to take up this case.
He won't and I would rather he put in all his efforts in running Potong Pasir. There're more important things than to bring down an elitist 18-year-old gal and her MP father.Originally posted by Hogzilla:Do you think Chiam See Tiong dares to take this case? He is a lawyer.
nobody call them keep their mouth shut...Originally posted by nanren4ever:When people never list their thoughts and opinions, people say its because they scared to talk.
When people open their mouths and talk about their personal thoughts, people say they should keep it shut.
Hard 2 be a human being at this age.