but metrosexual goes by mordern guys being vain and dabbling in cosmetic which were never once though to be used by the guys.Originally posted by NT2:i cant really stand metrosexual guys...i tend to classify them as amateur gays![]()
i'm not going to mix metro with SNAG this time so i'm just drawing that line between SNAG and metro.Originally posted by anonymouscoward:metrosexual or SNAG (Sensitive new age guy)?
SNAG are those that will carry their girlfriend's or wife's handbag. In Singapore context, they are unusually weak, henpeck and is just a thin line away from being gay.
Metrosexual are those who men who go for facial treatments, spa (the clean type) etc. They wear fancy clothes, are particular about how they carry themselves and is sensitive to a woman's need.
I thought the should was good. I would rate the plot 7/10; nice twist and a good and unusual ending.Originally posted by Ito_^:sissfied guys.![]()
I TELL U TO STOP THIS FARK WILL YOU! BASTARD KDI!Originally posted by sgboy2004:so are they clones?
u r the one who is thinking too much, kid... mi is referring to the topic..is metrosexual a clone of the gay? U are incorrigible and lack the breadth that writers have... go repent... haiz...Originally posted by Dongseng:I TELL U TO STOP THIS FARK WILL YOU! BASTARD KDI!
I define gays and those with a homosexual preference. So no, I don't think SNAG or metrosexuals are gays. But SNAG does put me off a fair bit. I can't stand them and neither could all my girlfriends.Originally posted by Dongseng:i'm not going to mix metro with SNAG this time so i'm just drawing that line between SNAG and metro.
Just to side track,do u consider both the above as gay?
They might look close to gays but since the line hasn't been overstepped,then it dosen't seem appropiate for the society to labell them as gay right?
I'll GET THE MOD TO DEL UR IDIOTICTYOriginally posted by sgboy2004:u r the one who is thinking too much, kid... mi is referring to the topic..is metrosexual a clone of the gay? U are incorrigible and lack the breadth that writers have... go repent... haiz...
Guess u will never make it big afterall ...
lalalalalalalalalalaOriginally posted by Dongseng:I'll GET THE MOD TO DEL UR IDIOTICTY
AND ITS NOT FUNNY.
IF U WANNA LOOK SO MUCH INTO THE WORDS,STARE AT THE WALL
turn in to your graveOriginally posted by sgboy2004:lalalalalalalalalala
go fly kite, kid
if metro have be interagted into the society then why are metro being associated with gays?Originally posted by PointBlue:I think metrosexuals, no matter the label, are still a unique by-product of modernization and we, as a modern society, regard them as a integral part of society already.
However, it still doesn't change the traditional mindsets that some people may take against them.
That's where you are sorely wrong.Originally posted by Dongseng:if metro have be interagted into the society then why are metro being associated with gays?
after all theres the thin line which seperate what is and what's not.
of course i know what gay is and metro isOriginally posted by PointBlue:That's where you are sorely wrong.
Gays = homosexuals
Metrosexuals != homosexuals
Only the uninformed would associate them with each other. The thin line theory plainly sucks because the distinction between the two is clear if one knows the definitions for each category.
You should know why. You came up with it in your opening post.Originally posted by Dongseng:of course i know what gay is and metro is
i already said theres a thin line.
what i asked above was why are both of these two term being mingled associated.
I SAID ITS NOT FUNNY KIDOriginally posted by sgboy2004:Ah pointblue, are metrosexuals clones of gays? Is there anything foul abt this question?
*note, question directed at PointBlue only*