GST to be raised to 7%
-
raedy to post but lazy to search? What a clear loser!Originally posted by soul_rage:I am too lazy to keep going back and take out your words for you.
Can you pls comment on the above?
Clinton (ex-politician) -> earn millions with his talks EQUALS US politicians much much richer than our ministers? -
Yes indeed, shorter hours do equate to less demanding. Thats objective. Unless of clourse you can show that the shorter hours equate more stress.Originally posted by soul_rage:shorter hours = less demanding
Therefore with that you declare our schools is less stressed?
Come on, behave like a man, don't hide like a cowardly dog and require people to chase you out of your hiding place -
reeaalllyyy???? why do i hear more and more ppl saying 5 day work wk have to do more than 5.5days of work last time?Originally posted by Mat Toro:Yes indeed, shorter hours do equate to less demanding. Thats objective. Unless of clourse you can show that the shorter hours equate more stress.
-
did you do a survey? Where are the stats please.Originally posted by duotiga83:reeaalllyyy???? why do i hear more and more ppl saying 5 day work wk have to do more than 5.5days of work last time?
did these people say they prefer 5.5 days back? -
nw you are asking for stats.....unfortunately i dont have, but is thru ppl whom i talk to during army and govt sectors ppl whom i met during my working in army & subordinate courts & friendsOriginally posted by Mat Toro:did you do a survey? Where are the stats please.
did these people say they prefer 5.5 days back? -
so do these people prefer 5 days or 5.5 days?Originally posted by duotiga83:nw you are asking for stats.....unfortunately i dont have, but is thru ppl whom i talk to during army and govt sectors ppl whom i met during my working in army & subordinate courts & friends -
the complainedOriginally posted by Mat Toro:so do these people prefer 5 days or 5.5 days?
more workload to cover in 5 days to cover the workloads of 5.5 days. In short more work to do to cover the same amount in a shorter time. -
So do they prefer 5 days or 5.5 days?Originally posted by duotiga83:the complained more workload to cover in 5 days to cover the workloads of 5.5 days. In short more work to do to cover the same amount in a shorter time. -
There are rich people becoming hawkers n it is being reported in the local paper.Originally posted by Mat Toro:You mean to say its the rich who run hawkers stores? Where is your proof? -
U want Mr Duotiga to migrate?Originally posted by Mat Toro:no body is controlling you, your just a softie thats all. -
What I got told there were 150000 local living in other countries either working or studying. It seemed they prefer other countries to Spore.Originally posted by Mat Toro:some leave because they think Singapore is too stressed. That one no choice cos that is the only way we can survive. If they can't handle the competition, they can go.
I won't worry if i am the PM. -
there are millions of americans studying and working overseas too. What do you think? They hate america? maybe they do. my american frens do indeed prefer singapore to USA. -
Million of Americans studying as short study trip? Amrican have more sense of patriotism as demonstrated during the postaftermath of 911 attacks.Originally posted by Mat Toro:there are millions of americans studying and working overseas too. What do you think? They hate america? maybe they do. my american frens do indeed prefer singapore to USA.
U claimed million as in how many for the exact figures? The last time I knew many American left becasue they see the Vietnam War as the reason cause if not wrong NS is compulsory in US. How many American frens u have claimimg they like here compared to their countries? Do they still keep their US citizenship or become local citizen already? -
I think the NS is becoming softer good for my local frens.
-
I am confused by ur statement, u claimed local who migrate to other countries softies n cannot handle competition. U came back by saying these localsOriginally posted by Mat Toro:Why not? if they can help us make money.
should come back if they can help Spore earn money. Where is ur stand? -
do these singaporeans keep their Singapore citizenship then?Originally posted by will4:Million of Americans studying as short study trip? Amrican have more sense of patriotism as demonstrated during the postaftermath of 911 attacks.
U claimed million as in how many for the exact figures? The last time I knew many American left becasue they see the Vietnam War as the reason cause if not wrong NS is compulsory in US. How many American frens u have claimimg they like here compared to their countries? Do they still keep their US citizenship or become local citizen already? -
Actually Singapore like I said is a great country, the government is ok too. But they need to start listening more to the people and actually take their views and concerns into consideration.Originally posted by Mat Toro:there are millions of americans studying and working overseas too. What do you think? They hate america? maybe they do. my american frens do indeed prefer singapore to USA.
Other than that, like I said, Singapore is a great country. I do not oppose blindly like what some people might think. -
Yes n No cause some keep they wanted to make sure they can adapt to their adopted countries in case they cannot make it, they can go back anytime theyOriginally posted by Mat Toro:do these singaporeans keep their Singapore citizenship then?
want.
No because they want to enjoy the benefits as those citizen in their adopted countries. If not wrong, in here, u need to be a PR for a period of time before u can apply for local citizenship. Australia n US also need their PR to have a waiting period before they can be permitted to become citizen. -
It is a great country but they have a lot to learn from South Korea.Originally posted by bigmouthjoe:Actually Singapore like I said is a great country, the government is ok too. But they need to start listening more to the people and actually take their views and concerns into consideration.
Other than that, like I said, Singapore is a great country. I do not oppose blindly like what some people might think. -
How long have ur US frens stayed in here?Originally posted by Mat Toro:there are millions of americans studying and working overseas too. What do you think? They hate america? maybe they do. my american frens do indeed prefer singapore to USA. -
What do you want us to learn from korea? football? handphone?Originally posted by will4:It is a great country but they have a lot to learn from South Korea. -
varying lengths. a few years. one of them wants to stay here as long as possible.Originally posted by will4:How long have ur US frens stayed in here? -
i would like toOriginally posted by will4:U want Mr Duotiga to migrate? subtle hint frm mom saying hoping me to go coy have oversea assignment if possible.
but right nw i can't
-
hehe that's not objectiveOriginally posted by Mat Toro:Yes indeed, shorter hours do equate to less demanding. Thats objective. Unless of clourse you can show that the shorter hours equate more stress.
That's just your Asian mentality playing tricks on you. People who work many hours = very good people, I believe that's what you mean.
Nope I did not say shorter hours equate more stress. I merely just pointed out to you that shorter hours is not sufficient to equating it to less demanding. -
For every new page I will add on more interesting Mr Mat's rubbish
So here's what you, Mr Mat Toro CANNOT back up so far:
1) Claims NS is not tough, but has no guts to backup your claims
2) Claims Singapore schools are not stressful, because they have lesser school hours -> less demanding -> less stressful, which we all know that lesser hours DOES NOT equate to less demanding, and therefore your claim that our schools are less stressful CANNOT stand up to mathematics logical proving
3) Has no info to backup your claims that most research people are foreigners, and does not have the guts to even admit you made this claim
4) TO DATE, has no articles or fact to backup many of your claims. Those few claims that your provided his 'article' or 'fact' lacks quality in substantiation as the example in point (7) demonstrates
5) Declared hawkers are POOR people, and now does not have the guts to face up to your own claims
6) Declared that our Poor has TVs, refrigerators, air cons, flat screen TVs, with NO EVIDENCE whatsoever to backup your claims
7) Declared that US politicians are much much richer than our ministers with the below example (and this is so funny):
-> Clinton is earning millions with his talks
When in fact, the following are the cold hard truths to you:
-> You DO NOT KNOW how much Clinton truly earns
-> You think Clinton is a politician, when in fact, he is now an EX-POLITICIAN
8 ) Can't decide between people who leave = soft, or people who leave = smart and Singapore should bring back.