Originally posted by av98m:There's plenty of them further down the food chain too.![]()
siang?Originally posted by oxford mushroom:It is easy to force deadwood at the top out...If they do not perform, you can give them a poor report, reassign them to less responsible jobs, cut their bonuses (a large proportion of their pay is in the variable component).
i wish i could say thatOriginally posted by isosceles:Oops.. i just quit my job as a civil servant..![]()
Every officer has a reporting officer on top of him and everyone has objective KPI to fulfill each year. Any officer who fails to deliver will get a poor rating...the entire process is open to review by the administration.Originally posted by the Bear:yeah.. and who the heck is going to give them the report?
you?
Originally posted by oxford mushroom:Every officer has a reporting officer on top of him and everyone has objective KPI to fulfill each year. Any officer who fails to deliver will get a poor rating...the entire process is open to review by the administration.
how does he get a poor rating when he slogs the men under him to do the job?Originally posted by oxford mushroom:Every officer has a reporting officer on top of him and everyone has objective KPI to fulfill each year. Any officer who fails to deliver will get a poor rating...the entire process is open to review by the administration.
well, GST increase is to help the poor/needy, says little Goh.Originally posted by miserable:The good news for those in the civil service, what about those who are unemployed, the poor ?![]()
the cat is out of the sack....read ST 29 Nov 06 PG 4 "Ministerial pay lags behind benchmark"Originally posted by av98m:Or it could be simply another big smokescreen by the PAP to raise ministers' and mps' salaries, after they realised that with the current sentiment on the ground, they will get even more abuse if they didn't apply it to the whole civil service.![]()
