http://www.sgbetforum.com/showthread.php?t=134I have uploaded the above article to my website which compare visitors growth between Macau and Hong Kong.
The trend indicates that Macau will surpass Hong Kong in terms of tourist arrival this year. It is attributed to the attraction of the boom in casinos in Macau over Hong Kong's theme parks, notably Disneyland. In 2006, while Hong Kong saw a 7.5% rise in tourist arrival to the island, Macau register a 14.6% increase, and the gap is set to widen this year as in Jan 07, Hong Kong saw a contraction of -1%, while Macau has a strong 22.7% growth. Hong Kong's strategy of offering attractive theme parks doesn't seems to work as well as Macau's single draw on casino gambling.
How about Singapore? Due to political correctness, the government is doing everything to downplay the casino aspect of the two IRs, and limit the proportion of space that can be allocated to it. However it would mean that the commercial value of these two IRs are not fully maximised, and I am afraid that future projects may not draw as much interest as these two from the big players. By all means, the two IRs will be great in the first two years due to initial attraction from curiosity, but after that, it may be hard to produce any sterling result if the casino aspect of the business are not allowed to be fully capitalized on. If Hong Kong can become second best even with Disneyland themepark, I wonder how attractive can our two theme parks be, even with Universal Studio thrown in.
Sgbet