Do not understand the logic behind this
-
I still do not understand the logic as wat the anti-PAP crowds hav claim, if , as they claimed, tat the gov keep "eating" people's money such as through GST or etc...even though every year there is a already massive income surplus, why would the gov need so much money for?
Since SG is already doing well, economy is good, instead of plunging the money back to the people somehow why would it demand an ever increase income to the gov? -
I thought our health minister say before? Higher salaries equate to higher costs of living.
-
higher salaries--->higher disposable income--->more spending--->assuming supply constant---->inflation---->gov need tax to control dispoable income to solve inflation/ need more money for govt spending as real value of money falls...
-
They need to make contingency plan for their astronomical salaries.Originally posted by Texcoco II:I still do not understand the logic as wat the anti-PAP crowds hav claim, if , as they claimed, tat the gov keep "eating" people's money such as through GST or etc...even though every year there is a already massive income surplus, why would the gov need so much money for?
Since SG is already doing well, economy is good, instead of plunging the money back to the people somehow why would it demand an ever increase income to the gov? -
ok so the "massive" income surplus earned reported by SG government every year is not adequte, so hav to be substitute with a GST hikes huh? Then tat realli considers a "big" income surplus...If tat's the case, isst tat self-contradicting to the gov?Originally posted by logic101:higher salaries--->higher disposable income--->more spending--->assuming supply constant---->inflation---->gov need tax to control dispoable income to solve inflation/ need more money for govt spending as real value of money falls...
-
If I have one million, why stop?Originally posted by Texcoco II:ok so the "massive" income surplus earned reported by SG government every year is not adequte, so hav to be substitute with a GST hikes huh? Then tat realli considers a "big" income surplus...If tat's the case, isst tat self-contradicting to the gov?
Why not two million?
And if I don't have my two million, why should I work for the people?
Why? -
When the govt talks, you shaddup and listen.Originally posted by Texcoco II:ok so the "massive" income surplus earned reported by SG government every year is not adequte, so hav to be substitute with a GST hikes huh? Then tat realli considers a "big" income surplus...If tat's the case, isst tat self-contradicting to the gov? Even if you have grand plans that will make this a better place to live, share it with us, so we can make it our idea. -
Yeah and after a few tinkerings and modifications it'll read something like.....Originally posted by ditzy:When the govt talks, you shaddup and listen. Even if you have grand plans that will make this a better place to live, share it with us, so we can make it our idea.
"We'll give you $100 (initially)"
6 months later
"We're taking back $99"
hmmm sounds familiar... -
its true that the govt uses tax to control inflation...Originally posted by logic101:higher salaries--->higher disposable income--->more spending--->assuming supply constant---->inflation---->gov need tax to control dispoable income to solve inflation/ need more money for govt spending as real value of money falls...
however... the idea of the govt need more money to spend because real value of money falls... only occurs when the inflation is out of control... which is not the case in singapore.
there are many functions in taxation.. if you are really interested.. try reading on economics... after you got your foundation... pick up a book or two on international economics, public finance and banking. -
Haiz, that's really peanuts lah... there are >4.4 million people in case you haven't noticed; really work so hard noe n got not time to go fixing around, ok? So please be thankful the incorruptible system must never be compromised therefore don't quite understand too that mushroom mashes with the UK thingy, so mare away in pounds too. Don't wanna to fix n he wanna to pound, what the messy oxyfox. Wish he could just count pennies instead of pounding himselfOriginally posted by charlize:If I have one million, why stop?
Why not two million?
And if I don't have my two million, why should I work for the people?
Why? -
you wrong...it should be.... "We're taking back $1000"Originally posted by Wakus:Yeah and after a few tinkerings and modifications it'll read something like.....
"We'll give you $100 (initially)"
6 months later
"We're taking back $99"
hmmm sounds familiar... -
& they are wondering why the birth rates are low No $, no children
-
Tsk Tsk Tsk....Originally posted by Boy Stratus:& they are wondering why the birth rates are low No $, no children
Wrong again. They just want those with $$ to give birth to more children. Because the MM's thinking is that he only want those with good genes to procreate. You can make tonnes of $$, to them it means you have a good genes, so they only want these people to have children.
If you are have no $$, that means you have a lousy gene and you are a nobody; It means they dun need to have your children.
I like to play on PM's word. "Nobody will be left behind" -
They won't be left behind alright, they will be terminated.Originally posted by Hogzilla:Tsk Tsk Tsk....
Wrong again. They just want those with $$ to give birth to more children. Because the MM's thinking is that he only want those with good genes to procreate. You can make tonnes of $$, to them it means you have a good genes, so they only want these people to have children.
If you are have no $$, that means you have a lousy gene and you are a nobody; It means they dun need to have your children.
I like to play on PM's word. "Nobody will be left behind" -
Originally posted by Hogzilla:Tsk Tsk Tsk....
Wrong again. They just want those with $$ to give birth to more children. Because the MM's thinking is that he only want those with good genes to procreate. You can make tonnes of $$, to them it means you have a good genes, so they only want these people to have children.
If you are have no $$, that means you have a lousy gene and you are a nobody; It means they dun need to have your children.
I like to play on PM's word. "Nobody will be left behind" Hidden meaning -
maybe he meant in a indirect way, Only "Nobody" will be left behind ..Originally posted by maurizio13:They won't be left behind alright, they will be terminated.