Originally posted by oxford mushroom:
Btw, employers need not inform employees that if the new foreign worker can perform as well as they do, their jobs would be in jeopardy. That is common sense and is happening in every field. Indian radiologists can read plain X-rays as well as our doctors, so we outsource these X-rays to Bangalore. Our radiologists have to undertake higher value work in therapeutic radiology or be jobless. That's a fact of life. If that happens to the highly trained medical specialist, what makes the ITE graduate so special that he should be exempted from the realities of the global economy?
You do not sack people on a whim, especially since classification of whether an FT is 'better' than a local is subjective. And if you do, and by your arguments, then there are plenty of people in SG that deserve the sack. Yet they are still holding onto their jobs.
Why this strange phenomenon?
Did the radiologists get sacked after the hospital 'experts' decided bangalore specialists could read and diagnose X-rays better than locals? Or did they get a
job re-alignment and be re-assigned to other duties?
Surely such high-earners eating away company funds, doing less than satisfactory results compared to mainland Indians who are paid a fraction of their wages should be immediately shown the door?
Isn't it more likely some people are simply better than others in certain fields? Should we then sack all the locals and outsource FTs based on this warped assessment?
