my smelly foot.Originally posted by Cystaire:We are the luckiest people in the SEA region, probably the world.
We have a government that is legendary for its efficiency and foresight.
At the same time, Singapore's government is the luckiest in SEA, likely the world.
They manage a hardworking people who are obedient, have a can-do attitude, and don't ask too many questions.
If you read the history of other countries you will realize just how lucky we are. Look at it both ways.
If we have an oppressive government, then no matter how good the people are, there will be widespread suffering. The only real vote that anyone has is her or his feet. In Singapore, people migrate as professionals, often living rich and happy lives elsewhere.
In other regional countries, they migrate as despised boat people or illegal labour.
If we have a violent, uncooperative people, then no matter how good the government is, there will be widespread bloodshed. In other countries where there is deep ethnic and religious or civil strife, everything is much much much harder for any government to handle.
Always count your blessings.
Things can't be much better, but they can sure be much much much worse.![]()
Quicey,Originally posted by Quincey:Well, the govt has faced a whole lot of stinging criticism, which is no doubt healthy. However, what viable alternative or alternatives can critiques offer to this government? I guess what we need viable solutions if we want to offer criticisms. For example, the gap between the rich and the poor. Many are calling for the government to do more. As such, the government has decided to push GST up to 7 per cent to offset it's proposed social policies. Many lement that this measure would in effect render the middle and lower incomed segments of our population worst off. In opposition, many are calling for a whole array of alternative measures, some suggest that we should use our reserves to plug the gap; others reason that we should tax the rich and embrace western socialism; others say that we have to cut down our spending on other sectors. These are reasonable solutions, but are they viable in our nation-state? Plugging the gap with our reserves which is effectively property of the citizenry. Certainly it sounds convenient, but in the long run, how long can the reserve be used to plug the gap? Income gaps are here to stay, it's just a causal effect of our globalized world. Even the United States is facing a debate of such on it's own. Of course, most western nations have socialism to turn to, but can socialism work in Singapore? Given the investor reliant economy we are?
I believe the plug gap measure of re-distributing our annual surpluses is a start, even though meagre the sum, it shows the administrations' readiness to utilize that option when need be.
2.many xyz&%%4 PAP,LKY LHL in coffe shops and still appearOriginally posted by bigmouthjoe:Nothing we can do what. Say something wait kena jail or sue. But those stupid 66.6% very happy lah, so what to do.
Haha....Originally posted by maurizio13:I got other suggestions.
Maybe we should:
1) ban people living in high-rise from hanging laundry out, so that my clothes won't get wet by their wet dripping clothes.
2) ban cigarettes because the smoke is hazardous to others and smokers litter butts all over the place
3) ban on alcohol, so that people won't be driving under the influence of alcohol, the roads will be safer, not to mention taxi drivers won't have to clean up the puke
4) ban the sale of permanent markers and spray paints, because alot of vandals use it to vandalise public walls and lifts
5) ban the sale of condoms, because couples litter ther park after using them
6) ban on speeding by putting a speed regulator in cars, so that cars can only travel at 50km/h, because speeding kills
7) ban the sale of knifes, because some people would use it to commit robbery and murder
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
-
-
-
-
-
-
I think you get the idea.
Hehehe
Nobody is asking the govt to use reserve to plug the gap between the rich and poor. You are the one.Originally posted by Quincey:Well, the govt has faced a whole lot of stinging criticism, which is no doubt healthy. However, what viable alternative or alternatives can critiques offer to this government? I guess what we need viable solutions if we want to offer criticisms. For example, the gap between the rich and the poor. Many are calling for the government to do more. As such, the government has decided to push GST up to 7 per cent to offset it's proposed social policies. Many lement that this measure would in effect render the middle and lower incomed segments of our population worst off. In opposition, many are calling for a whole array of alternative measures, some suggest that we should use our reserves to plug the gap; others reason that we should tax the rich and embrace western socialism; others say that we have to cut down our spending on other sectors. These are reasonable solutions, but are they viable in our nation-state? Plugging the gap with our reserves which is effectively property of the citizenry. Certainly it sounds convenient, but in the long run, how long can the reserve be used to plug the gap? Income gaps are here to stay, it's just a causal effect of our globalized world. Even the United States is facing a debate of such on it's own. Of course, most western nations have socialism to turn to, but can socialism work in Singapore? Given the investor reliant economy we are?
I believe the plug gap measure of re-distributing our annual surpluses is a start, even though meagre the sum, it shows the administrations' readiness to utilize that option when need be.
I tell you, they are encouraging more migrants to come so that they will vote for them...because they're losing a lot of local supporters.Originally posted by bila_prem:PAP is lucky because singaporeans vote for them.
Exactly. The PRs among my close circle of friends confided that they did not accept Singapore's invitation to become citizens because "Singapore citizenship is not worth very much".Originally posted by ShutterBug:I tell you, they are encouraging more migrants to come so that they will vote for them...because they're losing a lot of local supporters.
But foreigners aren't that dumb... they can see for themselves what being a local is like...
Is this a code? I will not spend anytime trying to decode lah. Please speak in simple english lah... if you dunno english can use singlish also lah. I will try to understand what you are trying to say...Originally posted by lionnoisy:2.many xyz&%%4 PAP,LKY LHL in coffe shops and still appear
tmr?why?