
In this country? Of course not. The Govt merely labels us as cowards.Originally posted by claudetnt:i respect your decision but from personal experience dealing with the establishment currrently and in the past our views - individually we are not really no taken seriously no matter how much sense one makes!
In this country? Of course not. The Govt merely labels us as cowards.Originally posted by claudetnt:i respect your decision but from personal experience dealing with the establishment currrently and in the past our views - individually we are not really no taken seriously no matter how much sense one makes!
Originally posted by robertteh:The following is the response of Straits Times editor to a letter which was written giving comments on Minister's Ng Eng Hen's interview on GST/Reserve on TV.
It can be seen that Straits Times is too afraid to publish serious letters in the forum page questioning government ministers on major policies.
It is this sort of fear which has caused many NKF and Shin Corp problems which today are still begging for solutions.
It is quite doubtful that the non-publication of such letters are caused by too many letters being received or lack of space as one could easily see that only letters praising the government or those concerning minor petty issues are published.
However for public relation to show a good image of themselves, Straits Times' replies of rejection will thank the writers for writing and ask the they continue to write those letters without any meaning as to intention or honoring of promise.
QUOTE: "Thank you for writing to us. We do appreciate your making the effort.
We receive up to 70 letters each day. Limited space means we can publish only about a dozen every weekday.
This means having to make often-difficult editorial judgments on which letters to publish.
We regret we are unable to publish your letter this time.
Yours sincerely
Ms Noor Aiza
for Forum Editor
The Straits Times"UNQUOTE"
Just as you have said, our scholars in Straits Times and Today have replied to writers whose letters were rejected from publication on the ground of limitation of space or some other craps. They would rather print letters concerning stray or noisy dogs and cats. This is the extent of meritocracy where scholars were engaged to do the bidding of autocratic leaders to serve their own interest.Originally posted by bigmouthjoe:![]()
![]()
So they rather print letters about noisy dogs and cats... dumb siah. She ought to be shot for being such a bad liar!!!!![]()
Ya. Those who ask critical questions may not be a good problem solver. Politicans are there to solve problems, while ordinary citizens are there to ask critical questions. But when politicans patted themselves on the back and refuse to listen to ordinary citizens, problems will start to kick in.Originally posted by robertteh:Thanks for suggestion but I do not think I make a good politician so I intend only to offer my views as I am entitled to point out where things have gone wrong.
I would rather than citizens collectively exercise their role to check on shortcomings by offering views in all venues and forums.
Yeah now they think they are so damn good. They have reach the point of ignorance!!! See how our Foreign minister replies to everyone, like he is damn big shot..Originally posted by Hogzilla:Ya. Those who ask critical questions may not be a good problem solver. Politicans are there to solve problems, while ordinary citizens are there to ask critical questions. But when politicans patted themselves on the back and refuse to listen to ordinary citizens, problems will start to kick in.