Ooops! No More Sand For Singapore.
-
But how much our stupid SG paid 4 it!!!!Originally posted by lionnoisy:
taken from www.zaobao.com hard copy.Hill of sands reserve.
note the fence to gauage the height of reserves. -
HOw come our neighbours machaim like all pissed off with us at around the same time? Malaysia blame us for flood, Indonesia don't want 2 sell sand, Thailand kpkb about Thaksin visiting us. Are we really that bad at diplomacy or we just attracting the green-eye monsters around us?
-
2.i duny know.But i think all are bought slowly and quitely thro the years.Originally posted by foomwee88:But how much our stupid SG paid 4 it!!!!
May be all are bought in Asian econ crisis and so cheap.
3.u know we sporean afraid to die and follow this instruction
letter to letter:
READINESS IS OUR ONLY PROTECTION. click me
4.SG Bad in diplomacy?Have we help them when they in time of
need?Have we trained them for free or low price,like recent training'Thai
emergency doctors.
Without strong SAF,there will be no diplomacy.
Like the Chinese saying go:Stop war by power.
May be u think we always say YES then is good diplomacy. -
Originally posted by lionnoisy:
Sg govt won't help them for nothing!!!!!! You co ck!!!
2.i duny know.But i think all are bought slowly and quitely thro the years.
May be all are bought in Asian econ crisis and so cheap.
3.u know we sporean afraid to die and follow this instruction
letter to letter:
[b]READINESS IS OUR ONLY PROTECTION. click me
4.SG Bad in diplomacy?Have we help them when they in time of
need?Have we trained them for free or low price,like recent training'Thai
emergency doctors.
Without strong SAF,there will be no diplomacy.
Like the Chinese saying go:Stop war by power.
May be u think we always say YES then is good diplomacy. [/b]
You jolly well know that pap used to say....NO FREE LUNCHES!!!! co ck you!!! -
something bad will happen by the end of the month to us regarding this.
-
Actually it's possible....just need sponsorship to make it a reality....not very ex only USD10 billion a piece!!!Originally posted by foomwee88:U r 2 innovative oreli, I only heard of a Giant cruise only can take in less than 10,000 ppls.
We hve 4 millions ppls in Spore!!
ai! may be let those dogs leave first and become wild stray dogs, which then be killed in overseas and hence our problems could be solved cauz they r the ones who created problems with the neighbouring countries!!!
Anyway,it is a good imagination although not practical and reality!!!!
check this out http://www.freedomship.com/
Each of this ship can easily take in 1 satellite town
Think of it, instead of building purpose bulit aircraft carrier, how about building and unsinkable floating city with an airport on top. -
Originally posted by lionnoisy:
That is so skewed. As far as Singapore is concerned, self-interest is above everything else. Helping them in time of emergency is for maximum propaganda effect. Oh, how generous we Singaporeans are!
2.i duny know.But i think all are bought slowly and quitely thro the years.
May be all are bought in Asian econ crisis and so cheap.
3.u know we sporean afraid to die and follow this instruction
letter to letter:
[b]READINESS IS OUR ONLY PROTECTION. click me
4.SG Bad in diplomacy?Have we help them when they in time of
need?Have we trained them for free or low price,like recent training'Thai
emergency doctors.
Without strong SAF,there will be no diplomacy.
Like the Chinese saying go:Stop war by power.
May be u think we always say YES then is good diplomacy. [/b] -
U ask LKY 2 do it !!!Originally posted by bigballs11:Actually it's possible....just need sponsorship to make it a reality....not very ex only USD10 billion a piece!!!
check this out http://www.freedomship.com/
Each of this ship can easily take in 1 satellite town
Think of it, instead of building purpose bulit aircraft carrier, how about building and unsinkable floating city with an airport on top.
Who let the dog out!!!!!not me!!! -
Many will be unemployed.
Sand mining is not the worst to spoil the environment.
Losing income to protect environment.
Sand exporters in Batam say ban will hurt 3,000 workers.
National News - January 27, 2007,Fadli, The Jakarta Post, Batam.... Syahrul said the new policy would reduce the production capacity of the Riau Islands' 32 sand mining companies. It could also hurt up to 3,000 workers, whose incomes depend on sand mining.
---http://www.thejakartapost.com/yesterdaydetail.asp?fileid=20070127.G02
He said sand mining causes less environmental harm than other mining activities. It requires the use of about 50 hectares over three years, while other mining activities, such as coal and granite mining, usually require some 5,000 ha for use over 15 years.
"In terms of the environment, there are other much more harmful activities. We've committed S$3 from each exported cubic meter of sand toward environmental conservation," Syahrul said..... -
Originally posted by lionnoisy:
You may as well say if they don't burn the forest and let the haze blows into Singapore, millions will be out of job. Double standards.
Many will be unemployed.
Sand mining is not the worst to spoil the environment.
Losing income to protect environment.
[b]Sand exporters in Batam say ban will hurt 3,000 workers.
National News - January 27, 2007,Fadli, The Jakarta Post, Batam
---http://www.thejakartapost.com/yesterdaydetail.asp?fileid=20070127.G02[/b] -
your argument got no logic.Originally posted by chiabaliao:You may as well say if they don't burn the forest and let the haze blows into Singapore, millions will be out of job. Double standards.
If they don't burn the forest and employ people to cut the trees and clear the bushes, they will employ more people, no haze, environmental friendly. -
That picture is so 'socialist'.
To 'stop war with power'? Thank goodness PAP govt has not threatend to secure the sand by force, unlike their military threat to Malaysia for cutting water supply.
since when war comes into picture here.
Propaganda filth from has 'infiltrated'.
TAKE COVER. -
your argument got no logic. Mr. Green If they don't burn the forest and employ people to cut the trees and clear the bushes, they will employ more people, no haze, environmental friendly.
Kind of double standard again. They employ people to harvest the palms, not cut trees. -
your argument got no logic. Mr. Green If they don't burn the forest and employ people to cut the trees and clear the bushes, they will employ more people, no haze, environmental friendly.
Kind of double standard again. They employ people to harvest the palms, not cut trees. After ravaging the land for sands, then how? Employ people to fill back the land? How? With money and earth from Singapore?